Single-Beam Bathymetry Sounding Data of Cape Canaveral, Florida, (2014) gridded in ESRI ASCII GRID format

Metadata also available as - [Questions & Answers] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Mark Hansen
Publication_Date: 20150920
Title:
Single-Beam Bathymetry Sounding Data of Cape Canaveral, Florida, (2014) gridded in ESRI ASCII GRID format
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular
Series_Information:
Series_Name:
Archive of Bathymetry Data Collected at Cape Canaveral, Florida, 2014
Issue_Identification: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 957
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: St. Petersburg, Florida
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Online_Linkage: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds957
Description:
Abstract:
The Cape Canaveral Coastal System (CCCS) is a prominent feature along the Southeast U.S. coastline and is the only large cape south of Cape Fear, North Carolina. Most of the CCCS lies within the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge and included in its boundaries are the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), NASA’s Kennedy Space Center (KSC), and a large portion of Canaveral National Seashore. The actual promontory of the modern cape falls within the jurisdictional boundaries of the CCAFS. These various agencies have ongoing concerns related to erosion hazards and vulnerability of the system including critical infrastructure, habitats, and recreational and cultural resources.
The USGS conducted a bathymetric mapping survey August 18-20, 2014, in the Atlantic Ocean offshore of Cape Canaveral, Florida (USGS Field Activity Number 2014-324-FA). The study area covered an area extending south from Port Canaveral, Florida, to the northern end of the KSC property and from the shoreline to about 2.5 km offshore. Bathymetric data were collected with single-beam sonar- and lidar-based systems. Two jet skis and a 17-ft outboard motor boat equipped with the USGS SANDS hydrographic system collected precision sonar data. The sonar operations were conducted in three missions, one on each day, with the boat and jet skis operating concurrently. The USGS airborne EAARL-B mapping system flown in a twin engine plane was used to collect lidar data. The lidar operations were conducted in three missions, one in the afternoon of August 19, 2015, and two more in the morning and afternoon of August 20, 2014. The missions were synchronized such that there was some temporal and spatial overlap between the sonar and lidar operations. Additional data were collected to evaluate the actual water clarity corresponding to lidar's ability to receive bathymetric returns.
This dataset serves as an archive of processed single-beam and lidar bathymetry data collected at Cape Canaveral, Florida, in 2014 (in XYZ comma delimited, ASCII and shapefile format). Also included in this archive are Geographic Information System (GIS) data products: gridded map data (in ESRI binary and ASCII grid format), and a color-coded bathymetry map (in PDF format).
Purpose:
The work was conducted as part of a study to describe an updated bathymetric dataset collected in 2014 and compare it to previous data sets. The updated data focus on the bathymetric features and sediment transport pathways that connect the offshore regions to the shoreline and, therefore, are related to the protection of other portions of the coastal environment, such as dunes, that support infrastructure and ecosystems. 
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20140818
Ending_Date: 20140820
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.623608
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.503342
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 28.660641
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 28.402541
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: General
Theme_Keyword: bathymetry
Theme_Keyword: circulation model
Theme_Keyword: hydrology
Theme_Keyword: mapping
Theme_Keyword: SANDS
Theme_Keyword: sediment dynamics
Theme_Keyword: System for Accurate Nearshore Depth Surveying
Theme_Keyword: single beam
Theme_Keyword: echosounder
Theme_Keyword: Transect Viewer
Theme_Keyword: erosion
Theme_Keyword: hydrography
Theme_Keyword: U.S. Geological Survey
Theme_Keyword: USGS
Theme_Keyword: Coastal and Marine Geology Program
Theme_Keyword: CMGP
Theme_Keyword: St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
Theme_Keyword: SPCMSC
Theme_Keyword: lidar
Theme_Keyword: soundings
Theme_Keyword: water depth
Theme_Keyword: EARRL-B
Theme_Keyword: second-generation Experimental Advanced Airborne Research lidar
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: environment
Theme_Keyword: inlandWaters
Theme_Keyword: elevation
Theme_Keyword: geoscientificInformation
Theme_Keyword: imageryBaseMapsEarthCover
Theme_Keyword: oceans
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, Dependencies, Areas of Special Sovereignty, and Their Principal Administrative Divisions, Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 10-4, Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology
Place_Keyword: United States
Place_Keyword: US
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, D.C., NIST
Place_Keyword: Florida
Place_Keyword: FL
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Department of Commerce, 1990, Counties and Equivalent Entities of the United States, Its Possessions, and Associated Areas, FIPS 6-3, Washington, DC, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Place_Keyword: Cape Canaveral
Place_Keyword: Port Canaveral
Place_Keyword: Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
Place_Keyword: Kennedy Space Center
Place_Keyword: Cape Canaveral Coastal System
Place_Keyword: Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge
Place_Keyword: Atlantic Ocean
Access_Constraints:
The U.S. Geological Survey requests that it be referenced as the originator of this dataset in any future products or research derived from these data.
Use_Constraints: These data should not be used for navigational purposes.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502-8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Data_Set_Credit:
This project was funded by the U.S. Air Force, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. David M. Thompson (USGS-St. Petersburg) performed a significant portion of bathymetric survey data collection and processing.
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise, Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.1 Service Pack 1 Build 3143; ESRI ArcCatalog 10.1 (Build 3143)
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Thompson, D.M., Plant, N.G., and Hansen, M.E.
Publication_Date: 20150920
Title:
Analysis of Bathymetric Surveys to Identify Coastal Vulnerabilities at Cape Canaveral, Florida, USGS, Open-File Report 2015-1180
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: multimedia presentation
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: St. Petersburg, FL
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Online_Linkage: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151180

Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
The accuracy of the data is determined during data collection. This dataset is derived from a single research cruise using identical equipment, set-ups, and staff; therefore, the dataset is internally consistent. Methods are employed to maintain data collection consistency aboard the platform. During mobilization, each piece of equipment is isolated to obtain internal and external offset measurements with respect to the survey platform. All the critical measurements are recorded manually and digitally entered into their respective programs. For the single-beam bathymetry, offsets between the single-beam transducers and the Ashtech antenna reference point (ARP) were measured and accounted for in post-processing. Bar checks were performed as calibration efforts and accounted for any drift in the Odum Echosounder. Differential Geographic Positioning System (DGPS) coordinates were obtained using post-processing software packages created by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Online Positioning User Service (OPUS). Boat trajectories were computed with GrafNav© v8.50 software by Novatel, Inc.
These bathymetric data have not been independently verified for accuracy. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The USGS or the U.S. Government shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein.
Logical_Consistency_Report: This dataset was acquired on a single research cruise in 2014.
Completeness_Report:
This is a complete raster grid derived from post-processed x,y,z bathymetric data points acquired with an acoustic single-beam system collected in the Atlantic Ocean offshore of Cape Canaveral, FL.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The GPS antenna and receiver acquisition configuration used at the reference station was duplicated on the survey vessel (rover). The base receiver and the rover receiver record their positions concurrently at 10Hz recording intervals throughout the survey. All processed measurements are referenced to the base station coordinates.
NOAA/NGS CORS stations CCV6 and a new ground-control point or benchmark within the study area were used as reference receiver sites. For this survey, one new benchmark was built using standard benchmarks procedures. GPS base stations were operated within approximately 15 to 20 km of the survey area. New benchmarks positions were surveyed using Ashtech Z-Extreme, 12 channel dual-frequency GPS receivers. Full-phase carrier data were recorded on each occupied benchmark in Ashtech proprietary BIN format with daily occupations ranging from 6 to 12 hours. BIN files were then converted to RINEX-2 format for position processing.
For newly established benchmarks, all static base station GPS sessions were submitted for processing to the NOAA/NGS OPUS software. The base location results from OPUS were entered into a spreadsheet to compute one final positional coordinate and error analysis for that base location. The final positional coordinate (latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid height) is the weighted average of all GPS sessions. For each GPS session, the weighted average was calculated using the OPUS result and the total session time in seconds; therefore, longer GPS occupation times held more value than shorter occupation times. OPUS results are computed relative to IGS08 coordinate system. The established geodetic reference frame for the project was WGS84. Therefore, final reference coordinates used to process the rover data were transformed from IGS08 to WGS84 using National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geodetic Survey (NOAA/NGS) Horizontal Time-Dependent Positioning HTDP software v3.2.3.
OPUS results provide an error measurement for each daily solution. Applying these error measurements, the horizontal accuracy of the base station is estimated to be 0.02 m root mean squared (RMS).
The kinematic (rover) trajectories were processed using GrafNav© v8.50 software by Novatel, Inc. A horizontal error measurement, RMS is computed for each epoch. The horizontal trajectory errors varied between 0 and 0.06 m.
During acquisition, boat motion was measured using a TSS DMS-05© heave, roll, and pitch sensor, which can measure within 0.05 degrees. The TSS data string was captured and recorded in the HYPACK© RAW bathymetry data files. Using USGS Transect Viewer software, the differentially corrected navigation files exported from GrafNav were parsed together by time with the HYPACK© RAW files and then merged together, at which time the TSS measurements were used to geometrically correct the soundings at each differentially corrected position. The uncertainties of the roll and pitch corrections applied to the horizontal position are unknown.
The combined horizontal error from base station coordinate solutions and rover trajectories ranged from 0.02 and 0.08 m, with an average of approximately 0.04 m.
Quantitative_Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Assessment:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Value: 0.04 m
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Explanation:
Static GPS data was processed using NOAA/NGS OPUS software and kinematic GPS data was processed with GrafNav v8.50 software by Novatel.
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The GPS antenna and receiver acquisition configuration used at the reference station was duplicated on the survey vessel (rover). The base receiver and the rover receiver record their positions concurrently at 10Hz recording intervals throughout the survey. All processed measurements are referenced to the base station coordinates.
NOAA/NGS CORS stations CCV6 and a new ground-control point or benchmark within the study area were used as reference receiver sites. For this survey, one new benchmark was built using standard benchmarks procedures. GPS base stations were operated within approximately 15 to 20 km of the survey area. New benchmarks positions were surveyed using Ashtech Z-Extreme©, 12 channel dual-frequency GPS receivers. Full-phase carrier data were recorded on each occupied benchmark in Ashtech proprietary BIN format with daily occupations ranging from 6 to 12 hours. BIN files were then converted to RINEX-2 format for position processing.
For newly established benchmarks, all static base station GPS sessions were submitted for processing to the NOAA/NGS OPUS software. The base location results from OPUS were entered into a spreadsheet to compute one final positional coordinate and error analysis for that base location. The final positional coordinate (latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid height) is the weighted average of all GPS sessions. For each GPS session, the weighted average was calculated using the OPUS result and the total session time in seconds; therefore, longer GPS occupation times held more value than shorter occupation times. OPUS results are computed relative to IGS08 coordinate system. The established geodetic reference frame for the project was WGS84. Therefore, final reference coordinates used to process the rover data were transformed from IGS08 to WGS84 using National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geodetic Survey (NOAA/NGS) Horizontal Time-Dependent Positioning HTDP software v3.2.3.
OPUS results provide an error measurement for each daily solution. Applying these error measurements, the vertical accuracy of the base station is estimated to be 0.02 m root mean squared (RMS).
The kinematic (rover) trajectories were processed using GrafNav© v8.50 software by Novatel, Inc. A vertical error measurement, RMS is computed for each epoch. The horizontal trajectory errors varied between 0 and 0.14 m.
During acquisition, boat motion was measured using a TSS DMS-05© heave, roll, and pitch sensor, which can measure within 0.05 degrees. The TSS data string was captured and recorded in the HYPACK RAW bathymetry data files. Using USGS Transect Viewer software, the differentially-corrected navigation files exported from GrafNav were parsed together by time with the HYPACK RAW files and then merged together, at which time the TSS measurements were used to geometrically correct the soundings at each differentially-corrected position. The uncertainties of the roll and pitch corrections applied to the vertical position are unknown.
The combined vertical error from base station coordinate solutions and rover trajectories ranged from 0 and 0.14 m, with an average of approximately 0.07 m.
Quantitative_Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Assessment:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Value: 0.07 m
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Explanation:
Static GPS data was processed using NOAA/NGS OPUS software and kinematic GPS data was processed with GrafNav v8.50 software by Novatel.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 2015
Title:
Archive of Bathymetry Data Collected at Cape Canaveral, Florida, 2014
Type_of_Source_Media: digital tabular data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20140818
Ending_Date: 20140820
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS
Source_Contribution: Original processed single-beam bathymetric data.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Data Acquisition - The sea floor offshore of Cape Canaveral was mapped by using a 17-ft outboard motor boat and two jet skis, equipped with a high-precision Global Positioning Systems (GPS) coupled with a high-precision depth sounder. To accomplish this task, the SANDS (System for Accurate Nearshore Depth Surveying) system was developed by Mark Hansen (SPCMSC) and Jeff List (WHSC) of the U.S. Geological Survey. SANDS consists of two components, hardware and processing techniques.
Survey track lines were spaced 500-meters apart and orientated shore normal along the project area. Track lines collected parallel to the coast (intersecting track lines) functioned to serve as a cross-check and to assess the relative vertical accuracy of the survey. Crossing lines are critical because they serve as a check on the internal accuracy of the data. Soundings were collected along each track line at a 0.5 m spacing. In shallow areas, data were collected in a minimum of 0.5 m water depth except where there was potential damage to the bottom environment or the boat/motors.
GPS reference stations were NGS/CORS station CCV6 and a temporary benchmark, which was located within about 15 km of the farthest single-beam track line. Reference and rover GPS receivers recorded the 12-channel full-carrier-phase positioning signals (L1/L2) from satellites via Thales choke-ring antennas. The reference and rover receivers record their positions concurrently at 1-second(s) recording intervals throughout the survey.
Boat motion was recorded at 50-millisecond (ms) intervals using a TSS Dynamic Motion Sensor 05 (TSS DMS-05©). Bathymetric soundings were recorded at 10-ms intervals using an Odum survey grade echo-sounder. The single-beam data were acquired using the hydrographic software HYPACK© version 10. All data strings from the instruments were streamed in real time and recorded through HYPACK© software.
Process_Date: 20150130
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation:
Raw sensor data files in ASCII text format and GPS Carrier-phase data in binary format.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Person: Nathaniel Plant
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502-8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: nplant@usgs.gov
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Differentially Corrected Navigation Processing - The coordinate values of the reference GPS base stations obtained from OPUS were provided in the IGS08 coordinate system. All survey data for the project were referenced to WGS84. Consequently, reference station coordinate were transformed to WGS84 coordinates using the NOAA/NGS software HTDP v3.2.3. The respective reference (base) station coordinates utilized as reference positions were imported into GrafNav© v8.50 software by Novatel. Differentially corrected rover trajectories were computed by merging the master and rover the GPS data. During processing, steps were taken to ensure that the trajectories between the base and rover were clean, resulting in fixed positions. By analyzing the graphs, trajectory maps, and processing logs that GrafNav produces for each GPS session, GPS data from satellites flagged by the program as having poor health or satellite time segments that had cycle slips could be excluded, or the satellite elevation mask angle could be adjusted to improve the position solutions. The final differentially corrected precise DGPS positions were computed for each rover GPS session and exported in ASCII text format.
Process_Date: 20150130
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Boat trajectory data files in ASCII text format.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 727-502-8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Single-beam Bathymetry Processing - All data were processed using USGS in-house software called Transect Viewer. The primary purpose of Transect Viewer is to time synchronize processed trajectories, soundings, and heave/pitch/roll, and then merge all data strings. Transect Viewer applies latency errors, geometric corrections for antenna staff pitch and roll, geometric corrections for antenna transducer pitch and roll (beam correction), time synchronizes the GPS trajectory and HYPACK© files for each GPS epoch, and applies a geoid separation based upon NOAA/NGS Geoid12a model. Final output is a comma-delimited text file containing: longitude(WGS84-G1150), latitude(WGS84-G1150), ellipsoid_ht(WGS84-G1150), orthometric_ht(G12a). For the orthometric height, elevations are assumed to be relative to NAVD88 via the Geoid12a model. A header line indicates the attributes entry for each column.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
The combination of intermediate input files were created and used such as: post-processed differential navigation and unprocessed HYPACK© RAW bathymetric data.
Process_Date: 20150210
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation:
Final, processed bathymetry data files in ASCII text format. Canaveral_2014-324-FA_sonarASCIIgrd.zip
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: David Thompson
Contact_Organization:
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) - St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502-8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: dthompson@usgs.gov
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The sounding data were entered into ArcMap© version 10.1 (a gridding and contouring software package) ARCMap© (ESRI) and saved as an ASCII text file in ESRI’s GRID format.
Process_Date: 20150210
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502-8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster
Raster_Object_Information:
Raster_Object_Type: Grid Cell
Row_Count: 519
Column_Count: 212
Vertical_Count: 1

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
UTM_Zone_Number: 17
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -81.0
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.02
False_Easting: 500000.001
False_Northing: 0.0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: row and column
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 55.0127828
Ordinate_Resolution: 55.0127828
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North_American_1983
Ellipsoid_Name: GRS1980
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.0
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222101
Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Depth_System_Definition:
Depth_Datum_Name: NAVD88
Depth_Resolution: 0.001
Depth_Distance_Units: meters
Depth_Encoding_Method: Explicit depth coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Canaveral_2014-324-FA_sonarASCIIgrd.zip
Entity_Type_Definition:
Post-processed, area-specific x,y,z attributed gridded single-beam bathymetry data in ASCII text file ESRI’s GRID format.
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Band_1
Attribute_Definition:
Table containing attribute information associated with the dataset
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: -14.4146767
Range_Domain_Maximum: -0.6922758
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: meters
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.001

Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark E. Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502-8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Resource_Description: 2014 bathymetric data
Distribution_Liability:
The data have no explicit or implied guarantees. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The USGS or the U.S. Government shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name:
https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/0957/downloads/Grids/Canaveral_2014-324-FA_sonarASCIIgrd.zip
Fees: none

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20150916
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502-8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Geological Survey requests that it be referenced as the originator of this dataset in any future products or research derived from these data.
Metadata_Security_Information:
Metadata_Security_Classification_System: None
Metadata_Security_Classification: Unclassified
Metadata_Security_Handling_Description: None

Generated by mp version 2.9.32 on Tue Oct 6 09:44:22 2015