Gamble, B.M., Bailey, E.A., Schmidt, J.M., Shew, N.B., Labay, K.A., Granitto, Matthew, O’Leary, R.M., and Detra, D.E., 2010, Stream-sediment samples reanalyzed for major, rare earth, and trace elements from seven 1:250,000-scale quadrangles, south-central Alaska, 2007–09: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 532, 4 p.Online Links:
This is a point data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.001 degrees. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.001 degrees. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees.
The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927 (NAD27).
The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.4.
The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.98.
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 1,075 |
Alphanumeric data without scientific significance. Each value is assigned by the USGS/LIMS at the time of submittal and is unique.
Alphanumeric data without scientific significance. Each value assigned by the submitter is unique.
Alphanumeric data without scientific significance. Each value assigned by the USGS prior to submitting to a laboratory is unique to the group of samples submitted together. These values were assigned when the samples were originally submitted for preparation and analyses. The scheme used for Job No. has varied with time; some values are numeric and some values are combinations of letters and numbers.
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 59.415 |
Maximum: | 62.998 |
Units: | decimal degrees |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | -155.979 |
Maximum: | -150.011 |
Units: | decimal degrees |
Text field.
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.6 | below the lower limit of detection (0.6 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.6 |
Maximum: | 2,520 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<1 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppb) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 5,990 |
Units: | ppb (parts per billion) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<1 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppb) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 15 |
Units: | ppb (parts per billion) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.5 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppb) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.5 |
Maximum: | 28.3 |
Units: | ppb (parts per billion) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.01 |
Maximum: | 12.1 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.01 | below the lower limit of detection (0.01%) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.01 |
Maximum: | 29.6 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.01 | below the lower limit of detection (0.01%) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.01 |
Maximum: | 17.9 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.01 | below the lower limit of detection (0.01%) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.01 |
Maximum: | 5.47 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.01 | below the lower limit of detection (0.01%) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.01 |
Maximum: | 5.47 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.01 | below the lower limit of detection (0.01%) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.01 |
Maximum: | 0.66 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.01 | below the lower limit of detection (0.01%) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.01 |
Maximum: | 0.48 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.03 |
Maximum: | 2.19 |
Units: | % (percent) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<1 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 15 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<30 | below the lower limit of detection (30 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 30 |
Maximum: | 2,510 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 2 |
Maximum: | 9,250 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<5 | below the lower limit of detection (5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 5 |
Maximum: | 9,250 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.1 | below the lower limit of detection (0.1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.1 |
Maximum: | 9,250 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.2 | below the lower limit of detection (0.2 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.2 |
Maximum: | 9,250 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 8.4 |
Maximum: | 1,530 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.5 | below the lower limit of detection (0.5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.5 |
Maximum: | 72.5 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<10 | below the lower limit of detection (10 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 10 |
Maximum: | 1,120 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.1 | below the lower limit of detection (0.1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.1 |
Maximum: | 39.7 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<5 | below the lower limit of detection (5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 5 |
Maximum: | 3,050 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1.22 |
Maximum: | 75.8 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.67 |
Maximum: | 50.2 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.19 |
Maximum: | 6.10 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 3 |
Maximum: | 31 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1.00 |
Maximum: | 61.7 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<1 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 60 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.2 | below the lower limit of detection (0.2 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 136 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.23 |
Maximum: | 16.6 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.2 | below the lower limit of detection (0.2 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.2 |
Maximum: | 1.2 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 4.1 |
Maximum: | 762 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<10 | below the lower limit of detection (10 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 10 |
Maximum: | 180 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.06 |
Maximum: | 6.94 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<2 | below the lower limit of detection (2 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 2 |
Maximum: | 37 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<1 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 101 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 5.4 |
Maximum: | 650 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<5 | below the lower limit of detection (5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 5 |
Maximum: | 1,180 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<5 | below the lower limit of detection (5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 5 |
Maximum: | 683 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1.17 |
Maximum: | 179 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1.9 |
Maximum: | 296 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.1 | below the lower limit of detection (0.1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.1 |
Maximum: | 97 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<5 | below the lower limit of detection (5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 5 |
Maximum: | 32 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1.0 |
Maximum: | 92.4 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<1 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 101 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.4 |
Maximum: | 1,860 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.5 | below the lower limit of detection (0.5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.5 |
Maximum: | 7.2 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.19 |
Maximum: | 11.6 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.4 |
Maximum: | 260 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<0.5 | below the lower limit of detection (0.5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.5 |
Maximum: | 2.3 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.08 |
Maximum: | 7.59 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.20 |
Maximum: | 286 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<5 | below the lower limit of detection (5 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 5 |
Maximum: | 627 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
<1 | below the lower limit of detection (1 ppm) |
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 1 |
Maximum: | 162 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 6.9 |
Maximum: | 453 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 0.6 |
Maximum: | 47.7 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 11 |
Maximum: | 2,330 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Value | Definition |
---|---|
ins | insufficient sample material for analysis |
Range of values | |
---|---|
Minimum: | 27 |
Maximum: | 4,750 |
Units: | ppm (parts per million) |
Matthew Granitto: USGS, Denver, CO, USGS National Geochemical Database (NGDB) organization and maintenance; Steven M. Smith: USGS, Denver, CO, USGS NGDB project leader; David E. Detra: USGS Denver, CO, Analytical chemistry methods information, analytical data quality assurance and control, contract chemistry manager; Richard M. O'Leary: USGS Denver, CO, Analytical chemistry methods information, analytical data quality assurance and control, sample preparation oversight; Peter Hauessler: technical reviewer; Tim Brabets: technical reviewer; Theresa Taylor: metadata reviewer
1-907-786-7479 (voice)
1-907-786-7401 (FAX)
bgamble@usgs.gov
In preparation for future mineral resource assessments some of those original samples (about 6 percent) were selected for reanalysis because recently developed analytical methods can detect additional elements of interest and have lower detection limits than the methods used when these samples were originally analyzed. These samples were reanalyzed to determine if the original analyses are adequate for a regional-scale mineral resource assessment, to determine if the original data are adequate to establish regional-scale baselines for elements of interest, and to incorporate additional analyses of elements, such as platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), and rare earth elements (REE).
Bailey, E.A., Shew, N.B., Labay, K.A., Schmidt, J.M., O’Leary, R.M., and Detra, D.E., 2010, Stream-sediment samples reanalyzed for major, rare earth, and trace elements from ten 1:250,000-scale quadrangles, south-central Alaska, 2007–08: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1147, 6 p.Online Links:
The analytical methods used to generate the data in this report were selected by the authors. The accuracy of the data varies with the analytical methodology and with the concentration of the element being analyzed. Please see USGS Open-File Report 02-0223 (<https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ofr-02-0223/>) and the USGS Mineral Resources Program Contract Laboratory Method Summaries web site (<http://minerals.cr.usgs.gov/projects/analytical_chem/references.html>) for specific details on the sample preparation and analytical methods used for this report.
Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitude and longitude values are specified in decimal degrees. The original sample location data were recorded in a variety of formats (decimal degrees, degrees plus decimal minutes, degrees-minutes-seconds). Most of the coordinates were originally determined in the field using clear mylar graticules overlaid on a paper 1:63,360-scale topographic base maps in degrees, minutes, and seconds or in the office using a tablet digitizer. When submitters reported locations as degrees, minutes, and seconds of latitude and longitude the accuracy should be within a few seconds or about 200 feet.
The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927.
The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
Samples to be reanalyzed were randomly selected from 10 x 10 km (6.2 x 6.2 mi) grid cells that we overlaid on the study area to ensure a relatively even sample distribution. When available, two samples were selected from each cell. Archived material sufficient for re-analysis was not available for all samples initially selected. When possible, new selections were made in an attempt to continue to have two samples from each cell.
The selected samples were reanalyzed to determine if the original analyses are adequate for regional-scale mineral resource assessment, if the original data are adequate to determine regional-scale baselines for elements of interest, and to incorporate additional analyses such as platinum and palladium and rare earth elements (REE). Original analyses, many of which are by semiquantitative methods, may be found in the Rock Analysis and Storage System (RASS) component of the National Geochemical Database (NGDB), but are not included in this dataset.
The geographic extent of this area includes the Iliamna, Lake Clark, Lime Hills, McGrath, Seldovia, Talkeetna, and Tyonek 1:250,000-scale quadrangles in Alaska. All of the 1,075 samples retrieved from the Building 810 archive at the Denver Federal Center for this report were reanalyzed for As by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (HGAAS), and for a suite of 55 major, rare earth, and trace elements by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-AES-MS). Most of these samples were also reanalyzed for Au, Pd, and Pt by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry after fire assay separation (FA/ICP_MS) however several samples did not contain enough material (30 g.) to be analyzed. These samples are noted in the data table with "ins" in the fields (columns) for Au, Pd, and Pt.
All sample analyses were completed in 2007-2009 at a laboratory under contract to the USGS. Contract laboratory oversight, data entry into the USGS National Geochemical Database, and analytical data QA/QC are managed by David E. Detra, David L. Fey, and Richard M. O'Leary at the USGS in Denver, CO.
This report consists of 4 files.
The first PDF file (ds532.pdf) contains introductory and explanatory text and a table with the upper and lower reporting limits for each element analyzed by the various analytical methods used for this data set.
The second file is a PDF (ds532_plate01.pdf) image showing the location of the 1,075 stream-sediment samples reanalyzed for this report.
The other two files contain the sample identification, location, and analytical data for each sample reported. This data is available in five formats: spreadsheet (ds532_appendix_a.xls, ds532_appendix_a.xlsx, ds532_appendix_a.ods), database (ds532_appendix_a.dbf), and ASCII (ds532_appendix_a.csv). The location coordinate and analytical data fields were formatted as numeric fields in MS Excel to preserve the formatting when converted to the database format.
Abreviations used in the data tables (ds532_appendix_a.xls, ds532_appendix_a.csv, ds532_appendix_a.dbf, ds532_appendix_a.xlsx, ds532_appendix_a.ods):
HGAAS: hydride genration atomic absorption spectrometry
FA/ICP_MS: fire assay with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry finish
ICPAES_MS: inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry or inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
ppm: parts per million
ppb: parts per billion
%: percent
<: less than the indicated lower limit of detection for the element as determined by the analytical method used
ins: insufficient sample for analysis
All of the location coordinate and analytical data fields have been formatted as numeric fields. Maximum and minimum values were calculated to insure that valid results were reported for each analytical value; that is all values are greater than zero (0) and not less than the element lower reporting limit for each analytical method. Latitude/Longitude coordinates were checked to insure they plotted in the correct 1:250,000-scale quadrangle.
Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
- Access_Constraints: None
- Use_Constraints: None
1-888-ASK-USGS (1-888-275-8747) (voice) (voice)
1-303-202-4695 (FAX) (FAX)
infoservices@usgs.gov
USGS Data Series 532
The USGS makes no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of information contained in the geographic data. The USGS further makes no warranties, either expressed or implied as to any other matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the product, or its fitness for any particular purpose. The burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. Although this data has been processed successfully on computers at the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS regarding the use of this data on any other system, nor does the fact of distribution constitute or imply any such warranty. In no event shall the USGS have any liability whatsoever for payment of any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or tort damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, any loss of profits arising out of use of or reliance on the geographic data or arising out of the delivery, installation, operation, or support by the USGS
Data format: | tabular data with sample identification, location information, and chemical analyses of stream-sediment samples in format XLS, XLSX, ODS, DBF, and CSV (version MS Excel 2003; MS Excel 2007; OpenDocument Spreadsheet (OpenOffice.org Calc); dBase IV; ASCII comma separated values) |
---|---|
Network links: |
<https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/532/data/ds532_metadata.zip> |
Data format: | report text and sample location plate in format PDF |
---|---|
Network links: |
<https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/532/data/ds532_metadata.zip> |
Digital downloads: less than 30 minutes for most files
CSV (comma separated value) files can be imported and formatted with Microsoft Excel, OpenOffice.org Calc, or other spreadsheet and text editor programs; can also be imported into ArcGIS or other geographical information system (GIS) programs
1-907-786-7442 (voice)
1-907-786-7401 (FAX)
eabailey@usgs.gov