The High
Plains aquifer underlies one of the major agricultural regions in
the world, including parts of eight states—Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. In parts
of the area that overlie the High Plains aquifer, farmers began
extensive use of ground water for irrigation starting in the 1930’s
and 1940’s. Estimated irrigated acreage in the area that overlies
the High Plains aquifer increased rapidly from 1940 to 1980, but
did not change greatly from 1980 to 2002:
|
Figure 1.
Ground-water withdrawals for irrigation by county during 2000
(U.S. Geological Survey, 2004). |
1949–2.1 million acres, 1980–13.7 million acres, 1997–13.9 million
acres, 2002–12.7 million acres. However, the proportion of irrigated
acreage in each state relative to total irrigated acres did change
substantially over time in some states: 1980–21 percent of irrigated
acres were in Kansas, and 38 percent of irrigated acres were in
Nebraska; 2002–15 percent of irrigated acres were in Kansas, and
45 percent of irrigated acres were in Nebraska (Heimes and Luckey,
1982; Thelin and Heimes, 1987; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1999,
2004). Annual ground-water withdrawals from the High Plains aquifer
for irrigation, which is compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey
and agencies in each State about every 5 years, increased from 4
to 19 million acre-feet from 1949 to 1974; ground-water withdrawals
for irrigation decreased from 1974 to 1995 and increased from 1995
to 2000 (Heimes and Luckey, 1982; U.S. Geological Survey, 2004;
U.S. Geological Survey’s National Water-Data Storage and Retrieval
System database). Ground-water withdrawals for irrigation in 1980,
1985, 1990, and 1995 were from 4 to 18 percent less than withdrawals
for irrigation in 1974. Ground-water withdrawals for irrigation
in 2000 were 12 percent greater than withdrawals in 1995 and 2 percent
greater than withdrawals in 1974. Ground-water withdrawals for irrigation
during 2000 by county in the area that overlies the High Plains
aquifer ranged from zero to 0.5 million acre-feet (fig. 1);
more than 96 percent of the total withdrawals from the aquifer were
for irrigation (U.S. Geological Survey, 2004; Joan Kenny, U.S. Geological
Survey, written commun., March 2004).
Water-level declines started to occur in the High Plains aquifer
soon after the beginning of extensive ground-water irrigation. The
water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer result from an imbalance
between discharge and recharge. Discharge is primarily from ground-water
withdrawals for irrigation, but also includes evapotranspiration,
where the water table is near land surface, and seepage to streams
and springs where the water table intersects the land surface. Recharge
is primarily from precipitation; other sources of recharge are irrigation
return flow and seepage from streams, canals, and reservoirs. By
1980, water levels in the High Plains aquifer in parts of Texas,
Oklahoma, and southwestern Kansas had declined more than 100 feet
(Luckey and others, 1981). Water-level declines may result in increased
costs for ground-water withdrawals because of increased pumping
lift and decreased well yields. Water-level declines also can affect
ground-water availability, surface-water flow, and near-stream habitat
(riparian) areas.
In response to the water-level declines in the High Plains aquifer,
the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with numerous Federal,
State, and local water-resource agencies, began monitoring more
than 7,000 wells in 1988 to assess the annual water-level change
in the aquifer; there were 9,202 wells
Table 1. Number
of wells used in this report for 2003 water levels and number
of wells used for the water-level comparison periods, predevelopment
to 2003 and 2002 to 2003. |
|
measured for 2003 (table 1). The purpose of this report is to present
water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer from the time prior
to substantial ground-water irrigation development (about 1950,
which is termed “predevelopment” in this report) to 2003 and from
2002 to 2003. The water-level measurements used in this report generally
were collected in winter or early spring, when irrigation wells
typically were not pumping and water levels generally had recovered
from the stress of pumping during the previous irrigation season;
an exception was that in 2003, most wells in South Dakota were measured
in late spring or early summer.
The water-level-change maps and related area-weighted average water-level
change values in this report were prepared using two methods. The
map of water-level changes, predevelopment to 2003 (fig. 2), shows
areas of water-level change ranges, which were determined manually
based on predevelopment and 2003 water-level data from available
wells and areas of water-level changes from previous reports (Lowry
and others, 1967; Luckey and others, 1981; Nebraska Conservation
and Survey Division, 2004). The map of generalized water-level changes,
2002 to 2003 (fig. 3), shows computer-generated Thiessen polygons
(Thiessen, 1911), colored by the water-level-change range. Thiessen
polygons apportion the water-level change in each well to an area
around the well; the size of each polygon depends on the proximity
of neighboring wells.
The predevelopment to 2003 area-weighted average water-level change
(table 2) was computed by summing the quantity equal to the area within each polygon of water-level
change multiplied by the value of the mid-point of the
Table 2. Area-weighted
average water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer, not
including the areas of little or no saturated thickness, predevelopment
to 2003 and 2002 to 2003. |
|
polygon range and by dividing the result by the total area. The 2002
to 2003 area-weighted average water-level change was computed by summing
the quantity equal to the area of each Thiessen polygon multiplied
by the actual water-level change value associated with the Thiessen
polygon and by dividing the result by the total area.
WATER-LEVEL CHANGES, PREDEVELOPMENT TO 2003
The map of water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer from
predevelopment to 2003 (fig. 2) is based on water levels from 3,792
wells (table 1). The water-level changes from predevelopment to
2003 ranged between a rise of 86 feet and a decline of 223 feet.
The area-weighted average water-level change across the High Plains,
not including the areas with little or no saturated thickness, was
a decline of 12.6 feet (table 2). Approximately 24 percent of the
aquifer area, not including the areas with little or no saturated
thickness, had more than 10 feet of water-level decline from predevelopment
to 2003; 17 percent had more than 25 feet of water-
|
Figure 2.
Water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer, predevelopment
to 2003 (Modified from Lowry and others, 1967; Luckey and others,
1981; Nebraska Conservation and Survey Division, 2004). |
level decline, and 9 percent had more that 50 feet of water-level
decline. The largest areas with greater than 50 feet of water-level
decline occurred in southwest Kansas, east-central New Mexico, the
central part of the Oklahoma Panhandle, and the western part of
the Texas Panhandle.
WATER-LEVEL CHANGES, 2002 TO 2003
Water-level changes in the 8,208 wells used for the 2002 to 2003 comparison
period (table 1) ranged between a rise of 9 feet and a decline of
14 feet; water-level declines of 3 feet or greater occurred in 19
percent of the wells measured (fig. 3). The area-weighted average
water-level change in the High Plains aquifer from 2002 to 2003,
not including the areas of little or no saturated thickness, ranged
by State from a decline of 1.7 feet in Kansas to a decline of 0.3
foot in Wyoming (table 2). The area-weighted average water-level
change in the High Plains aquifer from 2002 to 2003 for the aquifer
area, not including the areas of little or no saturated thickness,
was a decline of 1.2 feet (table 2).
CHANGE IN WATER IN STORAGE, PRE-DEVELOPMENT TO 2003
Because the High Plains aquifer is generally unconfined, the change
in water in storage in the High Plains aquifer can be estimated
using the water-level change maps (figs. 2 and 3) and the average
specific yield of the aquifer (Gutentag and others, 1984). Specific
yield is an estimate of the volume of water that a volume of the
aquifer will yield by gravity drainage (Lohman, 1979). This method
for calculating the change in water in storage will overestimate
the change in storage in local areas if the aquifer was under confined
conditions at the start of the time period and unconfined conditions
later.
|
Figure 3. Generalized water-level
changes in the High Plains aquifer, 2002 to 2003. |
Total water in storage in 2003 was about 2,940 million acre-feet,
which was a decline of about 235 million acre-feet since predevelopment
(fig. 4); total water in storage in 2003 was estimated from total
water in storage in 2000, which was based on the saturated thickness
of the aquifer in 2000 (McGuire and others, 2003), and the sum of
annual changes in water in storage from 2000 to 2003, which was
based on average area-weighted water-level changes calculated from
Theissen polygons (McGuire, 2003, 2004; table 3). Total water in
storage in predevelopment was inferred from total water in storage
in 2000 and water-level changes, predevelopment to 2000 (McGuire
and others, 2003). There were changes in storage prior to “predevelopment,”
as defined in this report, but this change in storage was not calculatedhere.
Water in storage declined about 150 million acre-feet from predevelopment
to 1980 based on predevelopment and 1980 water levels (Luckey and
others, 1981; McGuire, 2004); the annual change in storage from
predevelopment to 1980 and from 1981 to 1987 were not calculated
for this report. For this report, total ground water in storage
from 1988 to 2000 (fig. 4) was calculated by subtracting annual
changes in water in storage, 1988 to 2000, from total water in storage
in 2000 (Dugan and Cox, 1994; Dugan and others, 1990, 1994; Dugan
and Schild, 1992; Dugan and Sharpe, 1996; Kastner and others, 1989;
McGrath and Dugan, 1993; McGuire, 2001, 2003; McGuire and Fischer,
1999, 2000; McGuire and others, 1999, 2003; McGuire and Sharpe,
1997). The sum of annual changes in water in
storage from 1988 to 2000 was a decline of about 47 million acre-feet,
based on average area-weighted water-level changes calculated from
Thiessen polygons.
|
Table
3. Change in water in storage in the High Plains aquifer,
predevelopment to 2003 and 2002 to 2003. |
Cattle grazing in Cimarron County, Oklahoma
(Photograph courtesy of R.R. Luckey, U.S. Geological Survey).
|
Figure 4.
Cumulative change and total ground-water in storage in the High
Plains aquifer for selected years, predevelopment through 2003
(Modified from McGuire and others, 2003; McGuire, 2004).
|
REFERENCES
Dugan, J.T., and Cox, D.A., 1994, Water-level changes in the High
Plains aquifer—Predevelopment to 1993: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources
Investigations Report 94–4157, 60 p.
Dugan, J.T., McGrath, T.S., and Zelt, R.B., 1994, Water-level changes
in the High Plains aquifer—Predevelopment to 1992: U.S. Geological
Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94–4027, 56 p.
Dugan, J.T., and Schild, D.E., 1992, Water-level changes in the
High Plains aquifer—Predevelopment to 1990: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations Report 91–4165, 55 p.
Dugan, J.T., Schild, D.E., and Kastner, W.M., 1990, Water-level
changes in the High Plains aquifer underlying parts of South Dakota,
Wyoming, Nebraska, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas—Predevelopment
through nonirrigation season 1988-89: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources
Investigations Report 90–4153, 29 p.
Dugan, J.T., and Sharpe, J.B., 1996, Water-level changes in the
High Plains aquifer—Predevelopment to 1994: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations Report 95–4208, 1 sheet.
Gutentag, E.D., Heimes, F.J., Krothe, N.C., Luckey, R.R., and Weeks,
J.B., 1984, Geohydrology of the High Plains aquifer in parts of
Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota,
Texas, and Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1400–B,
63 p.
Heimes, F.J., and Luckey, R.R., 1982, Method for estimating irrigation
requirements from ground water in the High Plains in parts of Colorado,
Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and
Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report
82–40, 64 p.
Kastner, W.M., Schild, D.E., and Spahr, D.S., 1989, Water-level
changes in the High Plains Aquifer underlying parts of South Dakota,
Wyoming, Nebraska, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas—predevelopment
through nonirrigation season 1987-88: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources
Investigations Report 89–4073, 61 p.
Lohman, S.W., 1979, Ground-water hydraulics: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 708, 70 p.
Lowry, M.E., Crist, M.A., and Tilstra, J.R.,1967, Geology and ground-water
resources of Laramie County, Wyoming; with a section on chemical
quality of ground water and of surface water: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Supply Paper 1834, 71 p.
Luckey, R.R., Gutentag, E.D., and Weeks, J.B., 1981, Water-level
and saturated-thickness changes, predevelopment to 1980, in the
High Plains aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming: U.S. Geological
Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA–652, 2 sheets, scale 1:2,500,000.
McGrath, T., and Dugan, J.T., 1993, Water-level changes in the
High Plains Aquifer—predevelopment to 1991: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Resources Investigations Report 93–4088, 53 p.
McGuire, V.L., 2001, Water-level changes in the High Plains Aquifer,
1980–1999: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-0029–01, 2 p.
McGuire, V.L., 2003, Water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer,
predevelopment to 2001, 1999 to 2000, and 2000 to 2001: U.S. Geological
Survey Fact Sheet FS-078-03, 4 p.
McGuire, V.L., 2004, Water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer,
predevelopment to 2002, 1980 to 2002, and 2001 to 2002: U.S. Geological
Survey Fact Sheet FS-2004–3026, 6 p.
McGuire, V.L., and Fischer, B.C., 2000, Water-level changes in
the High Plains, 1980 to 1998: U.S. Geological Survey, accessed
August 26, 2004 at URL http://www-ne.cr.usgs.gov/highplains/hp98_web_report/hp98fs.htm.
McGuire, V.L., and Fischer, B.C., 1999, Water-level changes, 1980
to 1997, and saturated thickness 1996–97, in the High Plains Aquifer:
U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-124–99, 4 p.
McGuire, V.L., Johnson, M.R., Schieffer, R.L., Stanton, J.S., Sebree,
S.K., and Verstraeten, I.M., 2003, Water in storage and approaches
to ground-water management, High Plains aquifer, 2000: U.S. Geological
Survey Circular 1243, 51 p.
McGuire, V.L., and Sharpe, J.B., 1997, Water-level changes in the
High Plains Aquifer, 1980 to 1995: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet
FS-0068–97, 4 p.
McGuire, V.L., Stanton, C.P. and Fischer, B.C., 1999, Water-level
changes in the High Plains aquifer—1980 to 1996: U.S. Geological
Survey, accessed August 26, 2004, at URL http://ne.water.usgs.gov/html/highplains/hp96_web_report/hp96_factsheet.htm.
Nebraska Conservation and Survey Division, 2004, Groundwater-level
changes in Nebraska from predevelopment to spring 2003: University
of Nebraska–Lincoln data, accessed July 11, 2004 at URL http://csd.unl.edu/csd-esic/gisdata/pred03z14.e00.
Thiessen, A.H., 1911, Precipitation averages for large areas: Monthly
Weather Review, v. 39, p. 1082–1084.
Thelin, G.P., and Heimes, F.J., 1987, Mapping irrigated cropland
from Landsat data for determination of water use from the High
Plains aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 1400–C, 38 p.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1999, 1997 Census of agriculture
geographic area series: National Agricultural Statistics Service
CD-ROM AC97-CD-VOL1-1B.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2004, Census of agriculture, volume
1, County level data: National Agriculture Statistics Service, accessed
July 13, 2004 at URL http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census02/volume1/index2.htm.
U.S. Geological Survey, 2004, Water Use in the United States: U.S.
Geological Survey data, accessed July 29, 2004 at URL http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/.
|