USGS Fact Sheet 2004-3080
August 2004
 |
 |
| Wyoming Department of Agriculture | Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division |
In cooperation with the Wyoming Department of Agriculture (WDA) and the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ)
WYOMING'S PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN
GROUND-WATER MONITORING IN TETON COUNTY
DATA DISTRIBUTION AND AVAILABILITY
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Figure 1. Pathways of pesticide movement in the hydrologic cycle (modified...
Figure 2. Vulnerability of Teton County ground water to pesticide contamin...
Figure 3. Location of wells sampled in Teton County, Wyoming, and notation...
Table 1. Baseline monitoring for pesticides in Teton County, late summer/fa...
In 1991, members of local, State, and Federal governments, as well as industry and interest groups, formed the Ground-water and Pesticide Strategy Committee to prepare the State of Wyoming's generic Management Plan for Pesticides in Ground Water. Part of this management plan is to sample and analyze Wyoming's ground water for pesticides. In 1995, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Ground-water and Pesticide Strategy Committee, began statewide implementation of the sampling component of the State of Wyoming's generic Management Plan for Pesticides in Ground Water. During 2001-02, baseline monitoring was conducted in Teton County.
Synthetic organic pesticides are used to control weeds, insects, and other organisms in a wide variety of agricultural and nonagricultural settings. The use of pesticides has helped to make the United States the world's largest producer of food (Barbash and Resek, 1996). Pesticide use, however, has also been accompanied by concerns about potential adverse effects on the environment and human health. A potential pathway for the transport of pesticides is through hydrologic systems, which supply water for both humans and natural ecosystems. Water is one of the primary ways pesticides are transported from an application area to other locations in the environment (fig. 1) (Barbash and Resek, 1996).
Pesticide contamination of ground water is a national issue because of the widespread use of pesticides, the expense and difficulty of remediating ground water, and the fact that ground water is used for drinking water by about 50 percent of the Nation's population. Although application rates and the variety of pesticides used may be greater in urban areas, concern over their presence in ground water is especially acute in rural agricultural areas where more than 95 percent of the population rely upon this resource for drinking water (Solley and others, 1998).
The Ground-water and Pesticide Strategy Committee (GPSC) has developed the generic State Management Plan for Pesticides in Ground Water for the State of Wyoming (SMP) (Wyoming Ground-water and Pesticides Strategy Committee, 1999). Wyoming was required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to have developed an SMP in order for individuals and organizations to continue using certain pesticides in the state. The SMP includes information relating to individuals and organizations involved with implementation of the SMP, methods of preventing ground-water contamination, ground-water monitoring, and the responses required if pesticides are detected in ground water.
One critical part of the SMP is ground-water monitoring. This ground-water monitoring program has two phases. The first phase, baseline monitoring, is designed to determine what pesticides, if any, have leached into the county's ground water. The second phase, problem identification monitoring, is used to gather additional information about the ground water near wells having significant pesticide detections.
Baseline monitoring is prioritized by a county rank and the vulnerability of the county's ground water to pesticides. During development of the SMP, the GPSC evaluated each county in Wyoming to determine the potential vulnerability of the county's ground water to pesticides. Each county was ranked according to the extent of cropland and urban areas in the county, and the amount of pesticides sold within the county in 1991 (Wyoming Ground-water and Pesticides Strategy Committee, 1999).
A ground-water vulnerability map was prepared for the uppermost or shallowest aquifer (Hammerlink and Arneson, 1998). A Geographic Information System was used to overlay seven layers describing hydrogeology and land use. Ground water is more vulnerable because of either inherent sensitivity of the hydrogeology, or because of the combination of the sensitivity and associated land use. The map was used to assist in the selection of monitoring sites in each county. Monitoring focuses on areas where the ground water is most vulnerable.
The GPSC selected 18 pesticides (focal pesticides) and 2 degradation products to be sampled as part of the SMP (table 1). The analytical method used to detect the focal pesticides can also detect 66 other pesticides and degradation products. Any additional pesticides detected are listed in table 1 as non-focal pesticides. Ground water from all wells in the baseline monitoring program was analyzed for the pesticides listed in table 1, with the exception of difenzoquat and metsulfuron, for which analytical methods were not available.
The goal of the ground-water sampling part of the SMP is to collect ground-water samples for pesticide analyses in all 23 Wyoming counties. To date, sampling has been completed in Goshen (1995-96), Park (1997), Washakie (1997-98), Fremont (1998-99), Lincoln (1998-99), Laramie (1998-99), Big Horn (1999-2000), Sheridan (1999-2000), Platte (2000-01), Johnson (2000-01), Crook (2000-01), Natrona (2001-02), Sweetwater (2001-02), Teton (2001-02), and Uinta (2002-03) Counties. Sampling began in 2003 in Albany, Converse, and Hot Springs Counties.
Table 1. Baseline monitoring for pesticides in Teton County, late summer/fall 2001 and spring 2002.
[µg/L, micrograms per liter; C, estimated values used in calculation]
| Pesticide | Pesticide trade name | Pesticide action1 | Number of detections/ number of samples2 | Maximum concentration (µg/L) | Average concentration of detections (µg/L) | Safe drinking water standard (µg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-focal pesticides detected in Teton County ground water | ||||||
| Prometon | Pramitol | Non-selective herbicide | 5/24 | 0.1 | 0.04C | 3100 |
| Focal pesticides not detected in Teton County ground water | ||||||
| 2,4-D | Aldicarb Sulfone4 | Bromacil | DCPA | Metalachlor | Simazine | |
| Alachlor | Aldicarb Sulfoxide4 | Clopyralid | Dicamba | Metribuzin | Tebuthiuron | |
| Aldicarb | Atrazine | Cyanazine | Hexazinone | Picloram | Telone | |
| Focal pesticides not analyzed in Teton County ground water (no method of analysis available) | ||||||
| Difenzoquat Metsulfuron | ||||||
1 Meister (1996)
2 Each of the 12 sites was sampled twice. One site located in Jackson had no water in the well during the spring sampling, and an adjacent well was used for that site.
3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Lifetime Health Advisory Level (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002).
4 Degradation product of aldicarb.
Ground water in Teton County was ranked fifteenth most vulnerable to pesticide contamination in Wyoming (Wyoming Ground-water and Pesticide Strategy Committee, 1999). The vulnerability map created by the Spatial Data and Visualization Center (Hammerlink and Arneson, 1998) identifies ground water found in unconsolidated Quaternary deposits (primarily alluvial and terrace deposits) and the mountainous areas throughout the county most vulnerable to pesticides (shown as red or yellow on fig. 2). The mountainous areas were not sampled, because although the hydrogeology makes the ground water susceptible to contamination, land use does not create a large potential for contamination and because sampling locations were not available in these areas.
Twelve sites were selected in Teton County (fig. 3) for baseline monitoring. All sites were located in Snake River or Buffalo Fork alluvium. All sites were sampled in late summer or fall 2001 and spring 2002.
None of the 18 focal pesticides was detected in Teton County (table 1). One non-focal pesticide was detected in 3 of 12 sites sampled in Teton County; the concentrations were less than 1/1000 of the applicable drinking-water standard (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002) (table 1).
The only detected pesticide in Teton County was prometon (detected in 5 out of 24 samples). Prometon is the active ingredient in Pramitol, a general-use pesticide, and its detection is typically associated with urban land use (Barbash and others, 1999). Prometon was also the most commonly detected pesticide in Sheridan, Crook, Johnson, and Natrona Counties.
The sampling results have been provided to local groups interested in pesticides in ground water in Teton County. The information can be used by citizens and local governments to help understand current conditions. Analytical results of the Teton County sampling can be found in Swanson and others (2002) and Swanson and others (2003), or on the internet at http://waterdata.usgs.gov/wy/nwis/qwdata. Analytical results and fact sheets for all counties sampled to date are available from the U.S. Geological Survey in Cheyenne by phone, email, and on the internet at http://wy.water.usgs.gov/projects/pesticide/.
Barbash, J.E., and Resek, E.A., 1996, Pesticides in ground water: Distribution, trends, and governing factors, in Gilliom, R.J., ed., Pesticides in the hydrologic system (v. 2): Lewis Publishing, 590 p.
Barbash, J.E., Thelin, G.P., Kolpin, D.W., and Gilliom, R.J., 1999, Distribution of major herbicides in ground water of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4245, 64 p.
Hammerlink, J.D., and Arneson, C.S., editors, 1998, Wyoming ground water vulnerability assessment handbook: Volume 2. Assessing ground water vulnerability to pesticides: University of Wyoming, Laramie, Spatial Data and Visualization Center Publication SDVC 98-01-2, variable pagination.
Meister, R.T., 1996, Farm Chemicals Handbook: Willoughby, Ohio, Meister Publishing Co., variable pagination.
Solley, W.B., Pierce, R.R., and Perlman, H.A., 1998, Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1200, 71 p.
Swanson, R.B., Blajszczak, E.J., Roberts, S.C., Watson, K.R., and Mason, J.P., 2002, Water-resources data, Wyoming, water year 2001, Volume 2. Ground Water: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report WY-01-2, 127 p.
Swanson, R.B., Blajszczak, E.J., Roberts, S.C., Watson, K.R., and Mason, J.P., 2003, Water-resources data, Wyoming, water year 2002, Volume 2. Ground Water: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report WY-02-2, 140 p.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002, Drinking water regulations and health advisories: EPA 822-R-02-038.
Wyoming Ground-water and Pesticides Strategy Committee, 1999, Wyoming generic state management plan for pesticides and ground water: prepared for Wyoming Department of Agriculture, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 103 p.
This document was prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Wyoming Department of Agriculture (WDA), and the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division (WDEQ). All agencies are members of the Ground-water and Pesticide Strategy Committee.
This project has been funded in part with a Section 319 grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality's Non-Point Source Program.
The use of trade, product, industry, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Wyoming Department of Agriculture
2219 Carey Avenue
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002
(307) 777-7324
Kevin Frederick
Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division
4th Floor, Herschler Building
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002
(307) 777-7781
Cheryl Eddy Miller
U.S. Geological Survey, WRD
2617 E. Lincolnway, Suite B
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001
(307) 778-2931
Email: cemiller@usgs.gov
Document Accessibility: Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visually impaired. This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools convert Adobe PDF documents into HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text as audible speech. In addition, an accessible version of Acrobat Reader 6.0, which contains support for screen readers, is available. These tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at Adobe Access.
| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices | |
  |
|