Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Mark Hansen
Publication_Date: 2015
Title: Swath Bathymetry Sounding Data of Shark River and Trout Creek, Florida (2004) in XYZ format
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Archive of Bathymetry Data Collected in South Florida from 1995 to 2015
Issue_Identification: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series–1031
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: St. Petersburg, Florida
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Online_Linkage: https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/1031/download/TidalCreek/soundings/DS1031–TidalCreek–TroutC_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH_shp.xyz.zip
Description:
Abstract:
During the past century, river and tidal creeks through the coastal wetlands of the Everglades have filled with sediment and vegetation of surrounding landscapes to the point that many have greatly diminished or disappeared entirely. Restoration plans are under consideration to redirect additional freshwater inflow from the Everglades to open and sustain these waterways to a level that closely resembles historic patterns. The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has developed hydrodynamic numerical models to help define the restoration plan and oversees monitoring to assess restoration impacts.
This report serves as an archive of processed Swath bathymetry data that were collected in Shark River and Trout Creek, Florida in 2004. Geographic information system data products include XYZ data. Additional files include formal Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) metadata.
Purpose: This project had two primary objectives. The first was to establish mapping protocols which will provide accurate, consistent information about various channels and changes in channels through time that can be used in Everglades process modeling and restoration impact monitoring. The second was to evaluate and analyze accurate and cost–effective survey methods for determining channel surface area, and cross–section morphology using boat based and airborne remote sensing techniques. Shark River and Trout Creek in (Florida Bay) were selected as the study locations for the project. This project supports two primary restoration objectives: hydrodynamic modeling and monitoring. Hydrodynamic models will be used to simulate river and tidal creek levels, flows and salinities to guide these restoration efforts. These hydrodynamic models require high–resolution boundary conditions to produce accurate results. Monitoring changes in coastal channel and creek systems is necessary because of uncertainty regarding the flow volumes necessary to sustain them.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2004
Currentness_Reference: Data assumed to be constant over time but may change due to geologic processes.
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: –81.183
East_Bounding_Coordinate: –80.500
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.417
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.183
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: General
Theme_Keyword: bathymetry
Theme_Keyword: circulation model
Theme_Keyword: hydrology
Theme_Keyword: mapping
Theme_Keyword: sediment dynamics
Theme_Keyword: swath
Theme_Keyword: interferometric
Theme_Keyword: echosounder
Theme_Keyword: erosion
Theme_Keyword: hydrography
Theme_Keyword: U.S. Geological Survey
Theme_Keyword: USGS
Theme_Keyword: Coastal and Marine Geology Program
Theme_Keyword: CMGP
Theme_Keyword: St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
Theme_Keyword: SPCMSC
Theme_Keyword: soundings
Theme_Keyword: elevation
Theme_Keyword: sea floor
Theme_Keyword: orthometric
Theme_Keyword: water depth
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: environment
Theme_Keyword: inlandWaters
Theme_Keyword: elevation
Theme_Keyword: geoscientificInformation
Theme_Keyword: imageryBaseMapsEarthCover
Theme_Keyword: oceans
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Department of Commerce, 2001, Countries, Dependencies, Areas of
Special Sovereignty, and Their Principal Administrative Divisions,
Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 10–4, Washington,
D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology
Place_Keyword: United States
Place_Keyword: US
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of
the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the
United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing
Standard 5–2): Washington, D. C., NIST
Place_Keyword: Florida
Place_Keyword: FL
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Department of Commerce, 1990, Counties and Equivalent Entities of
the United States, Its Possessions, and Associated Areas, FIPS 6–3,
Washington, DC, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Place_Keyword: Atlantic Ocean
Place_Keyword: Shark River
Place_Keyword: Trout Creek
Place_Keyword: Florida Bay
Place_Keyword: Gulf of Mexico
Place_Keyword: Blackwater Sound
Access_Constraints: The U.S. Geological Survey requests that it be referenced as the originator of this dataset in any future products or research derived from these data.
Use_Constraints: These data should not be used for navigational purposes.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 Fourth Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502–8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Data_Set_Credit: South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) provided funding for the study. The project was conducted as a cooperative study by personnel from the USGS in St. Petersburg, FL, USGS in Woods Hole, MA, and the SFWMD, in Fort Myers, FL. Mark Hansen was the USGS principal investigator. Gina Perry performed a significant portion of bathymetric survey data collection and processing. David Nichols and Chuck Wooley provided critical field data assistance.
Native_Data_Set_Environment: Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise, Service Pack 1; ESRI ArcGIS 10.2.1 Build 3497
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report: The accuracy of the data is determined during data collection. This dataset is from one research cruise and is therefore internally consistent. Methods are employed to maintain data collection consistency aboard the platform. During mobilization, each piece of equipment is isolated to obtain internal and external offset measurements with respect to the survey platform. All the critical measurements are recorded manually and digitally entered into their respective programs. For the interferometric swath bathymetry, offsets between the sonar head and the DGPS antennas were measured and entered into the SeaSwath acquisition internal setup program. Precise trajectories were provided by post–processing dual–frequency phase GPS data recorded by the reference station and rover receivers. These bathymetric data have not been independently verified for accuracy.
Logical_Consistency_Report: This dataset was acquired on single research cruise in 2004 with identical hardware and software systems.
Completeness_Report: These are complete post–processed X,Y,Z bathymetric data points acquired with a acoustic swath bathymetric system collected in 2004 on the Shark River and Trout Creek, Florida.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The GPS antenna and receiver acquisition configuration used at the reference station was duplicated on the survey vessel (rover). The base receiver and the rover receiver record their positions concurrently at 1Hz recording intervals throughout the survey. All processed measurements are referenced to the base station coordinates.
GPS base or differential reference stations were operated within approximately 15 to 20 km of the survey area. Two new temporary ground–control points or benchmarks (surveyed to within 1 cm to 2 cm accuracy) were established throughout the study area for use as reference receiver sites using standard benchmarks procedures. The new benchmarks were surveyed using Ashtech Z–12, 12 channel dual–frequency GPS receivers. Full–phase carrier data were recorded on each occupied benchmark in Ashtech proprietary BIN format with daily occupations ranging from 6 to 12 hours. BIN files were then converted to RINEX–2 format for position processing.
All static base station GPS sessions were submitted for processing to the online OPUS, GIPSY, and SCOUT system software. The computed base location results were entered into a spreadsheet to compute one final positional coordinate and error analysis for that base location. The final positional coordinate (latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid height) is the weighted average of all GPS sessions. For each GPS session, the weighted average was calculated from the total session time in seconds; therefore, longer GPS occupation times held more value than shorter occupation times. Results were computed relative to ITRF00 coordinate system. The established geodetic reference frame for the project was WGS84. Therefore, final reference coordinates used to process the rover data were transformed from ITRF00 to WGS84 using National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geodetic Survey(NOAA/NGS) HTDP software v2.1.
OPUS, GIPSY, and SCOUT results provide an error measurement for each daily solution. Applying these error measurements, the horizontal accuracy of the base station is estimated to be 0.04 (m) root mean squared (RMS).
The kinematic (rover) trajectories were processed using PNAV v2.0, by ASHTECH, Inc. A horizontal error measurement, RMS is computed for each epoch. The horizontal trajectory errors for varied between 0 and 0.08(m).
The combined horizontal error from base station coordinate solutions and rover trajectories range from 0 and 0.12 (m), with the average approximately 0.06 (m).
Quantitative_Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Assessment:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Value: 0.04
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Explanation: Static GPS data was processed using OPUS, GIPSY, and SCOUT software and kinematic GPS data was processed with PNAV v2.0 software by ASHTECH, Inc. and SwathPlus by SEA, Inc.
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The GPS antenna and receiver acquisition configuration used at the reference station was duplicated on the survey vessel (rover). The base receiver and the rover receiver record their positions concurrently at 1Hz recording intervals throughout the survey. All processed measurements are referenced to the base station coordinates.
GPS base or differential reference stations were operated within approximately 15 to 20 km of the survey area. Five new temporary ground–control points or benchmarks (surveyed to within 1 cm to 2 cm accuracy) were established throughout the study area for use as reference receiver sites using standard benchmarks procedures. The new benchmarks were surveyed using Ashtech Z–12, 12 channel dual–frequency GPS receivers. Full–phase carrier data were recorded on each occupied benchmark in Ashtech proprietary BIN format with daily occupations ranging from 6 to 12 hours. BIN files were then converted to RINEX–2 format for position processing.
All static base station GPS sessions were submitted for processing to the online OPUS, GIPSY, and SCOUT system software. The computed base location results were entered into a spreadsheet to compute one final positional coordinate and error analysis for that base location. The final positional coordinate (latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid height) is the weighted average of all GPS sessions. For each GPS session, the weighted average was calculated from the total session time in seconds; therefore, longer GPS occupation times held more value than shorter occupation times. Results were computed relative to ITRF00 coordinate system. The established geodetic reference frame for the project was WGS84. Therefore, final reference coordinates used to process the rover data were transformed from ITRF00 to WGS84 using National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geodetic Survey(NOAA/NGS) HTDP software v2.1.
OPUS, GIPSY, and SCOUT results provide an error measurement for each daily solution. Applying these error measurements, the vertical accuracy of the base station is estimated to be 0.04 (m) root mean squared (RMS).
The kinematic (rover) trajectories were processed using PNAV v2.0, by ASHTECH, Inc. A vertical error measurement, RMS is computed for each epoch. The vertical trajectory errors for varied between 0 and 0.08(m).
The combined vertical error from base station coordinate solutions and rover trajectories range from 0 and 0.14 (m), with the average approximately 0.08 (m).
Quantitative_Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Assessment:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Value: 0.08
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Explanation: Static GPS data was processed using OPUS, GIPSY, and SCOUT software and kinematic GPS data was processed with PNAV v2.0 software by ASHTECH, Inc. and SwathPlus by SEA, Inc.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: Unpublished material
Title: 2004 Shark River and Trout Creek, Florida swath bathmetry
Type_of_Source_Media: digital tabular data
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS Shark River and Trout Creek, Florida bathymetry
Source_Contribution: Original processed swath bathymetric data
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Swath Bathymetry Acquisition: The interferometric swath bathymetry data were collected aboard the R/V Streeterville using a Systems Engineering and Assessment Ltd (SEA) SWATHplus 468 kHz interferometric sonar system mounted on a pole that was attached to the bow of the boat. Boat motion was recorded at 50–millisecond (ms) intervals using a TSS Dynamic Motion Sensor 05 (TSS DMS–05). GPS and motion data strings from the instruments were streamed in real time and recorded through HYPACK software. Pseudo range GPS data acquired by the Ashetch Z–Surveyor receiver with a Dorne–Margolin choke ring antenna, and motion data were integrated with interferometric soundings in the SWATHplus software package versions 2.2 with positional and calibration offsets pre–defined by a session file(.sxs), allowing for real–time–corrected depths. Prior to deployment, all equipment offsets were surveyed in dry dock with the use of a laser total station. During the survey all swath tracklines were recorded in SEA SWATHplus raw data format (.sxr). An Applied Microsystem SV Smart Sensor, Sound Velocity Sensor (SVS) was attached to the transducer mount and collected continuous speed of sound (SOS) measurements at the depth of the transducers. These values were directly read and incorporated into the SWATHplus acquisition software giving real–time speed of sound at the transducer while underway.
Process_Date: 2004
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Raw sensor data and GPS carrier–phase data in binary format.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502–8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Differentially Corrected Navigation Processing– The coordinate values of the reference GPS base stations obtained from OPUS were provided in the ITRF00 coordinate system. All survey data for the project was referenced to WGS84. Consequently, reference station coordinates were transformed to WGS84 coordinates using the NOAA/NGS software HTDP v1.3. The respective reference (base) station coordinates utilized as reference positions were imported into PNAV v2.0 software by ASHTECH, Inc. Differentially corrected rover trajectories were computed by merging the master and rover the GPS data. During processing, steps were taken to ensure that the trajectories between the base and rover were clean, resulting in fixed positions. By analyzing the graphs, trajectory maps, and processing logs that GrafNav produces for each GPS session, GPS data from satellites flagged by the program as having poor health or satellite time segments that had cycle slips could be excluded, or the satellite elevation mask angle could be adjusted to improve the position solutions. The final differentially corrected precise DGPS positions were computed for each rover GPS session and exported in ASCII text format.
Process_Date: 2004
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Boat trajectory data files in ASCII text format.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 Fourth St. South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 727–502–8000
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 727–502–8032
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Swath Bathymetry Processing: The corrected trajectory positions, motion data, and sound velocity information were then integrated with the observed bathymetric values to calculate a final ellipsoid height and position representing the elevation of the seafloor with respect to the geodetic reference frame ITRF05 across the swath range. SWATHplus serves as both an acquisition software and initial processing software. Preliminary roll calibration trackline data were collected and processed using SWATHplus and Grid Processor software version 3.7.17. Instrument offset and calibrations values were input into the session file (.sxs) and the raw data files (.sxr) were then processed using the updated system configuration containing roll calibration values, measured equipment offsets, acquisition parameters, navigation and motion from the GPS, motion sensor, and SOS probe at the sonar head. Any calibration offsets or acoustic filtering applied in SWATHplus is also written to the processed data file (.sxp).
All processed data files were imported into SEA Grid Processor and edited for outliers using the program's depth filters and reference surfaces. Any remaining outliers were then edited out manually. A surface grid was created from the edited soundings dataset. The sample X,Y,Z data were exported as ASCII text at a 5 x 5 m sample resolution.
Process_Date: 2004
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: Swath processed data in SWATHplus binary format.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502–8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Datum Transformation: The final processed bathymetry files were reformatted for publication. UTM coordinate were converted to latitude/longitude using NOAA/NGS UTMS v2.0 software. Vertical positions were transformed to NAVD88 using National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Geodetic Survey GEOID12a software. Shapefiles were created from X,Y,Z text files using in–house developed software.
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: DS1031–TidalCreek–TroutC_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.txt, DS1031–TidalCreek–SharkR_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.txt, DS1031–TidalCreek–TroutC_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.shp, DS1031–TidalCreek–SharkR_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.shp
Process_Date: 2015
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502–8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 2249804
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Geographic:
Latitude_Resolution: 0.0000001
Longitude_Resolution: 0.0000001
Geographic_Coordinate_Units: decimal degrees
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: WGS84–G1150
Ellipsoid_Name: WGS84
Semi–major_Axis: 6378137.0
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257223563
Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Depth_System_Definition:
Depth_Datum_Name: NAVD88
Depth_Resolution: 0.01
Depth_Distance_Units: meters
Depth_Encoding_Method: Explicit depth coordinate included with horizontal coordinates
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: DS1031–TidalCreek–TroutC_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.txt, DS1031–TidalCreek–SharkR_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.txt, DS1031–TidalCreek–TroutC_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.shp, DS1031–TidalCreek–SharkR_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH.xyz.shp
Entity_Type_Definition: Post–processed, area–specific X,Y,Z attributed swath bathymetry data.
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: USGS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FID
Attribute_Definition: Field ID
Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 2249804
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: longitude
Attribute_Definition: WGS84(G1150) x–coordinate (easting) of sample point
Attribute_Definition_Source: NOAA/NGS UTMS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: –81.183
Range_Domain_Maximum: –80.300
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: decimal degrees
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.00000001
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: latitude
Attribute_Definition: WGS84(G1150) y–coordinate (northing) of sample point
Attribute_Definition_Source: NOAA/NGS UTMS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 25.183
Range_Domain_Maximum: 25.417
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: decimal degrees
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.00000001
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: z–ellipsoid height
Attribute_Definition: WGS84(G1150) ellipsoid height of sample point, in meters
Attribute_Definition_Source: SANDS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: –25.476
Range_Domain_Maximum: –30.298
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: meters
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.001
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: z–NAVD88
Attribute_Definition: Orthometric height of sample point, in meters. Relative to geoid model Geoid99.
Attribute_Definition_Source: SANDS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: –1.107
Range_Domain_Maximum: –5.812
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: meters
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.001
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Mark E. Hansen
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 600 Fourth St. South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502–8000
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (727) 502–8032
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Resource_Description: Single–beam bathymetry, vessel (R/V Streeterville) acquired bathymetric data.
Distribution_Liability: The data have no explicit or implied guarantees. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The USGS or the U.S. Government shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/1031/download/TidalCreek/soundings/DS1031–TidalC–TroutCreek_WGS84_NAVD88–G99_SWATH_shp.xyz.zip
Fees: none
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20150201
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Person: Mark Hansen
Contact_Position: Oceanographer
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 600 4th Street South
City: St. Petersburg
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 33701
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (727) 502–8000
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mhansen@usgs.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC–STD–001–1998
Metadata_Use_Constraints: The U.S. Geological Survey requests that it be referenced as the originator of this dataset in any future products or research derived from these data.
Metadata_Security_Information:
Metadata_Security_Classification_System: None
Metadata_Security_Classification: Unclassified
Metadata_Security_Handling_Description: None