U.S. Geological Survey Crustal Studies Technical Letter Number 17
AbstractA study of first-arrival amplitudes from 6 water shotpoints and 7 drill-hole shotpoints in parts of central and western United States indicate a variation of over 100 to 1 between the best and poorest shotpoints. Water shotpoints are, in general, superior to drill-hole shotpoints; however, one drill-hole shotpoint produced higher signal amplitudes than more than half of the water shotpoints. Signal amplitudes from drill-hole shotpoints varied by a factor of over 20. Saturated clay shooting medium appears to be the best shooting medium. Amplitudes from water shotpoints varied by a factor of about 10. Signal amplitude increases, in general, with water depth for bottom shots. |
For additional information: This report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. |
Jackson W.H., and Healy, J.H., 1964, Preliminary report on some factors affecting shotpoint efficiency: U.S. Geological Survey Crustal Studies Technical Letter Number 17, 23 p. (Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/misc/tl/0017/.)
Abstract
Introduction
Field Measurements
Shotpoint Evaluation
Summary
References