Link to USGS Home Page


A Precipitation-Runoff Model for Analysis of the Effects of Water Withdrawals on Streamflow, Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts

Thumbnail of report cover

Water Resources-Investigations Report 00-4029

By Phillip J. Zarriello and Kernell G. Ries, III



Water withdrawals from the 155-square-mile Ipswich River Basin in northeastern Massachusetts affect aquatic habitat, water quality, and recreational use of the river. To better understand the effects of these withdrawals on streamflow, particularly low flow, the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF) was used to develop a watershed-scale precipitation-runoff model of the Ipswich River to simulate its hydrology and complex water-use patterns.

An analytical solution was used to compute time series of streamflow depletions resulting from ground-water withdrawals at wells. The flow depletions caused by pumping from the wells were summed along with any surface-water withdrawals to calculate the total withdrawal along a stream reach. The water withdrawals, records of precipitation, and streamflow records on the Ipswich River at South Middleton and at Ipswich for the period 1989–93 were used to calibrate the model. Model-fit analysis indicates that the simulated flows matched observed flows over a wide range of conditions; at a minimum, the coefficient of model-fit efficiency indicates that the model explained 79 percent of the variance in the observed daily flow.

Six alternative water-withdrawal and land-use scenarios were simulated with the model. Three scenarios were examined for the 1989–93 calibration period, and three scenarios were examined for the 1961–95 period to test alternative withdrawals and land use over a wider range of climatic conditions, and to compute 1-, 7-, and 30-day low-flow frequencies using a log-Pearson Type III analysis. Flow-duration curves computed from results of the 1989–93 simulations indicate that, at the South Middleton and Ipswich gaging stations, streamflows when no water withdrawals are being made are nearly identical to streamflows when no ground-water withdrawals are made. Streamflow under no water withdrawals at both stations are about an order of magnitude larger at the 99.8 percent exceedence probability than simulations with only ground-water withdrawals. Long-term simulations indicate that the differences between streamflow with no water withdrawals and average 1989–93 water withdrawals is similar to the difference between simulations for the same water-use conditions made for the 1989–93 period at both sites. The 7-day, 10-year low-flow (7Q10, a widely used regulatory statistic) at the South Middleton station was 4.1 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) with no water withdrawals and 1991 land use, 5.8 ft3/s no withdrawals and undeveloped land, and 0.54 ft3/s with average 1989–93 water withdrawals and 1991 land use. The 7Q10 at the Ipswich station was about 8.3 ft3/s for simulations with no water withdrawals for both the 1991 land use and the undeveloped land conditions, and 2.7 ft3/s for simulations with average 1989–93 water withdrawals and 1991 land use. Simulation results indicate that surface-water withdrawals have little effect on the duration and frequency of low flows, but the cumulative ground-water withdrawals substantially decrease low flows.




Purpose and Scope

Previous Investigations


Description of the Basin

Water Withdrawals

Precipitation-Runoff Model

Functional Description of the HSPF Model

Data Base

Streamflow Data

Meteorologic Data

Water-Withdrawal Data

Representation of the Basin

Hydrologic Response Unit

Impervious Areas (IMPLNDs)

Pervious Areas (PERLNDs)

Development of PERLND Types

Residential Areas on Public Water and Onsite Septic Systems

Stream Reaches

Hydraulic Characteristics (FTABLEs)


Water Withdrawals

Streamflow Depletion by Ground-Water Withdrawals

Water Withdrawals in Excess of Streamflow

Model Calibration

Mean Annual Discharge

Monthly Mean Discharge and Seasonal Water Budgets

Daily Flow

Flow Duration

Low Flows

Miscellaneous Discharge Measurements

Summary of the Differences Between Simulations with Reading and Centroid Precipitation Data

Sensitivity Analysis

Response of Pervious (PERLNDs) and Impervious (IMPLNDs) Land Segments

Parameter Values

Model Limitations

Application of the Model: Effects of Water Withdrawals on Streamflow

Calibration-Period Simulations

Long-term Simulations



Appendix A: Documentation of Computer Program STRMDEPL-A Program to Calculate Streamflow Depletion by Wells Using Analytical Solutions

Appendix B: Ipswich River Watershed Model (HSPF) User Control Input File for PERLND and IMPLND Blocks






This report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). To view and print report you need to use Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as freeware.

Users with visual disabilities can visit this site for conversion tools and information to help make PDF files accessible.


Errata Sheet (May 21, 2004)


Entire Report  in PDF format       (3.8 MB)  - 107 pages

Title Pages  in PDF format           (32 KB) -3 pages

Contents  in PDF format               (136 KB) -4 pages

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL:
Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact
Last modified: Thursday, September 01 2005, 05:01:10 PM
FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button