
Core OL-92 from Owens Lake, southeast California
AMS radiocarbon dates on sediments from Owens Lake Drill Hole OL-92
- James L. Bischoff
- U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California
- Thomas W. Stafford Jr.
- INSTAAR, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
- Meyer Rubin
- U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia
Contents:
Introduction
The Owens River system consisted of a chain of pluvial lakes occupying a
succession of closed basins in southeastern California. The lakes were
supplied primarily by the Owens River which drains the eastern side of the
Sierra Nevada, and during historic times Owens Lake has been the terminus
of the system. During extreme dry periods (interglacials), Owens Lake was
saline, alkaline, and biologically highly-productive. During extreme wet
periods (glacials), in contrast, the lake was flushed, overflowing with
fresh water, and relatively unproductive. To obtain a record of
variations in runoff, three 7.6 -cm diameter cores were drilled in Owens
Lake in the late spring of 1992. The three cores extend from 0.00 to
7.16m (OL-923), 5.49 to 61.37m (OL-92-1) and 61.26 to 322.86m (OL-92-2),
together representing about 800 kyr of sedimentation (Smith, 1993). We
report here on results of radiocarbon analyses of carbonates and humates
from the upper 31m of the section to place the upper part of the core in
temporal context. Our results indicate coherent and linear progression of
dates with depth down to 23m and 30 kyr. Scatter of results below this
depth indicate that the practical limit of radiocarbon dating in this core
is about 30 kyrs.
Stratigraphy and Sampling procedures
The Bishop Tuff, well-dated at 759 kyrs (Sarna and Pringle, 1992) was
encountered at 309m in the core (Sarna et al, 1993) indicating an overall
average sedimentation rate of about 40 cm/kyr. Correcting for less
compaction in the upper part of the core, we estimated the practical limit
of about 35 kyr for radiocarbon dating occurs at about 30m depth, and
limited our sampling down core to this level. Samples were taken from
cores 1 and 3 of OL-92 series. OL-92-1 was drilled by rotary drilling
down to 61m. Because the top 5.5m were disturbed by the drilling,
OL-92-3, essentially a pushed-in gravity core, was taken immediately
adjacent to the drilling pad to provide a high resolution sampling of the
top-most 7m of the section. This latter core (OL-92-3)was driven from a
back hoe-excavated 3.5m pit to a total depth of 7.16m below the surface.
The upper-most stratigraphy as exposed in the pit and in the two cores
(Smith, 1993) is as follows (present surface = 0): 0-0.94m artificial
fill; 0.94-1.3m historic salt bed; 1.32m - 5.16m oolitic sand; -5.16m to
bottom of core silty clay with occasional thin sand beds. The salt bed
was deposited between 1912 and 1921 as a consequence of the artificial
desiccation of the lake due to the diversion of the Owens River by the
City of Los Angeles (Smith, 1993). Thus, the natural section in the time
range of interest is characterized by a 3.8m bed of oolitic sand,
presumably forming up to historic time, overlaying silty clays. The
contact between the oolitic sands and silty clays is sharp and abrupt and
represents the most striking lithologic change in the entire core. In
fact, oolitic sands are absent throughout the rest of the section.
We took 8 samples of the oolites from depths between 3.72 and 5.12m from
OL-92-3, and 12 samples of silty clay from depths between 5.23 and 7.11m
from OL-92-3, and from depths between 7.21 and 31.13m from OL-92-1.
Correlation of beds between OL-92-1 and OL-92-3 based on lithology and on
measured depth was straightforward and unambiguous. Each sample consisted
of about 50 cc of wet sediment and represented about 3 cm of section. In
addition, we took two samples of silty clay sediment from considerably
deeper in the core, beyond the limit of radiocarbon dating in order to
asses the 14C background and contamination limits for dating this
material. These samples were taken at depths of 36.1m (ca. 50 kyrs) and
55.1m (ca. 80 kyrs).
Extractions and target preparation
The humate fraction of the organic material was extracted from the silty
clays by suspending the samples in 200 mls of 1N NaOH solution in capped
polyethylene bottles held in a 70°C oven overnight. The coffee-colored
supernate was then separated from the residual solids by filtering. The
supernate was then titrated to pH 5 with 3N HCl and the resulting
precipitate ("humate fraction") was collected on filter paper, rinsed with
distilled water and air-dried. Air-dried humate yields ranged from 12 to
200 mg, more-or-less in proportion to the bulk organic content of each
sediment sample. Humates were combusted to CO2 in sealed evacuated silica
tubes using CuO, Cu and Ag.
Oolite samples were cleaned, weighed, and acidified with 10% HCl in
vacuum. The resulting CO2 was dried by passing through an oxygen flow-
combustion train, using hot platinum as a catalyst and trapping water and
SO2. The CO2 gas volumes for oolites and humates were measured and
admitted to graphitizers designed for AMS target preparation (Vogel et
al., 1985). These small-volume units were charged with 400 Torr of CO2
and 900 Torr of H2. Heating overnight in the presence of iron and zinc
catalysts at 675°C produced sufficient graphite to be pressed into
targets for the Lawrence Livermore accelerator. All reactions were
carried to completion to eliminate isotope fractionation due to
processing. Replicate targets were made of 4 oolite samples and one
humate sample evaluate contamination during target preparation and to
evaluate precision.
For the two "infinitely old" control samples, targets were prepared of
the "total organic", "humate" and "humin" fractions to determine the
viability of the CuO-Cu-Ag procedure described above. For the total-
organic fraction, a decalcified sediment-sample was combusted. The humate
fraction was the NaOH extractable fraction from another aliquot, separated
out as above, and the humin fraction was the solid residue after NaOH
extraction. Graphite targets were prepared as above. Targets were
analyzed at the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectroscopy (CAMS) of the
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory by John Southon.
Results for the samples from the top 31m are given in Table 1 and Figure 1.
Results from the two deeper samples are shown in Table 2. Dates are
based on the Libby half-life (5568 yr), using an assumed d13C of -5 o/oo
for the oolites and -15 o/oo for the organic fractions. No attempt has
been made to calibrate the results to absolute years (e.g. Bard, et al.,
1990). Counting errors on individual samples are generally on the order
of ±2% or less. Replicates on the 5 samples for which duplicate targets
were prepared agreed within counting error for two of the oolite samples
(4.8m and 5.02 m) and between 5 and 6% for the other two oolite samples
and the single humate (3.82 m, 4.29m and 31.13m). Results on the
"infinite" samples indicate a probable limiting age of between 30 and 35
kyrs (Table 2). For the 36m sample, three replicate analyses of the total-
organic fraction yielded dates from 25 to 27 kyr, while the corresponding
humate yielded 30 kyr, and the humin 32 kyr. Similarly, the total
organics for the 55m sample yielded dates from 35.0 to 35.7 kyrs, the
humate 38, and the humin 37. Targets made from infinitely old calcite
yielded dates of 43.5 kyr while that of infinitely old coal yielded 35
kyr (unpublished data of U.S.G.S. Reston radiocarbon laboratory),
indicating contamination levels introduced during sample processing of
carbonates and organic matter and the ideal dating limits. The results
from the 55m sample are at this limit, whereas those at 36m are
considerable younger. Thus, we conclude that the practical limit for
dating humates from the Owens core is about 30 kyr, about the same as
encountered in radiocarbon analyses of organic material extracted from
other lake sediments (i.e., Robinson et al, 1988; Thompson et al, 1990).
This somewhat low limit is probably due to the relative ease of
contamination of the plastic and porous-wet sediment by the circulating
drilling mud that entrains and slurries younger sediments from the side
wall of the hole in the upper parts of the section.
Results on samples younger than the limit of 30 kyrs are relatively
coherent, and represent two linear trends with an apparent hiatus between
5100 and 8300 yrs bp (Table 1, Fig. 1). The twelve dates on the oolites,
which span only 1.25m of section (3.72 to 5.02 m) define a linear trend
which projects to a zero age at -1.5m depth. This depth is essentially
that of the base of the historic salt layer (-1.3 m), a result which adds
considerable confidence to the dates. The magnitude of the reservoir
effect on the dates (low initial 14C/C ratios in lake water), based on the
detailed analysis of Benson (1993) for nearby Walker Lake, should be on
the order of 200 years and certainly less than 500 yrs.
The dates on the humate extracts likewise result in a linear trend, except
for the three samples from -12.97 to -15.32 m. Reexamination of this
interval in the core indicated clearly that this section is slumped. The
character of this slumped sediment in texture, mottling, color, and
bedding is identical to that found above in the section between 8 to 9m
where the dates would plot exactly on the trend. The deepest samples at
23.27m and at 31.13m all give dates of 30 to 32 kyrs bp, essentially at
the practical limit as indicated by the deeper control samples. Thus, we
are left with a coherent trend in the humates beginning at the base of the
oolites at 8200 yrs to a date of 25,400 yrs at 23.27 m. The apparent
sedimentation rate of the oolites is 70 cm/kyr and that of the silty clay
is 83 cm/kyr. The contact between the oolites and the silty clays is
abrupt, the bedding apparently conformable, and there is no evidence of
pedogenesis at the top of the silty clay. We interpret the offset between
the two trends as a disconformity, possibly caused by a period of complete
desiccation of the lake followed by wind deflation of pre-existing
sediments, or, alternatively, a sublacustrine slumping away of part of the
section. The linear trend of the humate dates projects to zero age at
+2 m. Thus, because the true zero-age of the section is at -1.3 meters
(base of the salt), the amount of missing section represented by the
disconformity is about 3.3m.
Deeper in the core, there is no evidence of a significant change in
sedimentological conditions as might be expected for the Pleistocene/
Holocene transition, between 10,000 to 14,000 yrs. Rather the significant
change in lake conditions seems to have occurred only after 8200 yrs.
- AMS Radiocarbon dates from carbonates and
organic matter from sediments from drill hole OL-92, Owens Lake, CA.
The samples were analyzed at the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectroscopy
(CAMS) of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory by John Southon. Column
headings used in the table are listed below:
depth = depth in meters
material = oolites or humate
CAMS = Sample identification number used by CAMS
Lab = laboratory that prepared the sample, one of
B = Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
R = USGS, Reston
14C age = 14C age in years before present
error = estimate of uncertainty in the 14C age
- AMS Radiocarbon dates on various organic
fractions from two sediment samples from drill hole OL-92, Owens Lake,
taken from depths below radiocarbon dating limit (Extractions and
preparation of graphite targets carried out at Institute of Arctic and
Alpine Research 14C laboratory. Samples were analyzed at the Center for
Accelerator Mass Spectroscopy (CAMS) of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory
by John Southon.) Under "material", total refers to total
organics in the sample.
Depth 36m, approximate age 50 kyr before present:
material CAMS Lab 14C age±error
total 6923 B 27470±110
total 6924 B 26580±110
total 7562 B 25370±290
humate 6928 B 29550±190
humin 6926 B 31760±180
Depth 55m, approximate age 80 kyr before present:
material CAMS Lab 14C age±error
total 6921 B 35030±150
total 7563 B 35190±990
total 6922 B 36730±130
humate 6927 B 38430±170
humin 6925 B 36730±240
Figures
- AMS radiocarbon dates on sediments (oolites
and humate extractions) from Owens Lake Drill Hole OL-92.
References
- Bard, E., Hamelin, B., Fairbanks, R.G., and Zinder, A., (1990) Calibration of the 14C timescale over the past 30,000 years using mass spectrometric U-Th ages from Barbados Corals. Nature. v345, p. 405-410.
- Benson, L., (1993) Factors affecting 14C ages of lacustrine carbonates: timing and duration of the last highstand in the Lahontan Basin. Quaternary Research v. 39, p. 163-174.
- Robinson, S.W., Adam, D.P., and Sims, J.D. (1988) Radiocarbon content, sedimentation rates, and a time-scale for core CL-73-4 from Clear Lake Ca. in Sims, J.D., ed. Geol. Soc. Amer. Special Paper 214, p. 151-160.
- Sarna-Wojcicki, A.M., and Pringle, M.S. (1992) Lasar-fusion 40Ar/39Ar ages of the tuff of Taylor Canyon and Bishop Tuff, E. California-W. Nevada. EOS v.73, p.146 (Abs).
- Sarna-Wojcicki, A.M., Meyer, C., and Wan, E. (1993) Tephra in Owens Lake drill hole OL-92. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 93-683.
- Thompson, R., Toolin, L., Forester, R. and Spencer, R. (1990) Accelerator-mass spectrometer (AMS) radiocarbon dating of Pleistocene lake sediments in the Great Basin. Palaeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 78, p. 301-313.
- Smith, G.I., (1993) Field log of Owens Lake drill core OL-92. U.S.G.S Open-File Report 93-683.
- Vogel, J.S., Southon, J.R., Nelson, D.E., and Brown, T.A., (1984) Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nucl. Inst. and Meth., v. B5, p. 289-293.
U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
URL of this page: https://pubs.usgs.gov/openfile/of93-683/5-chronology/3-radio/ams14c.html
Maintained by: Eastern Publications Group Web Team
Last modified: 03.01.01 (krw)