U.S. Geological Survey

Alaska Aeromagnetic Data Processing


The assembly of 85 individual aeromagnetic surveys and grids to build the Alaska state-wide compilation was carried out in two stages. (1) A compilation for interior Alaska (spanning from 61 to 66 N latitude and 144 to 159 W longitude) was completed in 1994, (2) the rest of the state-wide compilation was completed in August 1997.

Data processing for the interior Alaska aeromagnetic data compilation was done by Paterson, Grant and Watson, Ltd, under contract to the State of Alaska, Division of Oil and Gas with cooperation from the USGS. Data from 25 aeromagnetic surveys were compiled. Paper maps at a scale of 1:500,000 were published by the USGS (USGS Map GP-1014; reference list ). These maps are available from USGS Map Sales (goto USGS Map Sales ).

Data processing for the state-wide compilation was done by Northwest Geophysical Associates under contract to the USGS. Data from an additional 60 surveys and previously processed grids were added to the interior Alaska compilation. In addition, some modification of the interior Alaska compilation was done to improve the merge to adjacent surveys in the northwest and southeast corners.

DATA PROCESSING STEPS

  1. Grids were constructed from the original aeromagnetic survey data with a cell size of between 1/3 and 1/5 of the flightline spacing of the survey, using a bidirectional gridding algorithm when necessary due to wide flightline spacing. For digitized contour line data, the initial grid was constructed using a minimum curvature algorithm and a spacing appropriate for the scale of the digitized map.
  2. Data quality problems were addressed in consultation with the USGS.
  3. The Definitive Geomagnetic Reference Field (DGRF) was applied for the date of the original survey (in some cases this required the determination and removal of the original reference field applied).
  4. The survey grids were regridded, as necessary, to the final grid cell size of 1 km using a minimum curvature algorithm.
  5. The datum levels of adjacent surveys were adjusted (by addition or subtraction of a constant value) to minimize differences at the boundaries.
  6. These adjusted grids were combined, leaving a 1 cell gap between surveys, into a composite grid (one of the final products).
  7. The original survey grids were upward or downward continued and converted from level to drape as necessary to produce a consistent survey specification of 1000 ft above ground. Upward continuation of the NURE surveys was by standard 2D FFT filtering techniques. Downward continuation and level-to-drape was performed using the COMPUDRAPE technique (as implemented in the GEOSOFT software package).
  8. The datum levels of the converted grids were then adjusted to minimize differences at the boundaries.
  9. These adjusted grids were combined into a single merged grid (with no data gaps inserted between surveys).

GRID PROJECTION SPECIFICATIONS


Top || Alaska mag || Minerals || Geology || USGS

USA.gov logo