USGS

Water Quality in Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota, 1992-95

Table of contents || Previous section || Next table || Next section || Glossary || PDF document


SUMMARY OF COMPOUND DETECTIONS AND CONCENTRATIONS


Table 6. Concentrations of herbicides, insecticides, volatile organic compounds, nutrients, and radon detected in surface or ground water of the Red River of the North Basin Study Unit
[mg/L, milligrams per liter; µg/L, micrograms per liter; pCi/L, picocuries per liter; %, percent; <, less than;--, not measured; trade names may vary; footnotes on p. 29]

EXPLANATION
Freshwater-chronic criterion for the protection of aquatic life¹
Drinking water standard or guideline¹
Range of surface-water detections in all 20 NAWQA Study Units
Range of ground-water detections in all 20 NAWQA Study Units
Detection in the Red River of the North Study Unit
Herbicide (Trade or common name) Rate of detection² Concentration, in µg/L
Acetochlor 12%
0%
Acifluorfen (Blazer) 9%
0%
Alachlor (Lasso) 11%
1%
2,6-Diethylaniline (metabolite) 0%
<1%
Atrazine (AAtrex) 79%
16%
Deethylatrazine³ (metabolite) 22%
15%
Bentazon (Basagran) 20%
3%
Bromoxynil (Buctril) 3%
0%
Cyanazine (Bladex) 56%
1%
2,4-D (Butyrac) 12%
0%
DCPA (Dacthal) <1%
0%
Dicamba (Banvel) 1%
1%
Dichlorprop (Kildip) <1%
0%
Diuron (Karmex, Direx) 1%
0%
EPTC (Eptam) 28%
1%
Ethalfluralin (Sonalan) 3%
0%
Fenuron (Beet-Kleen, fenidim) 1%
0%
MCPA 6%
0%
Metolachlor (Dual) 25%
1%
Metribuzin (Lexone, Sencor) 3%
3%
Molinate (Ordram) <1%
0%
Pendimethalin (Prowl) <1%
0%
Picloram (Tordon) 0%
3%
Prometon (Pramitol) 14%
0%
Propachlor (Ramrod) <1%
0%
Propanil (Stampede) <1%
0%
Simazine (Princep, Weedex) 10%
3%
Tebuthiuron (Spike) <1%
0%
Terbacil³ (Sinbar) <1%
0%
Triallate (Far-Go) 19%
0%
Trifluralin (Treflan) 7%
0%
Insecticide (Trade or common name) Rate of detection² Concentration, in µg/L
Aldicarb³ (Temik) <1%
0%
Azinphos-methyl³ (Guthion) <1%
0%
Carbaryl³ (Sevin, Savit) <1%
0%
Carbofuran³ (Furadan) 14%
0%
Chlorpyrifos (Lorsban) 2%
0%
p,p'-DDE (metabolite) <1%
<1%
Diazinon <1%
0%
Fonofos (Dyfonate) 1%
0%
gamma-HCH 2%
0%
Malathion (malathon, Cythion) 1%
<1%
Methyl parathion (Penncap-M) <1%
0%
Propoxur (Blattanex, Undene) 1%
0%
Volatile organic compound (Trade or common name) Rate of detection² Concentration, in µg/L
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene --
3%
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene --
3%
Chloroethene (vinyl chloride) --
3%
Dimethylbenzenes (total xylenes) --
3%
Ethenylbenzene (styrene) --
3%
Ethylbenzene (phenylethane) --
3%
Isopropylbenzene (cumene) --
3%
Methylbenzene (toluene) --
3%
Naphthalene --
3%
n-Butylbenzene (1-phenylbutane) --
3%
n-Propylbenzene (isocumene) --
3%
Nutrient Rate of detection² Concentration, in mg/L
Dissolved ammonia as nitrogen 92%
80%
Dissolved ammonia plus organic nitrogen as nitrogen 100%
46%
Dissolved phosphorus as phosphorus 90%
57%
Dissolved nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen 76%
54%
Other Rate of detection² Concentration, in pCi/L
Radon 222 --
99%


¹ Selected water-quality standards and guidelines or sediment-quality guidelines(Gilliom and others, in press).

² Rates of detection are based on the number of analyses and detections in the Study Unit, not on national data. Rates of detection for herbicides and insecticides were computed by only counting detections equal to or greater than 0.01 µg/L in order to facilitate equal comparisons among compounds, which had widely varying detection limits. For herbicides and insecticides, a detection rate of ''<1%'' means that all detections are less than 0.01 µg/L, or the detection rate rounds to less than one percent. For other compound groups, all detections were counted and minimum detection limits for most compounds were similar to the lower end of the national ranges shown. Method detection limits for all compounds in these tables are summarized in Gilliom and others (in press).

³ Detections of these compounds are reliable, but concentrations are determined with greater uncertainty than for the other compounds and are reported as estimated values (Zaugg and others, 1995).


U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1169

Table of contents || Previous section || Next table || Next section || Glossary || PDF document

Suggested citation:
Stoner, J.D., Lorenz, D.L., Goldstein, R.M., Brigham, M.E., and Cowdery, T.K., 1998, Water Quality in the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota, 1992-95: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1169, on line at <URL: https://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ1169>, updated April 21, 1998

This page is a subpage of <URL:http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ1169>
Email questions and comments to GS-W_NAWQA_redn@usgs.gov
Last modified: 4/9/98