Skip Links

USGS - science for a changing world

Open-File Report 96-532

National Seismic Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996

By Arthur Frankel, Charles Mueller, Theodore Barnhard, David Perkins, E.V. Leyendecker, Nancy Dickman, Stanley Hanson, and Margaret Hopper

Brief Comparison with Previous USGS Maps

One of the major outcomes of the new maps for the CEUS is that the ground motions are about a factor of 2-3 times lower, on average, than the PGA values in Algermissen et al. (1990) and the spectral values in Algermissen et al. (1991) and Leyendecker et al. (1995). We discussed this difference at the workshops. The primary cause of this difference is the magnitudes assigned to pre-instrumental earthquakes in the catalog. Magnitudes of historic events used by Algermissen et al were based on Imax (maximum observed intensity), using magnitude-Imax relations derived from WUS earthquakes. This overestimates the magnitudes of these events and, in turn, overestimates the rates of M4.9 and larger events. The magnitudes of historic events used in the new maps were primarily derived by Seeber and Armbruster (1991) from either felt area or Imax using relations derived from CEUS earthquakes (Sibol et al., 1987). Thus, rates of M4.9 and larger events are much lower in the new catalog, compared to those used for the previous USGS maps.

 

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/1996/532/CEUSnotes2.html
Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 07-Dec-2016 16:06:16 EST