USGS logo

STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS FOR THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION, 1998-2008

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-249--Contents page

Executive Summary

The Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey is a strong and healthy organization. We do important and highly relevant work and have many strengths that will help us to meet the challenges and take advantage of the opportunities before us. We are part of the U.S. Geological Survey, a national science organization with the ability to address the most complex scientific and technical issues facing the Nation. We have ongoing collaborations with the larger scientific community to address the most important problems in the science of hydrology. We have a strong base of cooperators, including Federal, State, and local agencies who help us address issues of mutual interest. Without the support of all of these partners, we could not achieve our mission.

This document presents three major premises that will guide the division over the next 10 years (1998-2008): (1) we will maintain and strengthen our scientific excellence and our partnerships; (2) we will make adjustments in skill mix, program emphasis, and approaches to staffing; and (3) we will maintain the flexibility to respond appropriately to unforeseen events.

As we look into the future, we believe that nine water-resource issues will receive increased attention from the hydrologic community and need increased emphasis from us--

We will make changes in our existing major program components--long-term data collection, interpretation and assessment, and research and development--to make them more effective. We recognize the strength that comes from having these program components in the same organization and will take action to improve linkages among them. We will make important short-term investments in new tools and capabilities to improve our field and laboratory methods, instruments, hydrologic models, data-base software, and information dissemination. We will significantly improve transfer of technology to our operational program.

We also will take action to restore balance among programs and among discipline areas. During the last 15 years, there has been significant growth in the interpretation and assessment component of our program. This is a very important part of our work and should be a significant percentage of the overall program because the products of our interpretive studies are directly and immediately relevant to decisionmakers. Our program in long-term data collection, however, has decreased as a percentage of our work to the point where it is too small a part of our overall effort. Therefore, we will work with the U.S. Department of the Interior, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Congress to shift our program balance to increase the percentage of funds available for long-term data collection. Similarly, we will work to increase the percentage of our overall effort directed toward ground-water and surface-water quantity so that we can improve our ability to meet both current and future needs.

Introduction

This document identifies goals and outlines strategic directions; it is not a detailed implementation plan. Ideas in this document will be implemented over time with the insight and guidance of our employees, our colleagues, and our customers and partners.

This document describes the mission and the future directions of the Water Resources Division (WRD) of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The initial draft of the document was prepared by a planning team that consisted of 22 senior managers and scientists from WRD. A large number of stakeholders improved the document through an extensive review process. We received comments from within WRD, and from other divisions of USGS, Department of the Interior (DOI) management and bureaus, other Federal agencies, State and local agencies, the academic community, and the private sector. The document was revised to respond to the concerns and support of these stakeholders. The primary audience for the document is internal, as it will help guide decisions at all levels of our organization. However, our stakeholders have indicated that they will find it helpful as they work with us to address issues of mutual concern.

"Strategic Directions for the Water Resources Division, 1998--2008" presents three major premises. First, we will maintain and strengthen those characteristics of scientific excellence, strong partnerships, and program balance that have been key to past successes and will be key to future success. Second, we will make adjustments in skill mix, program emphasis, and approaches to staffing that will improve our current and future position as a leader in hydrologic data collection, investigations, and research. Finally, we will maintain the flexibility that will allow us to anticipate and respond appropriately to unforeseen events. This document combined with other policy documents, is a compass that can be used by division decisionmakers to steer the organization in a positive direction.

This document complements and shares many of the attributes highlighted in the 1996 USGS Strategic Plan; however, the two documents differ in their scope. The USGS Strategic Plan gives general guidance for the bureau as a whole, whereas the WRD document provides detailed and specific directions applicable to the WRD.

The planning horizon for this document is 1998-2008. Within that timeframe, we identify some specific actions that will be accomplished in the near term. For example, we identify some high-priority activities that we will undertake within the next 5 years to improve our current capabilities. We anticipate that some changes and mid-course corrections may be necessary during the next several years as unforeseen events occur. Because most of the decisions that affect our stakeholders and human and financial resource allocations are made in WRD district offices, research branches, and other major field offices, it is important that all of these decisionmakers share a common understanding of who we are, what we stand for, and what our goals are for the future. Only then can WRD move in the directions outlined here and respond appropriately to signals in the external and internal environments that might require a shift in course.

At several places in the document, we identify target percentages for various activities. These percentages were arrived at through a consensus process using the planning team's collective expertise and records of WRD's mix of activities during the last 15 years. The target percentages apply to WRD as a whole, not to individual organizational units. They are not rigid requirements that will drive all decisions. Instead, they are guidelines that will help us track our progress towards an improved and better-balanced future.

"Strategic Directions for the Water Resources Division, 1998--2008" begins with a statement of the mission, activities, and success factors of the WRD in 1998 and then proceeds to consider changes in the global environment and in water-resources management that are likely during the next decade. Given a changing world, the section "Strategic Directions in Scientific Activities" of this document outlines water-resource issues that need increased emphasis, planned evolution of ongoing programs, and some short-term investments that are necessary to enhance current capabilities.

One theme that runs throughout the document is the requirement for us to listen to the needs of our stakeholders, which include the technical community who manage the Nation's water resources and Federal, State, and local regulatory agencies and land managers. We must design and conduct the best and most relevant science to meet the needs of these stakeholders. We must make the results of our scientific efforts available to them in a timely manner and a form that is most useful to them.

WATER RESOURCES DIVISION IN1998

WRD's mission and activities define the organization and distinguish it from other scientific or governmental organizations.

Mission

The mission of WRD is to provide reliable, impartial, timely information that is needed to understand the Nation's water resources. WRD actively promotes the use of this information by decisionmakers to--

Activities

Consistent with the accomplishment of our mission, WRD provides impartial, credible, and excellent science that is applied to issues relevant to water-resources management, protection from hydrologic hazards, environmental protection, and other public policies. In a world with many competing demands on water resources and considerable public attention to water issues, it is important for WRD to identify its primary strengths, establish priorities, do the things necessary to best serve the Nation, and do them extremely well.

Primary WRD activities include--

Success Factors

ABOUT A CHANGING WORLD

WRD has a responsibility to look into the future and to anticipate emerging issues. This responsibility requires evaluating how events taking place today or projected for the future might influence existing programs or the development of future programs.

In looking outward, the single most important global trend that underlies many issues is population growth accompanied by economic growth. United Nations projections suggest that the world could reach a population of 8 billion people by 2025 (compared to today's 5.5 billion people). A growing world population and world economy will increase the global demand for food. U.S. agriculture could become more intensive, with an increased use of chemical and biological products that could affect the environment and create a greater demand for water. The use of genetically engineered plant species and other aspects of biotechnology may reduce fertilizer and pesticide use but create problems with which we have little experience.

The influences of global-scale issues will be especially important in situations where human pressure on ecosystems and health systems is greatest. For example, significant impacts from global climate change could be exacerbated where a continent is most crowded, where aspects of the civilization are least flexible, and (or) where effects are added to other stresses.

Although population growth will not be as rapid in the United States as in less-developed nations, growth will likely lead to more rapid suburbanization around major cities and of once sparsely populated areas. Recent trends in U.S. demographics indicate that people have and will continue to relocate in areas at risk from hydrologic hazards, such as coastal areas, flood plains, the base of hillslopes, and alluvial fans. Increasing development in the United States will result in increased pressure to use terrestrial and aquatic resources of all types.

There is likely to be increasing concern about human and environmental health. This concern could be driven by an environmental catastrophe, such as a significant waterborne disease outbreak somewhere in the United States, or by conclusive proof that chemicals in the environment are causing reproductive stress or other significant but sublethal effects in animals or humans. Environmental concerns also could be driven by an accretion of smaller challenges. Even in the absence of significant new environmental issues, the costs of monitoring and treating drinking water, cleaning up existing contamination, preventing future contamination through effective isolation of municipal and industrial waste, and taking precautions to prevent accidental releases of contaminants will exert pressure on the U.S. economy.

Advances in technology, such as instrumentation, models, and biotechnology, will enhance our ability to detect, analyze, mitigate, remediate, and disseminate solutions to water-resource problems. Advances in analytical chemistry are allowing improved detection of contaminants, while increased knowledge of biology and ecology brings greater understanding of the impacts of environmental perturbations. Improvements in measurement of streamflow in real time and improvements in models for decisionmakers will facilitate new abilities to manage water more effectively but also will demand the highest degree of reliability and availability of those data. The recent tremendous increase in use of the Internet and other advances in communication make it possible to disseminate hydrologic and other scientific information to both the scientific community and the general public instantly and inexpensively.

Within the context of the broad trends described above, five requirements for successful water-resource management are likely:

  1. Active management for multiple uses.--Water resources will need to be managed simultaneously to provide water for human consumption, agriculture, industry, power generation, transportation, recreation, and habitat for fish and wildlife. These competing demands are already generating disputes in many parts of the country. In the future, needs for information will be greatest in arid regions, near the coasts, and in areas where water moves across State borders or between ground water and surface water.
  2. Effectiveness and efficiency.--The public will demand greater efficiency and effectiveness in environmental regulation and resource management. Issues that will be increasing in importance include (1) prevention of pollution, thereby avoiding the high costs of environmental cleanup, (2) site-specific evaluation of risks to water resources that will justify more flexibility in enforcing regulations, and (3) use of watershed-based management that will build on local interests and minimize the inefficiencies that come from managing only a part of the resource.
  3. Shift away from engineered solutions.--There will be less dependence on engineering solutions to water-quantity problems and more reliance on conservation and natural systems. Few new large water projects, such as dams or interbasin transfer systems, are underway or planned. Instead, water managers are using water conservation to reduce demand for water for irrigation, public supply, and industrial uses. Conservation has the added benefit of reducing the amount of water that must be treated after use. Water-resource managers are beginning to take advantage of natural systems to remove contaminants from water. For example, the use of natural or artificial wetlands in attempts to remove heavy metals from mine drainage is underway, and natural bacterial processes are being used to remediate contaminated ground water.
  4. Demand for timely information.--The public expects warnings of flood events and other hydrologic hazards. Farmers, public water systems, recreational boaters, and environmentalists all want near real-time information on the quantity and quality of the water they use. Water data must be provided in a timely fashion and must also be accurate. Yet, increasing accuracy often requires more time. Water-resource managers and those who supply water data will need to be aware of and address this dynamic tension between accuracy and timeliness.
  5. Increasing interest from the public--People are concerned about the availability and quality of water. Few major water-resource decisions will be made without coverage by the media and the attention of interested citizens. It is expected that citizen action and monitoring efforts across the country, which include watershed-management associations, farmers and growers associations, and environmental interest groups, will play an increasing role in managing and monitoring water resources.

STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS IN WATER RESOURCES DIVISION SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES

WRD must continue to be relevant and responsive. To do this, some changes in the nature of our scientific activities and the way we conduct our work are necessary. First, several water-resource issues will require increased emphasis. Second, our ongoing scientific program will evolve to be more effective and to achieve needed balance among program components. This evolution of our current program is expected to take time and may not be completed within the 10-year planning horizon; however, it is important to put ourselves on the trajectory to achieve our desired future. Third, we will make short-term (2-5 years) investments in technology and methodology to improve current capability.

Priority Water-Resource Issues

Nine water-resource issues have been identified for increased emphasis during the next 10 years. We believe that these issues will receive increased attention from the hydrologic community and need increased emphasis from us. Other issues and technical areas still have much value, and WRD will continue to collect data and conduct projects related to them. However, as projects end and new projects begin, we will direct more human and financial resources to the nine high-priority issues. For each issue, we provide some examples of activities that may be started or strengthened. Because of the importance of these issues to water-resource managers and the public, support for increased effort is expected from the Administration, Congress, cooperators, and partners.

WRD has a scientific infrastructure and much of the expertise needed to address these issues. We will build upon and enhance these strengths by forming partnerships with other USGS divisions, Water Resource Research Institutes, the academic community, and scientists from State, local, and other Federal Agencies. We also will work closely with land and water managers in the public and private sectors to better identify their information needs. Through these partnerships, we will form interdisciplinary teams to address the priority water-resource issues.

Issue 1. Effects of urbanization and suburbanization on water resources

Urbanization and suburbanization change the natural flow and recharge of water; introduce sediment, nutrients, and contaminants to surface and ground water; and increase demand for freshwater.

To address these changes, WRD will do the following:

Issue 2: Effects of land use and population increases on water resources in the coastal zone

By the year 2010, scientists estimate that 75 percent of the United States population will live within about 50 miles of the Atlantic and Pacific coast or one of the Great Lakes. Pressures on the coastal zone include an aging urban infrastructure, as well as demands for additional supplies of drinking water and a safe means to dispose of human and industrial waste that result from new growth. Population growth in the coastal zone also will add to stress on coastal ecosystems that provide recreation and critical habitat for waterfowl, shellfish, and finfish.

WRD will make an important contribution to coastal-zone water issues through the following:

Issue 3. Drinking water availability and quality

Drinking water in the United States is safe and abundant in most places. Maintaining a safe supply of drinking water in the future will require considerable expenditure of money for protecting drinking water sources, treating drinking water, and monitoring drinking water quality. Competition between cities and agriculture for water will be intense, and disputes will arise in cases where withdrawal of ground water or surface water for water supply may impact aquatic habitat.

WRD will make a valuable contribution to the issue of drinking water availability and quality through the following activities:

Issue 4. Suitability of aquatic habitat for biota

Aquatic habitat in this country has been severely altered by human activities, including construction, agriculture, and deforestation that increase sediment loads in rivers; construction of dams that impede migration of fish and other aquatic species; construction of dams and diversions that change the flow regime and modify habitat; drainage of wetlands areas; and increases in concentrations of nutrients and other chemicals in water.

Issue 5. Waste isolation and remediation of contaminated environments

There are several hundred thousand sites in the United States where the environment has been contaminated by past industrial, mining, military, agricultural, and commercial activity. The estimated cost of cleaning up these sites is as high as almost a trillion dollars. Costs of preventing future contamination are also significant for Federal, State, and local government, and the private sector as they attempt to manage industrial and domestic waste and find a suitable repository for radioactive waste.

WRD can make important contributions to risk evaluation, waste isolation, and remediation through its combination of knowledge of hydrology, chemistry, and biology and its ability to conduct complex interdisciplinary studies of environmental contaminants. Specifically, WRD will--

Issue 6. Hydrologic hazards

Every year hydrologic hazards (floods, droughts, subsidence, landslides, and tsunamis) result in the death of about a hundred people, in the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and in the disruption of thousands of lives. Better understanding of hydrologic hazards, better warning systems, and better risk information can minimize the consequence of these hazards.

Over the next 10 years, WRD will provide the information and understanding that will allow land and water managers, land-use planners, emergency management officials, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the general public to understand the nature of risk before a hazardous event occurs, to monitor development of hazardous events as they occur, and to take action to minimize the effects of future hazardous events. Examples of specific activities that WRD will undertake to address these issues include the following:

Issue 7. Effects of climate on water-resource management

Recent extreme climatic variations have demonstrated that water-resource managers must develop their management systems in a context that assumes a wide range of possible climatic conditions, including the potential for significant and long-lasting departures from historically normal conditions.

WRD will provide some of the ingredients for a robust water-management strategy, which include--

Issue 8. Surface-water and ground-water interactions as related to water-resource management

Management of water resources has focused traditionally on either surface water or ground water as if they were separate entities. Yet, nearly all surface-water features, including rivers, lakes, wetlands, and estuaries, interact with ground water. Development of either water source affects the quantity and quality of the other.

WRD will provide leadership on this important issue through the following activities:

Issue 9. Hydrologic-system management, including optimization of ground-water and surface-water use.

Recent experience with resolution of difficult water-management and allocation problems has shown that a capability to simulate the characteristics of the hydrologic system, at watershed scale, is critical. What is needed are water-management models that are accepted by the various competing interests in water conflict. These models must be capable of showing the consequences of various water-management decisions over a wide range of hydrologic and climatic conditions.

In recent years, simulation models have been combined with techniques of optimization to address various water-resources problems. Combined simulation and optimization models account for the complex physical processes of the hydrologic system and identify the best management strategy for a particular objective(s) and set of constraints. The approach offers a rigorous way to provide information of management relevance. As applied in USGS studies, management agencies and others provide information on the objectives and management constraints, whereas USGS scientists provide expertise in simulation and optimization techniques and help to formulate the management problem in a simulation-optimization context.

Evolution of Ongoing Scientific Programs

Overall, WRD's ongoing scientific and technical program can be described as a mix of (1) long-term data collection, (2) interpretation and assessment, and (3) research and development. During the next 10 years, these program components will evolve to be more effective, and we will work to achieve a better balance among them and among discipline areas.

Each of the three components has its own base of customers and constituencies, and each makes an important contribution to hydrologic understanding and the knowledge base needed for water-resource management and regulation. The real strength of WRD, however, comes from the combination of all three components and the linkages among them. For example, our ability to conduct assessments of the status of the Nation's water resources would be hindered without the long-term data-collection program. Similarly, our long-term data-collection program would be adversely affected without the new tools and understanding of hydrologic processes that come from research and development conducted by WRD scientists. Although the linkage and interdependence of the three program components are recognized, for purposes of this document each component and the new directions specific to that component will be described separately.

Long-Term Data Collection

The objectives of WRD's long-term data collection program are to collect, manage, and provide unbiased, scientifically based information that describes the quantity and quality of waters in the Nation's streams, lakes, reservoirs, and aquifers. This long-term program provides fundamental support for resource planning, development, management, and protection activities, as well as conflict resolution, scientific research, and warnings for water-related hazards throughout the Nation. WRD remains uniquely qualified to provide the basic hydrologic data to characterize the Nation's water resources. Important attributes of our long-term data-collection program include--

During the last several years there has been a decline in the long-term data-collection program. The number of continuous-record streamflow stations has been reduced; the number of stations included in the National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN) program and Hydrologic Benchmark Network program has decreased; and the ground-water-level network does not provide adequate national coverage.

The decline in basic hydrologic data collection is inconsistent with the increasing need for more comprehensive monitoring to support the intensive management and protection of water resources that will be needed as the Nation's population grows.

During the next 5 years, WRD will give high priority to redesigning and rebuilding its program of basic hydrologic data collection. Specific program issues, initiatives, and priorities are discussed below.

Surface Water

WRD will undertake the following strategic efforts in the next 5 years to enhance the streamflow data-collection program:

Ground Water

Strategic efforts WRD will undertake in the next 5 years to enhance the ground-water data-collection program include the following:

Water Quality

To enhance the water-quality data base, the WRD will undertake the following strategic efforts over the next 5 years:

Water Use

The WRD will undertake the following strategic efforts in the next 5 years to enhance the water-use data-collection program:

Interpretation and Assessment

WRD interpretive and assessment studies allow us to make contributions to issues that are useful to decisionmakers at all levels and to the general public. They keep us relevant and highlight emerging issues of importance to society. An important aspect of these studies is that data are turned into information of direct use to decisionmakers.

WRD has a key role to play in the water-resource community because we maintain a national perspective and can describe hydrologic systems that cross political boundaries. We are able to integrate data-collection and interpretive studies that are conducted across the country to build the bigger picture. These synthesis efforts are made possible because data are produced in a standard fashion and stored in a common data base. These syntheses are made easier when there is an overall framework for local projects.

WRD will undertake the following strategic efforts in the next 5 years to enhance interpretation and assessment studies:

Research and Development

Research and development provide the scientific infrastructure (expertise, accumulated knowledge, tools and techniques) that keeps WRD in the forefront of the hydrologic sciences and helps us to achieve our mission. Our scientists conduct both fundamental research that has long-term payoff and immediately relevant, problem-solving research that has short-term benefits. WRD's overall research effort has two components--(1) centrally managed research that is located primarily at three USGS regional centers and (2) distributed research that is located primarily in district offices. In the future, these two components, or research models, will retain their unique structural characteristics but will increasingly collaborate, communicate, and build on their commonalties.

While maintaining the internationally recognized quality of our research, we will continue to balance expenditures on research with other needs of the division. Decisions to hire new researchers in either of the research models described above will consider needs of the operational program, the national balance of discipline expertise, and new directions in hydrologic sciences. The concept that every major subdiscipline in hydrology should be covered in WRD must be reconsidered if resources shrink. If resources grow, then covering the base of subdisciplines that are relevant to the WRD mission will become more important than growing great depth in any single subdiscipline. In either case, our research staff will be developed around the principle of maintaining a balanced distribution of discipline expertise, rather than developing expertise solely on a geographic or issue-by-issue basis.

WRD will undertake the following strategic efforts to enhance research and development:

Balance Among Major Program Components

The keys to WRD's future success are a strong long-term data-collection program, a strong program of interpretive investigations and national and regional assessments, and a strong research and development program. We must also maintain an appropriate balance among these scientific activities. Ideally, the percentages of total available funds for the three components should be about 40 percent for long-term data-collection, about 45 percent for interpretation and assessment, and about 15 percent for research and development. The relative proportion of these three components will be out of balance if either long-term data collection or interpretation and assessment funding falls below 30 percent of total program or if research and development falls below 15 percent.

These three program components are not really separate; they are interdependent and linked. For example, projects with a primary focus on research or assessment may collect hydrologic data systematically over a long time period. Similarly, long-term data collection and interpretive investigations rely on the scientific infrastructure and accumulated knowledge that has been developed by researchers. Therefore, the percentages given above are approximate.

The history of the mix among program activities is as follows:

Percentage of overall funds for --
1982
1990
1998
Long-term data collection1 37 36 34
Interpretation and assessment
47
45
48
Research and development
16
19
18
       
1 Long-term data collection is defined as data that are collected consistently over a period of at least 5 years and typically for a much longer period of time. Thus, even though almost all projects collect basic hydrologic data, only those sites that are monitored continuously for at least 5 years are included in calculating the percentage of funds spent on long-term data collection.

From 1982 to 1998, there was only modest funding growth above inflation for streamgages and real declines in funding for NASQAN and ground-water monitoring. This is of special concern because of the importance of long-term data collection for water-resource management and to determine the effects on water resources of climate variability and land-use changes on water resources.

Balance Among Discipline Areas

WRD must also maintain a balance among the water-resource discipline areas. Ideally, this balance would be about 30 percent of total program funds spent for data collection and investigations that are related to surface-water quantity (includes floods), and about 25 percent for data collection and investigations that are related to ground-water availability. Of the remaining funds, about 25 percent would be spent for data collection and investigations of surface-water quality, including geomorphology, and ecology, and about 20 percent for ground-water quality. The ideal funding level for surface water is higher than that for ground water because of the extent of surface-water monitoring needed for flooding and hazard warning. Overall, there is a bias towards quantity and availability of water resources because of WRD's unique position as the Nation's primary collector of these data. WRD's overall program will be out of balance if any one of the four components falls below about 20 percent or rises above about 35 percent.

WRD will institute a system to track the percentage of scientific effort devoted to each of the four discipline categories described above--surface-water quantity, ground-water availability, surface-water quality, and ground-water quality. This is a different discipline breakdown than the one that has been used during the last 15 years when we used the categories ground water, surface water, water quality, and general hydrology to track our work. The history of the mix of disciplines in WRD programs is as follows:

Percentage of overall funds for --
1982
1990
1998
Ground water 20 20 15
Surface water
32
32
32
Water quality
22
23
25
General hydrology
26
25
28

During the last 8 years (1990-98), there has been growth in the water-quality area. This growth primarily results from increased work for the Department of Defense and the growth of the NAWQA program. The surface-water component has stayed constant between 1982 and 1998 but the number of interpretive studies, which were never a large percentage of the surface-water component, have had an overall decrease. The discipline that had the most significant decrease was ground-water resources, primarily because of completion of the Regional Aquifer-System Analysis Program.

As competition for water increases nationwide, the importance of ground-water and surface-water data, assessments, and models will continue to increase. The water-management community continues to point out the important role they believe the USGS should play in describing ground-water and surface-water systems and the relation between them, as well as in modeling these systems so that various management scenarios can be simulated to provide for sound long-term water-management decisions. WRD's ground-water and surface-water programs are currently too small to meet all these needs.

Investments in New Capabilities

WRD will make significant investments in new tools and capabilities to improve our field and laboratory methods, instruments, hydrologic models, data-base software, and information dissemination. An important aspect of this investment strategy is that we will significantly improve the transfer of new capabilities to our operational program so that we can better address priority water-resource issues and improve the effectiveness of our work and products.

The process of investing depends on the availability of the underlying scientific knowledge and technology. This process is a major responsibility of the research staff of WRD and also requires an understanding of the need for the tools. This comes about through communication among all parts of the WRD--district staff, regional staff, National Research Program, and headquarters units. The responsibility for providing a focus for the discussion and prioritization of needs and for assigning the individuals and needed resources for the development, testing, documentation, and training associated with these investments rests primarily with the Offices of Surface Water, Ground Water, and Water Quality, Federal program managers, and the Offices of the Assistant Chief Hydrologists.

The following discussions describe some of the top investment priorities for the next 2 to 5 years as opposed to the 10-year range that is the general rule for this document. These priorities must be reevaluated on a frequent basis.

Field and Laboratory Methods

The greatest needs for field and laboratory methods are (1) faster and less expensive ways to collect samples for chemical analyses that adequately represent the environment being characterized and (2) development of laboratory methods for analysis of contaminants at the very low concentrations at which they may affect human and aquatic health.

High-priority methods for development are described below:

Instruments and Technology

Although WRD obtains most of its instruments from the private sector, division scientists and technical experts have an important role in designing, quality assuring, and field testing new instruments. The WRD will continue to maintain facilities for testing and quality assuring existing and new instruments. In the next 5 years, we will increase our efforts to identify promising technology developed in other scientific or engineering fields that could be modified to collect data on water quantity or quality. We will also work with instrument designers and developers in other Federal Agencies and the private sector to bring them to our field sites where the instruments can be tested.

High-priority instrument development needs are described below:

Hydrologic Models

WRD is an international leader in the development and application of hydrologic modeling software, which is developed by our scientists to meet the mission of the division and then made available at no cost to the entire hydrologic science community. As water-resource issues evolve, new modeling capabilities and enhancements to existing modeling software are needed on a continuing basis to keep us on the forefront of quantitative hydrology.

To meet this increasing demand, we will do the following:

Data-Base Software

The goals for WRD data-management systems are to (1) eliminate any duplication of data-entry activities, (2) automate data transfer as much as possible, (3) provide powerful and easy-to-use tools for data-processing and data-quality control, and (4) provide tools to easily retrieve data in the volumes and formats that are useful to USGS employees, cooperators, and the general public.

Principles for development of a national water-information data base for WRD are as follows:

Information Dissemination

The primary stakeholders for WRD information and technology are (1) water managers with operational, day-to-day responsibilities for public-water supply and distribution, wastewater treatment, reservoir operation, power generation, and flood forecasting; (2) environment and natural resource managers and planners in local, State, and Federal Government and non-governmental organizations; and (3) the science and engineering community, including universities, water supply and treatment industries, mining and energy industries, agriculture and irrigation industries, and engineering and consulting firms.

The goal of WRD's information dissemination activities is to get our data, reports, methods, and models to our customers and partners in a form and within a timeframe that will allow them to use our products to demonstrably affect society's needs to make a better world. As a science bureau, we cannot ensure that our products are used. However, we have a responsibility to take steps that will foster their use. It is essential, therefore, that we actively work with our customers and partners to do the following:

Examples of specific goals for the information-dissemination activities include the following:

NEXT STEPS

A shared understanding of strategic directions is especially important for an organization like WRD because we have a distributed management structure. Many, if not most, decisions that affect our customer base and human- and financial-resource allocations are made in district offices, research branches, and other major field offices. Accordingly, the new directions contained in this document will be implemented at all levels of the organization. In some cases, special groups of individuals, such as the Computer Policy Advisory Committee or the Laboratory Advisory Committee, will be asked to develop specific implementation plans to move us forward in a specific area. Other directions will be implemented as district personnel discuss new project opportunities with cooperators or as research scientists decide future directions for their work. Participation by headquarters staff will be important in developing the ideas for investments and for our operational practices.

The process of developing this strategic directions report has caused WRD senior management to debate, evaluate, and reach new understanding on a wide range of issues. Many directions, priorities, and activities described in this document were implemented even before the document was finalized. Other strategic directions will be implemented over a longer period of time through the combination of many decisions by WRD management on topics, such as budget formulation, internal budgeting decisions that are related to investments, program development, and division policies. Within the first 6 months after release of this report, we will prioritize the remaining directions and activities, and appropriate groups will develop plans for rapid implementation of the highest priority items.

As WRD moves into the 21st century, we must be positioned to take advantage of new opportunities and successfully respond to new challenges. In the next 10 years, some changes are expected in what we do and how we do it. New water-resource issues will emerge; we will be prepared to meet them. There will be new customers and partners who have needs for water-resource information; we will be open to them. New technology will be developed that will allow us to do our jobs more effectively and efficiently; we will work to acquire this technology. It is the hope of the authors that this document represents a significant step toward defining our future and moving toward it.

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-249--Contents page

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Maintainer: Publications Team
Any comments or suggestions contact: Publications Team
Last updated:Wednesday, 07-Dec-2016 16:56:35 EST
URL: https://pub/water.usgs.gov/ofr99-249