USGS Home Page


For a complete view of Central Arizona Basins data and for additional information about specific benchmarks used, visit our Web site at Also visit the NAWQA Data Warehouse for access to NAWQA data sets at

This appendix is a summary of chemical concentrations and biological indicators assessed in the Central Arizona Basins. Selected results for this Study Unit are graphically compared to results from as many as 36 NAWQA Study Units investigated from 1991 to 1998 and to national water-quality benchmarks for human health, aquatic life, or fish-eating wildlife. The chemical and biological indicators shown were selected on the basis of frequent detection, detection at concentrations above a national benchmark, or regulatory or scientific importance. The graphs illustrate how conditions associated with each land use sampled in the Central Arizona Basins compare to results from across the Nation, and how conditions compare among the several land uses. Graphs for chemicals show only detected concentrations and, thus, care must be taken to evaluate detection frequencies in addition to concentrations when comparing study-unit and national results. For example, trifluralin concentrations in Central Arizona Basins agricultural streams were similar to the national distribution, but the detection frequency was much higher (76 percent compared to 21 percent). Graph showing  Pesticides in water—Herbicides


Appendix. Pesticides in water—Insecticides


Appendix. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ground water and Nutrients in water


Appendix. Dissolved solids in water and Trace elements in ground water


Appendix. CHEMICALS IN FISH TISSUE AND BED SEDIMENT.  Graph showing Organochlorines in fish tissue (whole body) and bed sediment


Appendix. BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS - Higher national scores suggest habitat disturbance, water-quality degradation, or naturally harsh conditions. The status of algae, invertebrates (insects, worms, and clams), and fish provide a record of water-quality and stream conditions that water-chemistry indicators may not reveal. Algal status focuses on the changes in the percentage of certain algae in response to increasing siltation, and it often correlates with higher nutrient concentrations in some regions. Invertebrate status averages 11 metrics that summarize changes in richness, tolerance, trophic conditions, and dominance associated with water-quality degradation. Fish status sums the scores of four fish metrics (percent tolerant, omnivorous, non-native individuals, and percent individuals with external anomalies) that increase in association with water-quality degradation.


Table of Contents || Previous Section || Next Section || Glossary

U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1213

Suggested citation:

Cordy, G.E., Gellenbeck, D.J., Gebler, J.B., Anning, D.W., Coes, A.L., Edmonds, R.J., Rees, J.A.H., and Sanger, H.W., 2000, Water Quality in the Central Arizona Basins, Arizona, 1995–98: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1213, 38 p., on-line at

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL:
Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
Last modified: Wednesday, November 23 2016, 12:20:54 PM
FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button