USGS - science for a changing world

Publications—Open-File Report 98–394

Data Quality Objectives and Criteria for Basic Information, Acceptable Uncertainty, and Quality-Assurance and Quality-Control Documentation

By GREGORY E. GRANATO, U.S. Geological Survey; FRED G. BANK, and PATRICIA A. CAZENAS, Federal Highway Administration

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98–394

Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration. A Contribution to the National Highway Runoff Data and Methodology Synthesis.

ONLINE ONLY


This report is available in Portable Document Format (PDF):

OFR 98–394 (176 KB)  – 25 pages


Abstract

The Federal Highway Administration and State transportation agencies have the responsibility of determining and minimizing the effects of highway runoff on water quality; therefore, they have been conducting an extensive program of water–quality monitoring and research during the last 25 years. The objectives and monitoring goals of highway runoff studies have been diverse, because the highway community must address many different questions about the characteristics and impacts of highway runoff. The Federal Highway Administration must establish that available data and procedures that are used to assess and predict pollutant loadings and impacts from highway stormwater runoff are valid, current, and technically supportable.

This report examines criteria for evaluating water–quality data and resultant interpretations. The criteria used to determine if data are valid (useful for intended purposes), current, and technically supportable are derived from published materials from the Federal Highway Administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Intergovernmental Task Force on Monitoring Water Quality, the U.S. Geological Survey and from technical experts throughout the U.S. Geological Survey.

Water–quality data that are documented to be meaningful, representative, complete, precise, accurate, comparable, and admissible as legal evidence will meet the scientific, engineering, and regulatory needs of highway agencies. Documentation of basic information, such as compatible monitoring objectives and program design features; metadata (when, where, and how data were collected as well as who collected and analyzed the data); ancillary information (explanatory variables and study-site characteristics); and legal requirements are needed to evaluate data. Documentation of sufficient quality–assurance and quality–control information to establish the quality and uncertainty in the data and interpretations also are needed to determine the comparability and utility of data sets for intended uses. The fact that a program's data may not meet screening criteria for a national synthesis does not mean that the data are not useful for meeting that program's objectives or that they could not be used for water–quality studies with different objectives.

Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Problem

Purpose and Scope

Data Quality Objectives

Basic Information Requirements

Monitoring Objectives and Program Design

Metadata Standards

Ancillary Information

Legal Requirements

Acceptable Uncertainty

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Summary

References


This report is available online in Portable Document Format (PDF). If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat PDF Reader, it is available for free download from Adobe Systems Incorporated.

Document Accessibility: Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visually impaired. This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools convert Adobe PDF documents into HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text as audible speech. In addition, an accessible version of Acrobat Reader 8.0 for Windows (English only), which contains support for screen readers, is available. These tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at Adobe Access.


Suggested Citation:
Granato, G.E., Bank, F.G., and Cazenas, P.A., 1998, Data Quality Objectives and Criteria for Basic Information, Acceptable Uncertainty, and Quality–Assurance and Quality–Control Documentation: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98–394.


For additional information write to:

Director,
USGS Massachusetts–Rhode Island Water Science Center
10 Bearfoot Road
Northborough, MA 01532

or visit our Web site at:
http://ma.water.usgs.gov



U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL: https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/ofr98394
Page Contact Information: USGS Publishing Network
Last modified: Wednesday, 07-Dec-2016 16:49:39 EST
FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button