Geology and surrounding recent marine sediments of Anacapa Island

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Geology and surrounding recent marine sediments of Anacapa Island
Abstract:
"Anacapa Island lies nearly twelve miles off the southern California coast along latitude 34 00'30"N. It is the easternmost member of the four Santa Barbara Islands and is also the closest to shore of the eight California channel islands. The island is approximately five miles in length but is only 1.05 square miles in area. Two gaps divide the island into smaller eastern, central, and western islands. The western island has a summit elevation of 930 feet, and it is the highest and largest of the three. Drainage is principally to the north by intermittent resequent streams. Prominent wave-cut terraces are present at elevations of about 600 and 250 feet. The higher terrace is present only on the western island, but the lower terrace occurs on each of the islands and forms a summit platform atop the central and eastern islands. The insular Anacapa shelf includes about thirty-six square miles of the surrounding shallow submerged sea floor. North of the island the shelf is approximately three miles wide, but the southern shelf is less than half this width. To the west, the shelf area extends beneath Acapaca Passage and merges with the shelf of neighboring Santa Cruz Island. The shelf area east of the island is poorly defined. Declivities of the northern and the southern shelves average about 1 degree 40' out to a depth of about 270 feet. The outer edge of the southern shelf usually occurs at this depth, but north of the island a two-mile wide terrace with an overall gradient of 0 degrees 5' extends to near the shelf edge, which occurs at an average depth of 300 feet. Other flattenings of the shelf are present at depths of 60, 100, 180, and 330 feet. The submarine terraces are thought to be wave-cut features of Wisconsin age. Lower Middle Miocene andesitic lavas and pyroclastic rocks of the Conejo formation form the bulk of Anacapa Island. Approximately 1700 feet of this formation is exposed on the south side of the western island. Near the base of the volcanic series are two interbeds of San Onofre breccia, which are separated from each other by 100 to 150 feet of eruptive rocks. This formation crops out on the western and central islands; each unit of the formation has a maximum thickness of thirty five or forty feet. Fossiliferous Lower Pleistocene terrace deposits overlie the San Onofre breccia on the central island. The marine deposits are overlain in turn by Upper Pleistocene and Recent nonmarine terrace sands. The geology of the submerged insular shelf is similar to the island proper except for outcrops of the Monterey formation beneath Anacapa Passage. Most submarine outcrops occur on the shelf areas east and west of the island, where a thin veneer of Recent and relict Pleistocene sediments is present. A paucity of rock bottom north of the island indicates a thick cover of Recent sediment. Anacapa is essentially a gentle north-dipping (2-20 degree) sequence of volcanic rocks, and it is structurally related to the other Santa Barbara Islands and to the Santa Monica Mountains. The islands and the Santa Monica Mountains form the structural province of Anacapia and also the western portion of the Transverse Range Physiographic Province. Unconsolidated sediments overlying the insular shelf are characterized by an average median diameter of 0.360 mm, a sorting coefficient of 1.73, a carbonate content of 45.5 percent, and a 0.7 percent organic matter content. Calcium carbonate and organic matter increase with distance from the island. Median diameters decrease with increasing depth north and south of the island, but increase with distance to the east and west. Detrital sediments or deposits which have carbonate contents less than fifty percent occur principally north and south of the island. They are coarsest to the south because grains smaller than about 0.125 mm tend to bypass the narrow and rather steeply sloping southern shelf. Calcareous sediment types are characteristic of the eastern and western shelf areas where an environment of nondetrital sedimentation prevails. Most of the calcareous matter is composed of mollusk fragments, Lithothamnium debris, bryozoan zoaria, and echinoid spines and plates. Foraminifera also contribute, but they are most abundant in the sediments near the outer edges of the northern and southern shelves.
Supplemental_Information:
Samples collected aboard the R/V Velero IV; Data digitized by the USGS for inclusion into usSEABED (<http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/usseabed>)
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Scholl, David W. , 1959, Geology and surrounding recent marine sediments of Anacapa Island: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Ship, office, and laboratory facilities support from the Allan Hancock Foundation.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -119.4944
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -119.2617
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 34.0764
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 33.9647

  3. What does it look like?

    Scholl_MS_59 (.jpg)
    Sample distribution with coastline and bathymetry for reference.

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 1957
    Ending_Date: 1958
    Currentness_Reference: Publication date

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Paper

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):

      • Entity point (98)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.00028. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.00028. Latitude and longitude values are specified in decimal degrees.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    Point
    SDTS point (Source: Source report)

    AHF Sta. #
    Station number (Source: Allan Hancock Foundation)

    Sequential alpha numeric code

    Median
    Median grainsize distribution (Source: Source report)

    Range of values
    Minimum:-2.0
    Maximum:4.8
    Units:Phi
    Resolution:0.1

    CaCO3
    CaCO3 in sample (Source: Allison, 1935)

    Range of values
    Minimum:5.1
    Maximum:93.9
    Units:Percent
    Resolution:0.1

    Organic matter
    Organic matter (Source: Allison, 1935)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0.27
    Maximum:3.98
    Units:Percent
    Resolution:0.01

    Lithologic descriptions
    Lithologic descriptions of rock samples (Source: Source report)

    Written descriptions


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    David W. Scholl at University of Southern California for the collection and analysis of data. For inclusion into usSEABED: digitization: Adam Jackson (USGS); Formatting corrections: Jane Reid (USGS) and Chris Jenkins (University of Colorado).

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    David W. Scholl
    Now at the U.S. Geological Survey (emeritus)
    345 Middlefield Road, MS 999
    Menlo Park, CA 94025

    650-329-4762 (voice)
    dscholl@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

"Until this study, Anacapa Island, one of the smallest of [the eight islands off the southern California coast] had never been mapped geologically and little was known of its shelf sediments."


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Unknown (process 1 of 1)
    "Textural parameters of sandy sediments were determined with the Emery Settling Tube (Emery, 1938). Finer-grained sediments were analyzed by the pipette method (Krumbein and Pettijohn, 1938). ... Gravels were further divided into grade sizes with additional screening. Carbonate content was measure by leaching a known weight of sediment with dilute hydrochloric acid. Any weight loss after treatment and filtration was calculated as precent calcium carbonate. ... Organic carbon was determined by the potassium dichromate reduction technique described by Allison (1935). Organic carbon percentages were multiplied by a factor of 1.7 to convert to total organic matter (Emery and Rittenberg, 1952)".

    Person who carried out this activity:

    David W. Scholl
    Now at the U.S. Geological Survey (emeritus)
    345 Middlefield Road, MS 999
    Menlo Park, CA 94025

    650-329-4762 (voice)
    dscholl@usgs.gov

    Data sources used in this process:
    • Allison, 1935
    • Emery, 1938
    • Emery and Rittenberg, 1952
    • Krumbein and Pettijohn, 1941

    Data sources produced in this process:

    • Scholl_MS_59

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Locations, descriptions, statistical data were digitized by hand (typed in), visually compared to source and corrected as needed. Where appropriate, data were tested for completeness using MS Excel.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    Navigational techniques not noted in the report. Locations given to degrees, minutes, seconds.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    Depth determination techniques not noted in the report. Water depths not given.

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    No assessment made for original report. For usSEABED, appendices 1 and 2 were completely digitized. Some information from the report text may also be included in usSEABED.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    Data fall within normal ranges for analytical results.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints:
None. Thesis is available at the USGS Library and some libraries.
Use_Constraints:
Cite David W. Scholl and the University of Southern California as originators of the data.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    University of Southern California
    Zumberge Hall
    Los Angeles, CA 90089

    213-740-6106 (voice)

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    D. Scholl MS thesis 1959

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    Although this dataset has been used by the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy of the data. Users of the data should be aware of limitations of the data due to possible imprecision due to navigational inaccuracies and limitations of the statistical data.

  4. How can I download or order the data?

  5. What hardware or software do I need in order to use the data set?

    None


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 2005
Metadata author:
U.S. Geological Survey
c/o Jane A. Reid
Geologist
400 Natural Bridges Drive
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

831-427-4727 (voice)
jareid@usgs.gov

Contact_Instructions: email preferred
Metadata standard:
CSDGM Version 2 (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


Generated by mp version 2.8.17 on Sat May 20 21:34:26 2006