This report is available in pdf 497KB.
Estimates of the magnitude and frequency of floodpeak discharges and flood hydrographs are used for a variety of purposes, such as for the design of bridges, culverts, and floodcontrol structures; and for the management and regulation of flood plains. To provide simple methods of estimating floodpeak discharges, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has developed and published equations for every State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and a number of metropolitan areas in the United States. In 1993, the USGS, in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Federal Highway Administration, compiled all current USGS statewide and metropolitan area equations into a computer program, titled “The National Flood Frequency (NFF) Program” (Jennings and others, 1994).
Since 1993, new or updated equations have been developed by the USGS for various areas of the Nation. These new equations have been incorporated into an updated version of the NFF Program.
This Fact Sheet describes the application of the updated NFF Program to streams that drain rural areas in Virginia. Information on obtaining the NFF software and fact sheets for other areas of the Nation is provided at the end of this Fact Sheet.
Bisese (1995) developed regression equations for estimating peak discharges (Q_{T}), in cubic feet per second, at recurrence intervals (T) that range from 2 to 500 years. Separate sets of equations were developed for each of the eight hydrologic regions of Virginia (fig. 1). These regions were defined on the basis of physiography, drainage, and geographic grouping of regression residuals.
Figure 1. Hydrologic regions of Virginia. 
Recurrence interval is the reciprocal of the annual exceedance probability, and represents the average number of years between exceedances. For example, a flood peak discharge with an exceedance probability of 0.01 has a recurrence interval of 100 years. This does not imply that the 100year flood will be equaled or exceeded each 100 years, but that it will be equaled or exceeded on the average once every 100 years.
The regression equations were developed using peakdischarge data and watershed characteristics from 276 streamgaging stations in Virginia and 8 streamgaging stations in Kentucky. All stations used to develop the equations had at least 10 years of record between 1885 and 1991. Bisese (1995) summarized the peakdischarge estimates and watershed characteristics for the 284 streamgaging stations used to develop the regression equations, and for 79 additional stations in Virginia.
The regression equations are not applicable to sites affected by channelization, urbanization, or regulation. A drainage basin in which more than 10 percent of the drainage area is impounded was considered regulated.
The equations are based on the inchpound system of units, but the NFF Program will accept or report results in either the inchpound or metric system of units. The explanatory watershed variables used in the regression equations are as follows:
Drainage area (A), in square miles, is the total area that contributes runoff upstream of the stream site of interest and is determined from either 1:24,000 or 1:62,500scale topographic maps.
Main channel length (L), in miles, is the distance along the main channel from the stream site of interest to the drainage divide and is determined from the same maps as for drainage area. At stream junctions, the branch that drains the largest area is considered the main channel.
Main channel slope (Sl), in feet per mile, is the difference in elevations at points 10 and 85 percent of the distance along the main channel (measured from the location of the desired peak discharge to the drainage divide), divided by the distance between the points.
Mean basin elevation (E), in feet above sea level [National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929)], is the mean elevation of the drainage basin determined from 1:250,000scale topographic maps by the gridsampling technique. A transparent grid is placed over the map on which the basin boundary is drawn. The elevation is determined for at least 20 grid intersections within the basin, and the values are averaged.
Area of forest (F), is the percentage of drainage area, A, that is covered by forest. Forest areas were determined from USGS 1:250,000scale quadrangle maps by measuring areas with green overprint. A constant of 1 is added to F by the NFF program; the user enters the actual value of F.
The regression equations, the average standard errors of prediction, and the equivalent years of record are shown in table 1. The average standard error of prediction is a measure of the accuracy of an equation when used to estimate peak discharges for ungaged watersheds similar to those that were used to derive the regression equations. Errors in the estimates for about twothirds of the ungaged sites will be within the given standard errors. The average standard error of prediction increases appreciably when any explanatory watershed variable is near or outside the quoted range. The ranges of the explanatory watershed variables for which the equations are applicable are shown in table 2.
Table 1. Floodpeak
discharge regression equations and associated statistics for streams that
drain rural areas in Virginia (modified from Bisese, 1995) [Q_{T}, peak discharge for recurrence interval T, 2 to 500 years, in cubic feet per second; A, drainage area, in square miles; Sl, main channel slope, in feet per mile; L, main channel length, in miles; E, mean basin elevation, in feet above sea level (NGVD of 1929); F, area of forest, in percent] 



Regression equation  Average standard error of prediction, in percent 
Equivalent years of record 




Coastal Plain  
Q_{2} = 2.4A^{1.005}Sl^{0.852}  57.1  1.4  
Q_{5} = 4.0A^{0.999}Sl^{0.884}  59.7  2.5  
Q_{10} = 4.9A^{1.005}Sl^{0.932}  59.4  3.8  
Q_{25} = 6.0A^{1.016}Sl^{0.998}  61.0  5.6  
Q_{50} = 6.8A^{1.024}Sl^{1.044}  64.1  6.7  
Q_{100} = 7.6A^{1.033}Sl^{1.088}  68.5  7.5  
Q_{200} = 8.3A^{1.042}Sl^{1.130}  73.9  8.0  
Q_{500} = 9.2A^{1.055}Sl^{1.185}  82.7  8.5  
Northern Piedmont  
Q_{2} = 179A^{0.655}  51.1  1.6  
Q_{5} = 317A^{0.644}  49.3  3.3  
Q_{10} = 438A^{0.641}  50.2  4.9  
Q_{25} = 626A^{0.640}  53.8  6.7  
Q_{50} = 793A^{0.640}  58.0  7.7  
Q_{100} = 984A^{0.641}  63.5  8.2  
Q_{200} = 1,200A^{0.643}  70.1  8.5  
Q_{500} = 1,535A^{0.646}  80.4  8.6  
Southern Piedmont  
Q_{2} = 21.6A^{0.881}E^{0.310}L^{0.423}  40.2  2.8  
Q_{5} = 31.9A^{0.854}E^{0.351}L^{0.417}  35.7  6.2  
Q_{10} = 38.8A^{0.848}E^{0.379}L^{0.430}  35.5  9.3  
Q_{25} = 54.8A^{0.852}E^{0.392}L^{0.463}  38.0  12.3  
Q_{50} = 74.3A^{0.860}E^{0.390}L^{0.495}  41.4  13.6  
Q_{100} = 101A^{0.869}E^{0.382}L^{0.529}  45.7  14.2  
Q_{200} = 136A^{0.879}E^{0.373}L^{0.561}  50.6  14.4  
Q_{500} = 197A^{0.893}E^{0.361}L^{0.602}  58.0  14.2  
Blue Ridge  
Q_{2} = 95.4A^{0.760}  33.4  4.0  
Q_{5} = 201A^{0.726}  34.1  6.5  
Q_{10} = 298A^{0.710}  35.5  8.8  
Q_{25} = 450A^{0.695}  38.8  11.0  
Q_{50} = 584A^{0.687}  42.2  12.0  
Q_{100} = 735A^{0.680}  46.2  12.5  
Q_{200} = 907A^{0.674}  50.7  12.6  
Q_{500} = 1,165A^{0.667}  56.7  12.8  
Northern Valley and Ridge  
Q_{2} = 73.0A^{0.955}L^{0.307}(F+1)^{0.041}  37.8  3 .6  
Q_{5} = 119A^{0.953}L^{0.290}(F+1)^{0.063}  33.5  7 .4  
Q_{10} = 153A^{0.944}L^{0.273}(F+1)^{0.081}  31.4  12 .2  
Q_{25} = 196A^{0.931}L^{0.251}(F+1)^{0.107}  30.9  18 .5  
Q_{50} = 228A^{0.926}L^{0.241}(F+1)^{0.124}  31.9  22 .2  
Q_{100} = 263A^{0.925}L^{0.237}(F+1)^{0.138}  33.8  24 .4  
Q_{200} = 300A^{0.928}L^{0.239}(F+1)^{0.149}  36.3  25 .3  
Q_{500} = 356A^{0.936}L^{0.247}(F+1)^{0.161}  40.8  25 .1  
Central Valley and Ridge  
Q_{2} = 89.2A^{0.788}  31.0  4 .8  
Q_{5} = 222A^{0.712}  29.3  8 .7  
Q_{10} = 372A^{0.668}  28.6  12 .9  
Q_{25} = 647A^{0.620}  29.5  17 .5  
Q_{50} = 918A^{0.591}  31.4  19 .4  
Q_{100} = 1,254A^{0.565}  34.1  20 .2  
Q_{200} = 1,665A^{0.542}  37.4  20 .2  
Q_{500} = 2,354A^{0.514}  42.6  19 .5  
Southern Valley and Ridge  
Q_{2} = 45.7A^{0.880}  45.0  1 .7  
Q_{5} = 89.5A^{0.825}  43.4  2 .6  
Q_{10} = 127A^{0.800}  44.2  3 .3  
Q_{25} = 181A^{0.774}  46.6  4 .2  
Q_{50} = 228A^{0.759}  49.1  4 .7  
Q_{100} = 281A^{0.745}  52.0  5 .2  
Q_{200} = 339A^{0.733}  55.3  5 .5  
Q_{500} = 425A^{0.718}  60.2  5 .7  
Appalachian Plateaus  
Q_{2} = 262A^{0.749}Sl^{0.175}  33.6  3 .5  
Q_{5} = 134A^{0.844}Sl^{0.032}  21.3  12 .2  
Q_{10} = 103A^{0.880}Sl^{0.136}  18.1  23 .5  
Q_{25} = 90.4A^{0.902}Sl^{0.227}  19.3  31 .5  
Q_{50} = 87.0A^{0.910}Sl^{0.280}  21.9  33 .0  
Q_{100} = 85.7A^{0.916}Sl^{0.324}  24.7  33 .4  
Q_{200} = 85.0A^{0.920}Sl^{0.365}  27.9  33 .5  
Q_{500}= 85.5A^{0.923}Sl^{0.411}  31.9  33 .5  


Table 2. Range of explanatory variables for which regression equations are applicable (modified from Bisese, 1995)  


Hydrologic study region 
Drainage area, in square miles 
Main channel slope, in feet per mile 
Main channel length, in miles 
Average basin elevation, in feet above sea level^{1} 
Area of forest, in percent 



Coastal Plain—29 Sites  0.7–617  1.6–83  1.2–65  20–260  0–94 
Northern Piedmont—19 Sites  0.1–570  6.3–400  0.3–54  310–465  39–96 
Southern Piedmont—67 Sites  0.3–2,730  2.6–173  0.7–184  80–1,100  16–98 
Blue Ridge—54 Sites  0.6–1,340  7.8–880  1.0–131  560–3,280  16–99 
Northern Valley and Ridge—29 Sites  0.3–1,642  7.7–973  1.0–145  760–3,330  1–99 
Central Valley and Ridge—34 Sites  0.7–3,259  9.3–592  1.7–169  1,280–2,890  20–98 
Southern Valley and Ridge—35 Sites  1.2–672  9.7–324  2.2–124  1,500–2,810  4–95 
AppalachianPlateaus—17 Sites  0.7–554  10.2–510  1.3–53  1,450–2,500  0–96 


^{1}NGVD of 1929. 
The U.S. Water Resources Council (1981, appendix 8) described weighting techniques to improve estimates of peak discharge at gaged locations by combining the estimates derived from analysis of gage records with estimates derived from other means, including regression equations. The weights of the two independent estimates are based on the length of the gage record (in years) and the equivalent years of record of the applicable regression equation. The weighted estimate of peak discharge is computed as:
where
Q_{T(G)w}_{ }  is the weighted estimate of discharge Q for recurrence interval T at the gage location, 
Q_{T(G)s}  is the estimate of Q_{T} derived from analysis of the systematic gage records, 
Q_{T(G)r}  is the estimate of Q_{T} derived from application of the appropriate regression equation in table 1, 
N  is the number of years in the gage record used to compute Q_{T(G)s}, and 
EQ  is the equivalent years of record (table 1). 
The accuracy of the weighted discharge estimate, in equivalent years of record, is equal to N + EQ. The NFF Program contains an algorithm to perform these computations, which differs slightly from the computations described by Bisese (1995).
Bisese (1995) showed how the weighted estimate for peak discharge at a gaged site can be used to improve estimates of peak discharge at an ungaged site on the same stream that has a drainage area that is between 50 and 150 percent of the drainage area of the gaged site. The regression estimate for the ungaged site is multiplied by an adjustment factor, which is computed as:
where
AF  is the adjustment factor, 
ΔA  is the absolute value of difference in drainage area between the gaged site (A_{G}) and the ungaged site (A_{U}), A_{G} A_{U}, and 
R  is the ratio of the weighted peakdischarge estimate to the regression estimate for the gaged site, Q_{T(G)w}/Q_{T(G)r}. 
The adjustment to the weighted estimate at the gage site can be used when the drainage area at the ungaged site is within 50 to 150 percent of the drainage area at the gaged site. Otherwise, the estimate at the ungaged site should be based only on the appropriate regression equation.
When the drainage area of the site of interest is in more than one region, a weighted estimate of the peak discharge should be computed. The equations for the appropriate regions should be applied independently using basinwide estimates of the required explanatory variables. The weighted estimate is then computed by multiplying each regional estimate against the fraction of the drainage area in that region and summing the products. The NFF Program provides an algorithm for this computation.
Bisese, J.A., 1995, Methods for estimating the magnitude and frequency of peak discharges of rural, unregulated streams in Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey WaterResources Investigations Report 94–4148, 70 p.
Jennings, M.E., Thomas, W.O., Jr., and Riggs, H.C., comps., 1994, Nationwide summary of U.S. Geological Survey regional regression equations for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods for ungaged sites, 1993: U.S. Geological Survey WaterResources Investigations Report 94–4002, 196 p.
U.S. Water Resources Council, 1981, Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency: U.S. Water Resources Council Bulletin 17B, 28p. 14 appendixes.
For more information contact:
U.S. Geological Survey
Office of Surface Water
415 National Center
Reston, Virginia 20192
(703) 6485301
USGS hydrologic analysis software is available for electronic retrieval through the World Wide Web (WWW) at: http://water.usgs.gov/software/ and through anonymous File Transfer Protocol (FTP) from water.usgs.gov (directory: /pub/software). The WWW page and FTP directory from which the National FloodFrequency software and user documentation can be retrieved are http://water.usgs.gov/software/nff.html and /pub/software/surface_water/nff, respectively.
Additional earth science information is available from the USGS through the
WWW at http://www.usgs.gov/ or by calling
1888ASKUSGS.
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices  
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL: Page Contact Information: Contact USGS Last modified: Tuesday, November 29 2016, 05:53:29 PM 