Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS)
Publication_Date: 20070724
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Lincoln County,
Oklahoma
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Other_Citation_Details: ok081
Online_Linkage: URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Description:
Abstract:
This dataset is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps by using remotely
sensed and other information.
This dataset consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a 7.5 minute
quadrangle format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and nonsoil areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but substantially are large
enough and contrasting enough to substantially influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and properties.
Purpose:
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of
soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO
product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Supplemental_Information:
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other
associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO dataset may be
available from the primary organization listed in the Point of
Contact.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20030128
Ending_Date: 20070724
Currentness_Reference: publication date
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.250
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -96.500
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 36.000
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 35.375
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: soil survey
Theme_Keyword: soils
Theme_Keyword: Soil Survey Geographic
Theme_Keyword: SSURGO
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Counties and County Equivalents of the States of the United
States and the District of Columbia (FIPS Pub 6-3)
Place_Keyword: Oklahoma
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Counties and County Equivalents of the States of the United
States and the District of Columbia (FIPS Pub 6-3)
Place_Keyword: Lincoln County
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: USGS Topographic Map Names Database
Place_Keyword: Coyle Quadrangle (s3509707)
Place_Keyword: Perkins Quadrangle (s3509708)
Place_Keyword: Tryon North Quadrangle (s3509601)
Place_Keyword: Cushing Quadrangle (s3509602)
Place_Keyword: North Village Quadrangle (s3509603)
Place_Keyword: Drumright Quadrangle (s3509604)
Place_Keyword: Meridian Quadrangle (s3509715)
Place_Keyword: Carney Quadrangle (s3509716)
Place_Keyword: Tryon South Quadrangle (s3509609)
Place_Keyword: Kendrick Quadrangle (s3509610)
Place_Keyword: Stroud North Quadrangle (s3509611)
Place_Keyword: Depew Quadrangle (s3509612)
Place_Keyword: Luther Quadrangle (s3509723)
Place_Keyword: Wellston Quadrangle (s3509724)
Place_Keyword: Chandler Quadrangle (s3509617)
Place_Keyword: Davenport Quadrangle (s3509618)
Place_Keyword: Stroud South Quadrangle (s3509619)
Place_Keyword: Ritts Junction Quadrangle (s3509620)
Place_Keyword: Horseshoe Lake Quadrangle (s3509731)
Place_Keyword: Luther SE Quadrangle (s3509732)
Place_Keyword: Meeker Quadrangle (s3509625)
Place_Keyword: Sparks Quadrangle (s3509626)
Place_Keyword: Arlington Quadrangle (s3509627)
Place_Keyword: Paden Quadrangle (s3509628)
Place_Keyword: Harrah Quadrangle (s3509739)
Place_Keyword: McLoud Quadrangle (s3509740)
Place_Keyword: Aydelotte Quadrangle (s3509633)
Place_Keyword: Shawnee NE Quadrangle (s3509634)
Place_Keyword: Prague Quadrangle (s3509635)
Place_Keyword: Prague NE Quadrangle (s3509636)
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.
This dataset is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, the users are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that the users make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.
Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which the maps were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
these maps do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position: State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address: Oklahoma State Office
Address: 100 USDA Suite 203
City: Stillwater
State_or_Province: Oklahoma
Postal_Code: 74074-2655
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 405-742-1247
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 202-720-2600
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jimmy.ford@ok.usda.gov
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1970
Title: Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Oklahoma
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: text, table, map
Other_Citation_Details:
This soil survey contains information that can be applied in
managing farms and wetlands; in selecting sites for roads, ponds,
buildings, and other structures; and in judging the suitability
of tracts of land for farming, industry, and recreation.
This soil survey depicts information about the kinds and
distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data
used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as
part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
Attribute accuracy is tested by manual comparison of the
source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized display of the
map data on an interactive computer graphic system.
Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or
on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In
addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid
attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in
the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Certain node/geometry and topology GT- polygon/chain relationships
are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements
(the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these
requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains
must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through
nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain
element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing
the limits of the file (neatline) are gap free. The tests of
logical consistency are performed by using vendor software. The
neatline is generated by connecting the explicitly entered four
corners of the digital file. All data outside the enclosed region
are ignored and all data crossing these geographically straight
lines are clipped at the neatline. Data in a specified tolerance
of the neatline are snapped to the neatline. Neatline straightening
aligns the digitized edges of the digital data with the generated
neatline (such as with the longitude/latitude lines in geographic
coordinates). All internal polygons are tested for closure with
vendor software and are checked on hard copy plots. All data are
checked for common soil lines (such as adjacent polygons with the
same label). Quadrangles are edge matched in the soil survey
area and edge locations generally do not deviate from centerline to
centerline by more than 0.01 inch. The feature edges, descriptive
attributes and feature labels have an acceptable join to the
Pottawatomie County, and Payne County, Oklahoma, soil surveys.
The feature edges, descriptive attributes and feature labels do
not join to those in Logan County, and Oklahoma County, Oklahoma,
soil surveys. The quadrangles in this soil survey do not join
with the quadrangles in the Okfuskee County, Oklahoma, soil survey.
Completeness_Report:
A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named the same in
terms of the soil and/or nonsoil areas. Each map unit differs
in some respect from all others in a survey area and is uniquely
identified. Each individual area is a delineation. Each map unit
consists of one or more components.
Soil scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous
(nonsoil) areas that have properties and behavior substantially
different than the named soils in the surrounding map unit. These
minor components may be indicated as special features. If these small
soils areas have a minimal effect on use and management, or could not be
precisely located, these areas may not be indicated on the map.
Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures
were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map
units, and location of special soil features. These standards are
outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993,
USDA, SCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, Soil Survey
Staff, 1975, USDA, Soil Conservation Service (SCS); and all Amendments;
Keys to Soil Taxonomy, Soil Survey Staff, (current issue); National
Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI, (current issue).
The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit
delineations were based on data collected by scientists during
the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National
Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on
peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality
control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the
soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds
of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes,
associations, and undifferentiated groups.
Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil. In
a consociation, delineated areas are dominated by a single soil
taxon and similar soils. At least one half of the pedons in each
delineation are of the same soil component so similar to the
named soil that major interpretations are not affected
substantially. The total amount of dissimilar inclusions of
other components in a map unit generally does not exceed about
15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting. A single
component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion generally does not
exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.
Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations are named
for two or more dissimilar components with the dominant component
listed first. Complexes and associations occur in a regularly repeating
pattern. The major components of a complex cannot be mapped separately at
a scale of about 1:24,000. The major components of an association can be
separated at a scale of about 1:24,000. In each delineation of
either a complex or an association, each major component is normally
present, though the proportions may vary from one delineation to another.
The total amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to
any of the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and
25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting inclusion
usually does not exceed 10 percent.
Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two
or more components that do not always occur together in the same
delineation, but are included in the same named map unit because
use and management are the same or similar for common uses. Every
delineation has at least one of the major components and some may
have components. The same principles regarding proportion of
inclusions apply to undifferentiated groups as to consociations.
Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the explanation,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.
A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 5 acres.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The accuracy of these digital data is based on the
compilation to base maps that meet National Map Accuracy
Standards. The difference in positional accuracy between the
soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the
field and the digitized map locations is unknown. The
locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies
with the transition between map units.
For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition
occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change
abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very
narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features
generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of the locations on
the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched
between datasets. The data along each quadrangle edge are
matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge
locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline
by more than 0.01 inch.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1970
Title: Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Oklahoma
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: atlas
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Washington, D.C.
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
information for map unit delineations, special
soil feature locations, and data on soil properties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title:
ratioed soil survey film positives of publication
annotation overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2001
Source_Currentness_Reference: 2001
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Contribution:
source of soil map unit delineations, soil
symbols, and special soil features
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1994
Title: multiple 7.5 minute orthophotos
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Ft. Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2001
Ending_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Source_Contribution: compilation base
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: annotated stable-base overlays
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2001
Ending_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: 2001
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS3
Source_Contribution: scan source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1995
Title: multiple 7.5 minute topographic digital raster graphs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Rolla, Missouri
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS2
Source_Contribution: source used to digitize county boundaries
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: DLG-3 directory for Lincoln County, Oklahoma
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2002
Source_Currentness_Reference: 2002
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution:
digital information for area and special soil
features for evaluation for SSURGO
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2003
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Lincoln County,
Oklahoma
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Ft. Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2003
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Source_Contribution: source used to apply boundary edits
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) database
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: unknown
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Lincoln County, Oklahoma, soil survey was
previously published in 1970 at 1:20,000 scale. The classification
and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1966.
An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 1997. In order to
provide accurate and up-to-date technical soil services, the
correlation of Lincoln County Soil Survey was amended. The
manuscript descriptions of the 1970 publication were examined to
determine if the descriptions were within the current series concept. If the
map unit description was not within the named series concept, a
different soil series was identified. Two additional
map units were added to the soil survey. The changes were made to
reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and
soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document
reflecting these changes are on file at the NRCS Oklahoma State
Office. The additional map units are as follows:
DAM-------Large Dam
M-W-------Miscellaneous Water
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Process_Date: 2002
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Ratioed soil survey film positives were developed.
Soil map unit delineations and special soil features were manually
recompiled from the soil survey film positives (scale: 24,000) to 4
mil. annotated stable-base overlays that were registered to multiple
7.5-minute orthophotos.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1, NRCS2, USGS1, NRCS3
Process_Date: 2001
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
During the map compilation quality review an
evaluation was made of the map unit joins for surrounding soil
surveys by a soil-data-quality specialist.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1, NRCS2, NRCS3, USGS1
Process_Date: 2001
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The annotated overlays were raster scanned on
a Anatek-Eagle 4050 scanner at a resolution of 300 dots per inch
at Midwest Graphics in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Four control points
corresponding to the four corners of the 7.5-minute quadrangles
were used during data collection by cartographic technicians
at the NRCS Montana Digitizing Unit in Bozeman, Montana. The
data were created in North American Datum of 1983. The processing
of area features included raster editing, map neatline development,
labeling, edge matching, and vector conversion and editing in
ARC/INFO, Version 8.0. County boundaries were digitized from the
topographic Digital Raster Graphs (DRG). The processing of special
features included labeling and edge matching in ARC/INFO, Version 8.0.
Plots were generated of area and special features and forwarded
to soil scientists on staff at the Natural Resources Conservation
Service state office in Stillwater, Oklahoma. The soil scientists'
edits were applied in ARC/INFO, Version 8.0. New plots were
generated of 10 percent of the survey area and forwarded to the
Major Land Resource Area in Temple, Texas, for a digitizing review.
Digital Line Graph, Optional (DLG-3) files were written for
area and special features with mk_dlg.aml routine in ARC/INFO 8.0.
The data were forwarded to certification staff at the Montana
Digitizing Unit for evaluation and certification.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2, NRCS3, USGS1, USGS2
Process_Date: 2002
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The DLG-3 directory was imported to ARC/INFO,Version 7.21
and evaluated with revised October 1998 SSURGO evaluation routines
provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial
Center in Fort Worth, Texas. ARCEDIT was used to correct
node and label mismatches. Minor1 codes were renamed to link the
spatial data to the National Soil Information System database.
New DLG-3 files were written. The data were forwarded to the
National Cartography and Geospatial Center in Ft. Worth, Texas, for
archiving and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Process_Date: 2003
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The National Soil Information System database
was developed by Natural Resources Conservation Service soil
scientists according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Process_Date: 2002
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The online SSURGO DLG-3 files were imported
into ARC/INFO 8.0 by certification staff at the Montana Digitizing
Unit. ARCEDIT was used to edit boundary line segments on the
Prague NE and the Harrah quadrangles. New DLG-3 files for these
two quadrangles were written. The data were forwarded to the
National Cartography and Geospatial Center in Ft. Worth, Texas,
for online distribution and archiving.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Process_Date: 2003
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, on completion of data-quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey explanation was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
datasets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040212
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, on completion of data-quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey explanation was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040507
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
datasets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20040507
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, on completion of data-quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey explanation was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051216
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
datasets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051216
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, on completion of data-quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey explanation was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060710
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
datasets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060711
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, on completion of data-quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey explanation was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061226
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
datasets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061227
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, on completion of data-quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey explanation was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20070718
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, State Soil Scientist or
delegate, verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
datasets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20070724
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The tabular data were extracted from the data mart without change. The spatial data was exported to an ESRI shapefile.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20071217
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Geographic:
Geographic_Coordinate_Units: Decimal degrees
Latitude_Resolution: 0.0000001
Longitude_Resolution: 0.0000001
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Special Soil Features
Entity_Type_Definition:
Special Soil Features represent soil, nonsoil, or landform
features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations
(area features).
Entity_Type_Definition_Source:
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual.
Soil Survey Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Special Soil Features Codes
Attribute_Definition:
Special Soil Features Codes represent specific Special Soil
Features. These features are identified with a major code,
a minor code, and a descriptive label. The codes and label
are assigned to the point or line assigned to represent the
feature on published maps.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual.
Soil Survey Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18; U.S. Department
of Agriculture. (current issue). National Soil Survey
Handbook, title 430-VI, part 647. Soil Conservation Service
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name:
Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Lincoln County,
Oklahoma
Codeset_Source:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated
by a single soil or nonsoil component plus allowable similar or
dissimilar soils, or these delineations can be geographic mixtures
of groups of soils or soils and nonsoil areas.
The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed delineation
map unit. Each symbol is linked to a map unit name. The map unit
symbol also is the key for linking information in the National Soil
Information System tables. The map unit symbols are not carried
in the modified Digital Line Graph file; however, the symbols are made
available in a companion attribute file. The attribute file links
the minor codes in the Digital Line Graph files to the map unit
symbols.
Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil
Information System database. This attribute database gives the
proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for
each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data
on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil
interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation,
agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil.
The National Soil Information System database contains static
metadata. The database documents the data structure and includes such
information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relations
are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these
database objects. Attributes include table and column
descriptions and detailed domain information.
The National Soil Information System database also contains a
distribution metadata. The database records the criteria used for selecting
map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed
data.
Special features are described in the feature table. The features
table includes a feature label, feature name, and feature description
for each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Soil Taxonomy: A basic system
of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (current issue). Keys to Soil
Taxonomy. Soil Survey Staff, Soil Conservation Service
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (current issue). National Soil
Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources
Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual.
Soil Survey Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, National
Cartography and Geospatial Center
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: P.O. Box 6567
City: Fort Worth
State_or_Province: Texas
Postal_Code: 76115
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-672-5559
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 817-509-3469
Resource_Description: Lincoln County, Oklahoma, SSURGO
Distribution_Liability:
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer
system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed
or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data
on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute
any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant
the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will
offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined
unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or
when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request
for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date
of this shipment from the ordering site.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any affiliated agencies are
liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of
viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of
these datasets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in all programs and activities on the basis of race,
color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ArcView shapefile
Format_Information_Content: spatial
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 46.1
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions:
Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval by
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ARC/INFO coverage
Format_Information_Content: spatial
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 46.1
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions:
Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval by
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ARC/INFO interchange file
Format_Information_Content: spatial
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 46.1
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions:
Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval by
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
Format_Information_Content: keys and attributes
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 14.3
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: URL:http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions:
Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email
address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval by
anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request
at Web site and receipt of email message.
Fees:
Currently no direct charge is required for requesting data or for
retrieval by FTP.
Ordering_Instructions:
Visit the above mentioned Internet Web Site, select state or
territory, then select individual soil survey area of interest.
Spatial line data and locations of special feature symbols are in
ESRI ArcGIS (ArcView,ArcInfo) shapefile, coverage and interchange
(such as export) formats. The National Soil Information System
attribute soil data are available in variable length, pipe
delimited, and ASCII file format.
Turnaround: Typically within four hours
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20071217
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position: State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address: Oklahoma State Office
Address: 100 USDA Suite 203
City: Stillwater
State_or_Province: Oklahoma
Postal_Code: 74074-2655
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 405-742-1247
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 202-720-2600
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: jimmy.ford@ok.usda.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name: Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998