Skip past header information
USGS Logo with link to USGS Web page

Coastal Change-Potential Assessment of Sleeping Bear Dunes, Indiana Dunes, and Apostle Islands National Lakeshores to Lake-Level Changes
USGS Open-File Report 2005-1249

Maps of Coastal Change-Potential: Apostle Islands NL, Indiana Dunes NL, Sleeping Bear Dunes NL,

Skip past contents informationTable of Contents Link to Title Page Link to Abstract Page Link to Introduction Page Link to Background of CPI Link to Data Ranking Page Link to the Great Lakes National Lakeshores Page Link to the Methology Page Link to Geology Variables Page Link to Physical Process Variables Page Link to Calculating the CPI Page Link to the Results Page Link to the Discussion Page Link to the Conclusions Page Link to the References Page

Calculating the Change-Potential Index

The coastal change-potential index (CPI) presented here is similar to the CVI used in Thieler and Hammar-Klose (1999) and Gornitz and others (1994), as well as to the sensitivity index employed by Shaw and others (1998). The CPI allows six variables to be related in a quantifiable manner that expresses the relative change potential of the coast to physical changes due to future lake-level change. This method yields numerical data that cannot be equated directly with particular physical effects. It does, however, highlight areas where the various effects of lake-level change may be the greatest. Once each section of coastline is assigned a change-potential value for each specific data variable, the coastal change-potential index (CPI) is calculated as the square root of the product of the ranked variables divided by the total number of variables;

CPI is calculated as the square root of the product of the ranked variables divided by the total number of variables; where, a = geomorphology, b = shoreline erosion/accretion rate, c = coastal slope, d = relative lake-level change rate, e = mean significant wave height, and f = mean annual ice cover.

where, a = geomorphology, b = shoreline erosion/accretion rate, c = coastal slope, d = relative lake-level change rate, e = mean significant wave height, and f = mean annual ice cover. The calculated CPI value is then divided into quartile ranges to highlight different vulnerabilities within the park. The CPI ranges (low - very high) reported here apply specifically to Apostle Islands NL, Indiana Dunes NL, and Sleeping Bear Dunes NL, respectively, and are not comparable to CPI ranges in other parks where the CPI has been employed (i.e. very high change-potential means the same among parks; it's the numeric values that differ). For example, a numeric value that equals very high change potential in one park may equal moderate change potential in another. We believe the approach used in this study best describes and highlights the change-potential specific to individual park units.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2005/1249/html/cpi.htm
Page Contact Information: Publishing Services
Page Last Modified: Saturday, 12-Jan-2013 22:12:46 EST