In 2001, the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program began an intensive study to assess the vulnerability of public-supply wells to contamination from a variety of compounds.
The study builds on previous NAWQA studies from 1991 to 2001 that found low levels of mixtures of contaminants in ground water near the water table in urban areas across the Nation (in about 90 percent of monitoring wells) and, less frequently, in deeper ground water typically developed for public supply (Hamilton and others, 2004). Data from more than 1,000 public-supply wells within major water-supply aquifers are being evaluated in this study, and data from more aquifers and wells are scheduled to be added in 2009 (see map, p. 4).
This NAWQA study is focusing on the transport and chemical breakdown of selected anthropogenic contaminants from urban and agricultural sources, as well as contaminants from natural sources, within that part of the ground-water system contributing water to public-supply wells. Scientists are investigating how the linkage between contaminant sources and public-supply wells is affected by processes that occur below land surface—whereby contaminants are mobilized, dispersed, diluted, volatilized, adsorbed, and (or) degraded. Scientists are also investigating how the operation of public-supply wells can affect their vulnerability to contamination.
Because subsurface processes and management practices differ among aquifers and public-water systems, public-supply wells in different parts of the Nation are not equally vulnerable to contamination, even where similar contaminant sources exist. The study is identifying these important differences, as well as similarities, in a complementary set of aquifer systems, urban settings, and public-water systems.
About one-third of the U.S. population gets drinking water from public-supply wells. The occurrence of contaminants in these wells is highly variable (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999). To safeguard public health, we need a better understanding of how these wells can become contaminated.
Understanding public-supply well contamination is also an economic issue because cleaning up contaminated ground water is expensive and difficult. Drinking water from public-supply wells must meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and (or) State water-quality standards. Vulnerability assessments based on sound science will help decision-makers predict which wells are vulnerable to contamination and design strategies to prevent future contamination, thereby sustaining the water supply.
Vulnerability assessments, however, are inherently uncertain. Scientists do not fully understand contaminant behavior in the subsurface, and there are limitations in the databases and models used to perform the assessments (National Research Council, 1993). An additional challenge is the need to strike a balance between complex, costly assessments and those that are oversimplified (Focazio and others, 2002). As a result, ground-water vulnerability has been assessed using many different methods (Nolan, 1998); most of the previous assessments have focused on the transport of contaminants to the water table rather than to public-supply wells.
Contaminants assessed in this study
In the current study, we address the challenges of vulnerability assessments by collecting and analyzing similar data within a variety of settings, including unique data collected using new tools. We are developing a library of site-specific models to help sort out the most important factors to include in vulnerability assessments in different settings at both regional and local scales.
|An aquifer system and public-water system in an urban setting. The water entering the well screens of the public-supply wells is of different ages and from different areas because of their long screened intervals, which commonly make public-supply wells vulnerable to contamination from multiple sources. In this example, sources of contaminants may include those associated with urban and agricultural land-use activities. Aquifer materials may also serve as sources of natural contaminants such as arsenic.|
Study results will provide a foundation for assessing the vulnerability of the Nation’s public-supply wells to a variety of contaminants, and will help those involved in well siting and water-quality protection anticipate the response of different systems to changes in management practices. The results also will be useful to those involved in planning and implementing State source-water assessment and protection programs, as guided by the USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997).
Ground-water vulnerability—the likelihood that contaminants will reach a specified reference location in a ground-water system (the water table, deep within the aquifer, a public- supply well, the interface between ground and surface water) (National Research Council, 1993).
Area contributing recharge—the surface area at the water table or a surface-water body from which water entering the ground-water system eventually flows to the well. Estimates of areas contributing recharge to public-supply wells are made in order to target ground-water protection practices (Franke and others, 1998).
Ground-water age—the time elapsed (ranging from days to millennia) since water reached the water table during recharge. Young ground water tends to be more susceptible to contamination from current sources at the land surface than older ground water (Focazio and others, 2002). Water discharging from a well is usually a mixture of waters of different ages.
Ground-water sustainability—the development and use of ground-water resources in a manner that can be maintained indefinitely without unacceptable consequences (Alley and Leake, 2004). Water quality and water quantity are equally critical for the long-term sustainability of the Nation’s water supply (U.S. Geological Survey, 2002).
Sampling at different depths
The screened or open intervals of public-supply wells are commonly from tens to hundreds of feet in length; therefore, water from these wells is generally a mixture of waters of different ages that enter the well at different depths and are associated with different potential sources of contamination. The graphic on this page illustrates a situation where recharge to public-supply wells reflects urban and agricultural land-use activities. Specifically, water recharges the aquifer in the urban area containing urban-related contaminants, such as volatile organic compounds, and enters the well screens above water that has traveled from the more distant agricultural area where recharge water may contain contaminants such as agricultural pesticides.
Using a USGS-developed sampler (Izbicki, 2004), we are collecting samples at multiple depths in pumping public-supply wells to ascertain where and how contaminants from different sources enter the wells. For example, samples collected from public-supply wellheads and analyzed for concentrations of multiple contaminants are being “dated” to determine ground-water age and compared to samples and ages of water entering the wells at various depths (see graph below). This analysis is helping to evaluate the usefulness of ground-water age samples from wellheads for predicting the risk of contamination.
Evaluating multiple settings and scales
Consistent methods are being used to collect and analyze data, and investigations are being conducted at both regional (tens to thousands of square miles) and local scales (less than 10 square miles). We can therefore compare and contrast results and identify the most important processes to include in vulnerability assessments applied at different scales and in a variety of water-supply aquifers. For example, nitrate is detected in ground water in most participating study areas. The distribution and concentration of nitrate between the water table and public-supply wells are controlled predominantly by dilution in some areas and by dispersion or degradation in others. Using models developed for each study area, we are exploring how these differences in subsurface processes affect the response of different aquifer systems to common management practices.
Exploring the consequences of uncertainty
To make informed decisions about activities at a particular location, decision- makers need to know whether the location is contributing recharge to public-supply wells. They also need information about traveltimes between potential contaminant sources and public-supply wells. Because this information cannot be measured directly, decision-makers must rely on estimates that are inherently uncertain (due to limitations in the methods). We are exploring the consequences of this uncertainty, and helping decision-makers understand these consequences, by comparing estimates from traditional and probabilistic modeling approaches with actual water-quality data from public-supply wells.
|Inflow at different depths within a public-supply well. The aerial photo shows an approximately 63-square-mile area near the well. Water entering the well screen is associated with different potential sources of contaminants because of the different land-use activities in the areas contributing recharge to various intervals along the well screen, as well as the different aquifer materials through which water flows between the recharge areas and the well. The amount of contamination that might be contributed by any given interval is related to the volume of water that flows into the well along the interval and the concentration of any associated contaminants. Depth-dependent samples are a composite of all intervals beneath the sampling point; these samples are being analyzed for chemical quality and ground-water age and then compared to samples collected from the wellhead.|
Study results, models, and other decision- support tools will apply to broad classes of contaminants, including newly identified, emerging contaminants, and will help water managers and scientists:
|Locations of regional-scale studies of public-supply well vulnerability to contamination from urban, agricultural, and natural sources. Studies began in 2001 in eight States, in Texas and New Mexico in 2005, and are scheduled for Illinois and New Jersey or New York in 2009.|
Sandra Eberts, Team Leader
(614) 430-7740, email@example.com
Mary Ann Thomas, Ohio
(614) 430-7736 firstname.lastname@example.org
Craig Brown, Connecticut
(860) 291-6766 email@example.com
Karen Burow, California
(916) 278-3087 firstname.lastname@example.org
Michael Rosen, Nevada
(775) 887-7683 email@example.com
Bernard Stolp, Utah
(801) 908-5061 firstname.lastname@example.org
Suzanne Paschke, Colorado
(303) 236-4882 ext 352 email@example.com
Matthew Landon, Nebraska
(402) 328-4125 firstname.lastname@example.org
Laura Bexfield, New Mexico
(505) 830-7972 email@example.com
Lynne Fahlquist, Texas
(512) 927-3508 firstname.lastname@example.org
Christy Crandall, Florida
(850) 942-9500 ext 3030 email@example.com
Alley, W.M., and Leake, S.A., 2004, The journey from safe yield to sustainability: Ground Water, v. 42, no. 1, p. 12-16.
Focazio, M.J., Reilly, T.E., Rupert, M.G., and Helsel, D.R., 2002, Assessing ground-water vulnerability to contamination–Providing scientifically defensible information for decision makers: USGS Circular 1224, 33 p.
Franke, O.L., Reilly, T.E., Pollock, D.W., and LaBaugh, J.W., 1998, Estimating areas contributing recharge to wells–Lessons from previous studies: USGS Circular 1174, 14 p.
Hamilton, P.A., Miller, T.L., and Myers, D.N., 2004: Water quality in the Nation’s streams and aquifers–Overview of selected findings, 1991-2001: USGS Circular 1265, 20 p.
Izbicki, J.A., 2004, A small-diameter sample pump for collection of depth-dependent samples from production wells under pumping conditions: USGS Fact Sheet 2004-3096, 2 p.
National Research Council, 1993, Ground-water vulnerability assessment–Predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty: Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 204 p.
Nolan, B.T., 1998, Modeling approaches for assessing the risk of nonpoint-source contamination of ground water: USGS Open File Report 98-531, 15 p.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997, State source water assessment and protection programs–Final guidance: USEPA Office of Water, EPA 816-R-97-009.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999, A review of contaminant occurrence in public water systems: USEPA Office of Water, EPA 816-R-99-006, 78 p.
U.S. Geological Survey, 2002, Report to Congress, concepts for national assessment of water availability and use: USGS Circular 1223, 34 p.
U.S. Geological Survey, 2003, Principal aquifers of the 48 conterminous United States, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, available online at http://www.nationalatlas.gov/mld/aquifrp.html
The NAWQA Program
The study of public-supply well vulnerability is one of five national priority topics being addressed by the NAWQA Program in its second decade, which began in 2001. Other topics include effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems; ecological effects of nutrient enrichment; mercury in stream ecosystems; and sources, transport, and fate of agricultural chemicals. In addition, anthropogenic organic contaminants in source waters for many of the Nation’s largest community water systems are being assessed; concentrations in source waters are being compared to concentrations in finished waters. During the Program’s first decade, NAWQA scientists assessed surface- and ground-water chemistry, stream hydrology, habitat, and biological communities in 51 major river basins (“Study Units”; see map at http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa). Baseline assessments of pesticides, nutrients, VOCs, trace elements, dissolved solids, and radon, and of the condition of aquatic habitats and fish, insect, and algal communities are described in hundreds of reports, available at the Web site above. Reassessments planned in 42 of the Study Units in the Program’s second decade will determine trends at many of the streams and ground-water sites; fill critical gaps in the characterization of water quality; and build upon findings that show how natural features and human activities affect water quality and aquatic ecosystems.
This report is available online in Portable Document Format (PDF). If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat PDF Reader, it is available for free download from Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Download the report (PDF, 1.3 MB)
Document Accessibility: Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visually impaired. This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools convert Adobe PDF documents into HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text as audible speech. In addition, an accessible version of Acrobat Reader 5.0 for Windows (English only), which contains support for screen readers, is available. These tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at Adobe Access.
|AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices|