2-4. Hilina slump area, 2001 @[P Lipman, T. Sisson, and J. Kimura]
A key part of the first JAMSTEC Hawaii project
has been the submersible investigation of
deep-water portions of the Hilina slump area.
The Hilina slump, south flank of Hawaii Island,
is currently the most actively deforming
flank of any oceanic island worldwide. This
is an actively deforming area at least 40
km wide on the southeast flank of the currently
active Kilauea volcano that is presently
moving seaward at rates up to 10 cm/yr, which
has been mapped by recent detailed multi-beam
bathymetric surveys. The Hilina region consists
of an assemblage of on-land slump blocks
bounded by the Hilina fault system, a steep
upper submarine slope down to about 300 m
water depth that represents the primary constructional
slope of the Kilauea shield, a mid-slope
bench including a closed basin that has formed
by compressional uplift along the toe of
the slump, and a steep lower scarp that has
generated large outlying slide block (Figure
2-4-1).
(Fig. 2-4-1)
In 1868 and 1975 this region moved abruptly
several to tens of meters during major earthquakes
(M7.9 and M7.2, respectively) with attendant
destructive tsunamis. The tsunami generated
in both 1868 and 1975 resulted in extensive
damage and fatalities on Hawaii, and the
1975 tsunami produced minor damage in California.
The possibility exists that future detachments
of this type, or far more extensive and catastrophic
debris avalanches, will occur in the future.
The entire south flank of the island shows
evidence for slumping and collapse. This
proto-slump has now broken into two slumps
that are buttressed in the middle by Loihi
Seamount. These slumps are the Punaluu slump
west of Loihi and the Hilina slump east of
Loihi. The presence of debris-avalanche deposits
along adjacent island flanks indicates the
potential for catastrophic failure of such
unstable slopes. The continuous creep and
incremental movement associated with the
large earthquakes are apparently driven by
both magmatic processes within the active
volcanoes and gravity. However, the mechanisms
by which these slowly creeping slumps fail
catastrophically are unknown, as are the
precursors to such activity.
Previous results: Submersible observations and samples from
the 1998-1999 cruises show that the lower
south flank of Hawaii, offshore from Kilauea
volcano and the active Hilina slump system,
consists entirely of compositionally diverse
volcaniclastic rocks; pillow lavas are confined
to shallow slopes. Submarine-erupted basalt
clasts have strongly variable alkalic and
transitional basalt compositions (to 41%
SiO2, 10.8% alkalis), contrasting with present-day
Kilauea tholeiites. The volcaniclastic rocks
provide a unique record of ancestral alkalic
growth of an archetypal hotspot volcano,
including transition to its tholeiitic shield
stage, and associated slope-failure events.
The geometry and diverse constituents of
the slump terrain require initial slumping
during submarine alkalic volcanism. A conspicuous
NW-trending scarp, aligned with Papafu Seamount,
bounds the slump terrain on its SW side but
has no subaerial expression. In contrast,
a parallel scarp, which bounds the Punalufu
slump from Mauna Loa, merges on land with
a conspicuous fault zone that moved 2-3 m
laterally during the 1868 earthquake. This
contrasting subaerial expression, along with
the dominance of alkalic clasts in the lower
scarp, suggests that the distal slump and
its western bounding scarp initially developed
prior to shield growth at Kilauea and inception
of the active Hilina faults; size and volume
of the tholeiitic shield are smaller than
previously inferred. Such early structures
may have localized younger Hilina slumping.
Many questions remain, but perhaps the active
Hilina slump structures on Kilaueafs south
flank are in an early growth stage, thus
posing greater future potential for larger-scale
landsliding and devastating tsunamis.
The results of the 1998-99 dives onto the
deformed flanks and adjacent seafloor of
Hawaii provided critical motivation to return
to this area with the ROV KAIKO in 2001.
Many of the original questions relating to
the mechanics and history of deformation
along the flanks are still unanswered, and
in addition, new ones have been raised. For
example, what is the volcanic flank really
composed of? The presence of indurated volcanic
sandstones throughout the deep portions of
the south flank of Kilauea suggest that the
distal slopes of Hawaiian volcanoes are largely
composed of sediment. This possibility has
implications for the mechanical strength
and long-term stability of the deforming
flanks. However, the occurrence of primary
volcanic rocks upslope of the sedimentary
strata on Kilauea suggests that the transition
from volcanic to clastic environment may
be relatively complicated. In order to interpret
the evolution of the islands, and the kinematics
of the deforming flanks, it is important
to know the location and nature of this transition.
Year 2001 dive targets: Three additional dives were carried out
in the Hilina area, in order to test the
interpretations of early hotspot magmatic
evolution and concurrent slope failures developed
so far (Figure 2-4-1). The priority targets
were two sites along the lower flank of Papafu
Seamount and the aligned transverse structural
trend (including completing a dive lost to
bad sea conditions in 1999), and a dive to
test boundaries of the compositional transition
from submarine-erupted alkalic to tholeiitic
basalt (Fig. 2-4-1). The three 2001 dives
together make a linked package that explore
the previously unknown western boundary of
the Hilina bench.
Dive #1 (K207) along the transverse structure
was considered (unsuccessfully) the best
potential opportunity to sample primary alkalic
lavas of ancestral Kilauea, as the deep-water
steep slope most proximal to the Kilauea
eruptive center. Volcaniclastic materials
collected along this slope should provide
additional controls on the early growth history
and petrologic evolution of Kilauea This
dive site also provides an opportunity to
evaluate deformation features related to
the transverse boundary.
Dive #2 (K208) along a prominent rib above
the western margin of the mid-slope bench
was intended to constrain the three-dimensional
distribution and compositions of pillow lavas,
found at these depths farther to the east
(dives K95, S504), versus the volcaniclastic
rocks that dominate below the bench. Pillow
lavas sampled during this dive should provide
an important control on the compositional
transition from alkalic to tholeiitic lavas
during early growth of Kilauea.
Dive #3 (K209) along the southwest flank
of Papafu Seamount was intended to test
alternative interpretations of this enigmatic
feature. Based largely on bottom photographs,
this rounded submarine topographic high has
previously been interpreted as a massive
sand-rubble landslide deposit derived from
an embayment near the Kilauea shoreline at
the west margin of the active on-land Hilina
fault system (Fornari and Moore, 1978). Alternatively,
recent seismic-reflection profiling suggests
that the seamount is a broad anticlinal structure,
containing reflective bedded sediments of
the mid-slope bench that have been compressionally
upwarped along the transverse boundary of
the Hilina bench during seaward thrusting
(J. Morgan and G. Moore, written commun.,
2000).
Geochemical objectives
The 1998 and 1999 JAMSTEC cruises to Hawaii
revealed a nearly complete record of the
geochemical and petrologic evolution of Kilauea
volcano in rocks of the submarine Hilina
region. This is the first case for any Hawaiian
volcano where development can be traced from
inception-stage strongly alkalic magmas,
through transitional basalts, to fully mature
shield-stage tholeiites. Interpretations
based on existing samples are that both increasing
degrees of partial melting and zonation in
the composition of the Hawaiian plume contribute
to the progression from alkalic to tholeiitic
magma types. Results also point to stagnation
of early alkalic magmas in the lithosphere
where many underwent fractional crystallization,
in contrast to the mature shield stage where
primitive magmas are delivered to the bases
of the volcano edifices.
Much of the evidence for the early alkalic
phase of Kilauea consists of high-S alkalic
glass grains in volcanic glass sandstones.
These include nephelinites, basanites, phonotephrites,
hawaiites, and alkalic basalts. Their high
sulfur contents establish that they were
erupted at great water depths and were not
subaerial magmas erupted during the waning
stages of mature Hawaiian volcanoes. They
must represent products of the inception
of volcano growth. The glass-bearing sandstones,
as well as interstratified debris flow breccias
containing alkalic clasts, are exposed along
the frontal scarp of the 3000 m depth Hilina
bench. Previous JAMSTEC dives have recovered
only three nephelinite clasts suitable for
conventional geochemical studies. The suite
of basanite clasts is only slightly larger
with four samples. A primary objective was
therefore to expand the number of clast samples
derived from ancestral Kilauea to better
understand its geochemical diversity and
the processes that led to its inception.
Samples of primary alkalic eruptive deposits,
such as pillow lavas, dikes, or sheet flows
would further strengthen the case that the
alkalic Hilina compositions are indeed products
of Kilauea. Alkalic clasts or lavas are also
suitable for 40Ar/39Ar dating that would
augment the existing suite of six dated ancestral
Kilauea samples.
Pillow lavas of the post-alkalic transitional-basalt
phase have previously been sampled in only
one area at the northeastern end of the Hilina
bench. It is presently unknown if the suite
of samples from that area is representative.
Another stratigraphically controlled suite
of pillow lavas with transitional compositions
would improve understanding of this intermediate
magmatic stage, and potentially could record
either the cessation of alkalic magmatism
or the onset of mature tholeiitic magmatism.
More comprehensive pillow lava samples could
also help to reveal the size and depth of
the ancestral Kilauea edifice through analyses
of volatiles quenched in pillow rind glasses,
combined with known pressure - volatile solubility
relations. Together, these studies will provide
a much clearer and definitive picture of
the development of Kilauea and other oceanic-island
volcanoes worldwide.
Work plan: These continuing marine studies on the
south flank slump terrain will closely interface
with the abundant existing data and several
in-progress studies on Hawaiian volcanoes
and with ongoing slope-stability studies
in Hawaii and elsewhere. The Hawaiian Volcano
Observatory of the USGS monitors earthquake
activity in Hawaii, including the active
Hilina slump area. Scripps Institute of Oceanography
recently has installed a transect of GPS-measurable
survey points across the Hilina bench; these
will document the current motion of the underwater
region adjacent to the actively deforming
coastline. A joint Japanese-US research program
is underway to study the seismicity of Kilauea
Volcano. The University of Hawaii is completing
interpretation of a seismic reflection survey
of the Hilina bench that should allow first-order
predictions about the types of materials
that may outcrop at the seafloor along the
flanks and in the slide blocks; these data
were used to guide siting of the 2001 dives,
particularly across the southwest flank of
Papafu Seamount and the incised flank above
the bench. Results of the new KAIKO dives
will provide important constraints on the
seismic interpretations and models. In addition
the dive results provide an incomplete three-dimensional
sampling of the submarine flank of Hawaii
Island, apparently containing interfingering
volcaniclastic debris derived from several
volcanoes, that should make for instructive
comparisons and contrasts with the complete
one-dimensional section being provided by
the in-progress Hawaii Scientific Drilling
Project at Hilo.
Successful interpretation of the stratigraphic,
structural, and petrologic complexities of
the Hilina slump area, for which questions
still outnumber answers, has critical implications
for understanding the primary depositional
growth of the submarine flanks of oceanic
volcanic islands, and also for structural
evolution of the Hilina slump system and
development of large slumps elsewhere in
the Hawaiian chain and on other oceanic islands.
Thorough study of the active Hilina slump
area should permit fascinating comparisons
with the new dive data on geometrically similar
slump and compressional structures at Waianae,
South Kona, and Laupahoehoe.
We will use submersible visual/video data
and marine seismic reflection data to interpret
the structure of the west margin of the Hilina
bench, and their relation to volcano spreading
along a basal the detachment. Samples will
be analyzed chemically and petrographically
in order to determine compositions and eruption
depths of pillow lavas and the fragments
in volcaniclastic rocks. Analytical methods
will include major and trace elements for
bulk-rock samples by XRF, INAA, and solution-based
ICP-MS methods, glass compositions by electron-probe
(EPMA), laser-ablation ICP-MS, and ion-probe
analyses, and volatile contents by EPMA and
FTIR measurements. Radiogenic and stable
isotopic compositions of pillow- glass, glass-sand,
and whole-rock samples will be compared to
analogous data from other Hawaiian volcanoes,
especially with the detailed data emerging
from the Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project.
We will use a combination of dating techniques,
including K-Ar, and 40Ar/39Ar methods, to
determine the eruption ages of any high-K
basalt samples. Two new piston cores south
of Hawaii Island (P12, P13) will also test
the important stratigraphic, paleomagnetic,
and geochronologic correlations among basalt-glass
turbidites and fill gaps between cores P5
and P6 collected in 1998.