USGS - science for a changing world

Publications—Open-File Report 01–259

Methodology and Significance of Studies of Atmospheric Deposition in Highway Runoff

By John A. Colman, Karen C. Rice, and Timothy C. Willoughby

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01–259

Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration. A Contribution to the National Highway Runoff Data and Methodology Synthesis.

ONLINE ONLY


This report is available in Portable Document Format (PDF):

OFR 01–259 (1,789 KB)  – 74 pages


Abstract

Atmospheric deposition and the processes that are involved in causing and altering atmospheric deposition in relation to highway surfaces and runoff were evaluated nationwide. Wet deposition is more easily monitored than dry deposition, and data on wet deposition are available for major elements and water properties (constituents affecting acid deposition) from the inter-agency National Atmospheric Deposition Program/ National Trends Network (NADP/NTN). Many trace constituents (metals and organic compounds) of interest in highway runoff loads, however, are not included in the NADP/NTN. Dry deposition, which constitutes a large part of total atmospheric deposition for many constituents in highway runoff loads, is difficult to monitor accurately. Dry-deposition rates are not widely available.

Many of the highway-runoff investigations that have addressed atmospheric-deposition sources have had flawed investigative designs or problems with methodology. Some results may be incorrect because of reliance on time-aggregated data collected during a period of changing atmospheric emissions. None of the investigations used methods that could accurately quantify the part of highway runoff load that can be attributed to ambient atmospheric deposition. Lack of information about accurate ambient deposition rates and runoff loads was part of the problem. Samples collected to compute the rates and loads were collected without clean-sampling methods or sampler protocols, and without quality-assurance procedures that could validate the data. Massbudget calculations comparing deposition and runoff did not consider loss of deposited material during on-highway processing. Loss of deposited particles from highway travel lanes could be large, as has been determined in labeled particle studies, because of resuspension caused by turbulence from passing traffic. Although a cause of resuspension of large particles, traffic turbulence may increase the rate of deposition for small particles and gases by impaction, especially during precipitation periods.

Ultimately, traffic and road maintenance may be determined to be the source of many constituents measured in highway runoff previously attributed to ambient atmospheric deposition. An investigative design using tracers of ambient deposition that are not present in highway traffic sources could determine conclusively what fraction of highway runoff load is contributed by ambient atmospheric deposition.

Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Forms of Deposition and Post-Depositional Transport

Wet Deposition

Dry Deposition

Saltation and Resuspension

Data from Existing Monitoring Programs

Major Inorganic Constituents and Water-Quality Properties

Sources, Importance, and Chemistry

Character of Deposition Data

Uses In Highway-Runoff Investigations

Trace Metals and Cyanide

Sources, Importance, and Chemistry

Character of Deposition Data

Uses in Highway-Runoff Investigations

Organic Compounds

Sources, Importance, and Chemistry

Character of Deposition Data

Uses in Highway-Runoff Investigations

Review of Articles on Atmospheric Sources for Highway Runoff

Comparison of Traffic-Related and Ambient Atmospheric-Deposition Sources

Deposition Rates and Highway Proximity

Mass Balance

Regression Models of Federal Highway Administration Data

On-Highway Processing

Quality Assurance

Strategies and Methods for Future Investigations

Particle Size and Sources

Investigative Design

Tracers of Atmospheric Deposition

Appropriate Network for Data Collection

Site Selection for Sampler Placement

Duration and Frequency of Data Collection

Ancillary Data Requirements

Collector Type and Installation

Wet-Deposition Collectors

Dust Buckets and Bulk Collectors

Impactor Samplers and Standard-Surface Collectors

Quality Assurance

Field-Data Collection

Laboratory Analysis

Summary and Conclusions

References Cited


This report is available online in Portable Document Format (PDF). If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat PDF Reader, it is available for free download from Adobe Systems Incorporated.

Document Accessibility: Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visually impaired. This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools convert Adobe PDF documents into HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text as audible speech. In addition, an accessible version of Acrobat Reader 8.0 for Windows (English only), which contains support for screen readers, is available. These tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at Adobe Access.


Suggested Citation:
Colman, J.A., Rice, K.C., and Willoughby, T.C., 2001, Methodology and significance of studies of atmospheric deposition in highway runoff: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-259, 63 p.


For additional information write to:

Director,
USGS Massachusetts–Rhode Island Water Science Center
10 Bearfoot Road
Northborough, MA 01532

or visit our Web site at:
http://ma.water.usgs.gov



U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL: https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/ofr01259
Page Contact Information: USGS Publishing Network
Last modified: Wednesday, 07-Dec-2016 18:54:02 EST
FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button