December 28, 1976 QUALITY OF WATER BRANCH TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 77.02 Subject: WATER QUALITY--Analytical methods for organic carbon As many of you already know, close examination during the past several months of the results of determinations of total organic carbon (TOC) by WRD laboratories has cast doubt on the validity of some of those analytical values. A recent study of the situation for the Central Laboratories System by Jerry Leenheer has indicated that the primary problem lies in nonrepresentative subsampling of the original sample in the laboratory, and not in the analytical equipment itself or in the analytical procedures used. It is believed now that loss of organic carbon to the container walls through adsorption, precipitation, flocculation, or biological growth, and possibly some conversion of organic carbon to gaseous products through bacterial activity, can occur and has resulted in errors in an unknown fraction of this TOC data Inadequate cleaning of new sample bottles constituted an additional but irregular source of error until the problem was discovered The errors described above are difficult if not impossible to detect for samples in which only TOC was determined. For such samples we have no basis for suspecting any particular determination to be in error, and consequently there is no basis for recommending that any particular value be deleted from the record. The same can be said for values of TOC that are greater than either dissolved organic carbon (DOC) or suspended organic carbon (SOC) when only one or the other determination was made in addition to TOC. However, in the case of TOC values that are significantly less than values of DOC or SOC for the same sample, there is good reason to believe that the TOC value is in error rather than the values of DOC and SOC In order to insure that the organic carbon data in the water quality file are as nearly correct as possible, the following procedure has been agreed upon by the Quality of Water Branch and the Assistant Chief Hydrologist for Scientific Publications and Data Management. A retrieval will be made in the next few weeks of all organic carbon data collected since October 1, 1973. A printout of these data will be sent to the District Offices for review. In cases where DOC or SOC values exceed TOC by 20% or more, the district should delete the TOC values from the file through the district terminal. For samples in which only TOC was determined, there is no adequate basis for deleting any data except for cases in which the district has reason to believe that proper sample collection and preservation procedures Since all data believed to be suspect are to be deleted from the water quality file, we do not believe it is necessary to insert a statement in the remarks section of the next annual basic data report that qualifies TOC data published in previous reports. Revised methods for determination of organic carbon will be released as provisional methods by the Quality of Water Branch in the near future. These hopefully will alleviate many of the problems referred to above. At the same time, separation of the dissolved and suspended phases by filtering in the field will be encouraged by the pricing policy of the Central Laboratories System. Like most other water-quality characteristics that can change while the sample is on its way from the field to the laboratory, it is safest to separate the component parts in the field and derive the total from the sum of the parts--in other words, determine TOC from DOC plus SOC. In addition, the process of filtering the sample through a silver filter helps to prevent changes resulting from bacterial action. It is clear from the above that determination of organic carbon still must be regarded as a somewhat primitive measurement. This certainly is not without precedent in the history of water-quality measurement, but we will continue to strive to improve our methodology with time. R. J. Pickering WRD Distribution: A,B,S,FO,PO