U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-410
Survey vessel - Multibeam echo sounder data was collected aboard the Canadian Hydrographic Service vessel Frederick G. Creed, an aluminum SWATH (Small Waterplane Area Twin Hull) ship that surveys at speeds up to 16 knots. The ship has two submerged torpedo-shaped hulls that support the main deck via two thin struts. This design reduces wave motion on the ship and resistance to the ship's forward motion through the water, thus making it a very stable platform at high survey speeds. Stability of the ship is also enhanced by the computer-controlled action of four stabilizer fins located fore and aft on the inboard side of the hulls. The stabilizers control the pitch and roll of the vessel and allow adjustment of the heel and trim of the ship while under way.
The ship's position was determined with an accuracy of 10 m or better using a Magnavox 4200 geographic positioning system (GPS) receiver in conjunction with differential GPS corrections transmitted by U.S. Coast Guard radio beacons. At the start of each day, casts were made to record the sound velocity profile of the water column in the area to be surveyed. This information is used by the data acquisition system to correct for the refraction of the transmitted multibeam sound signal as it travels through the water to and from the sea floor. Sound velocity information was updated during the day whenever the survey moved from one area to another. Tidal corrections based on NOAA's Boston tide gauge were used to reference depth data to mean lower low water.
Multibeam data acquisition - The data presented here in the topographic and sidescan sonar backscatter images were collected utilizing a Simrad Subsea EM 1000 Multibeam Echo Sounder that is permanently installed in the hull of the Creed. The EM 1000 has 128 ceramic elements, operates at a frequency of 95 kHz, and will survey in water depths ranging from 5 to 1000 m. The raw data are logged on a Sun SPARCstation 10 using Simrad's Mermaid software and displayed on personal computers (PC's). When operating in water depths between 5 and 200 m, the EM 1000 produces 60 aimed beams spaced at intervals of 2.5 degrees, thus giving a total beam width of 150 degrees (75 degrees to each side of the vessel) which insonifies a strip of sea floor measuring in width approximately 7.5 times the water depth.
Signal processing methods that employ a combination of amplitude and phase detection are used to determine (for the patch of sea bed under each formed beam) the distance between the hull transducer and the sea bed. Values related to the strength of the returning signal for each beam are recorded and used to construct a composite seabed backscatter (reflectivity) image across the entire strip of insonified sea floor. Sounding rates depend on water depth but vary from 2 to 4 per second in water depths less than 100 meters. Horizontal spatial resolution at these sounding rates is on the order of 10% of the water depth at 16 knots; however, vertical resolution is approximtely 1% or better in the same depth range.
Both the bathymetric and the sidescan-sonar backscatter data are displayed in real time on the Sun workstation using software designed and written by the Ocean Mapping Group, University of New Brunswick. This display allows data gaps to be identified during the survey and also gives a measure of the data quality. An Applied Analytics POS/MV motion sensor located in the hull near the EM 1000 transducer detects changes in pitch, roll, and heave of the vessel. The motion information is recorded concurrently with the acquired multibeam signal and both are logged in a single file on the Sun workstation and made available to other workstations for further processing.
Data and image processing - After the echo sounder data was logged onto the hard disk of the Sun workstation, a suite of processing software developed by the Ocean Mapping Group was used to correct for artifacts and errors that may have been introduced during data collection. This software also enhanced the corrected data by resolving beam pattern and aspect ratio distortions and by imposing a linear contrast stretch before it generated bathymetric and sidescan sonar image mosaicks in a Mercator projection.
All data processing described here is initiated using onboard Silicon Graphics workstations as soon as each acquisition file is closed by the Simrad Mermaid workstation (usually at the end of each survey line). As tidal information is not available in real time, tidal corrections are merged into the sounding data files at the end of the day for subsequent grid file generation. Tidal information is essential for mapping the depth information over the course of the entire survey as all depths are referenced to mean lower low water. The processing and editing steps on board the ship are as follows:
a. Demultiplex, or unravel, the acquired Simrad signal to generate separate files containing navigation, depth soundings, sidescan sonar backscatter values, and sound velocity information.
b. Automatically reject bad data. For the multibeam soundings, reject data outside expected depth ranges (operator's decision based on nautical chart data); for navigation data, reject fixes with poor GPS statistics.
c. Edit the navigation data on-screen to remove undesirable points, including turns at the ends of survey lines.
d. Edit the multibeam soundings on-screen to remove individual anomalous soundings.
e. Merge tidal information and the corrected navigation back into the data files. Tidal information from the Boston tide gauge was obtained via modem from computers maintained by the Ocean and Lake Levels Division of NOAA in Silver Spring, Maryland. The tidal database is updated by NOAA approximately every six hours.
f. Initiate UNIX c-shell script files that map the bathymetric soundings from each processed data file onto a Mercator grid with node spacings and scale selected by the operator.
g. Concurrently, UNIX c-shell script files map the extracted sidescan sonar backscatter values onto a digital mosaic in the Mercator projection at a scale selected by the user.
h. Generate sun-illuminated bathymetric raster files using the mapped grid node information to depict the depth information in a shaded relief view.
A Mercator projection allows individual map areas to be joined edge to edge when creating a composite image. The sun-illuminated image shown here uses a sun elevation angle of 45 degrees from an azimuth of 350 degrees; and a vertical exaggeration of four times to emphasize seafloor features.
Data archival - Raw data logged by the Simrad Mermaid workstation is backed up each day on Exabyte 8 mm tapes and then transcribed to CD-ROM's after the end of the survey for more permanent and stable storage. The map products and processed data files are also saved onto 8 mm tapes; they were transferred to magneto-optical read-write media for easier access in the event post cruise processing was required.
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-410, Sheet 1
Bathymetric data were contoured using the Arc/Info geographic information system software (Environmental Systems Research Institution, Inc., version 7.03). Processed data were formatted into a point file using the Arc/Info "point generate" routine. The point file was transformed to a Mercator projection with the longitude of the central meridian at 70o 19'W and the latitude of true scale at 41o 39'N. The "point grid" routine was used to create a grid from the point file and to assign depth values to individual grid cells. The cell size of the output grid was 13 m. Topographic contours at 5-meter intervals were generated using the "lattice contour" routine.
Most of the contour lines are displayed here unedited. However, in areas of very smooth sea floor, some contours displayed distortions that are due to problems encountered during data acquisition at nadir (directly below the vessel's keel) and to refraction effects at the outermost edge of the swath. These distortions were smoothed by using a user-defined low-frequency "focal median" filter routine on the grid created by "point grid". Square focal median filters varying in size from 5 x 5 to 21 x 21 cells were tried, and a 9 x9 cell size was selected for Quadrangles 1-4 and 6-18; an 11 by 11 cell size was chosen for Quadrangle 5. The resulting contours were compared with features displayed in shaded relief seabed imagery of the same data and edited manually with "Arc/Edit" to remove small artifacts that remained after filtering. Each of the quadrangles was contoured independently, and contours that extend into adjacent quadrangles were edited manually to match at the boundary. This map shows contoured topography at an interval of 5 meters. Contours are shown in blue except for topographic lows which are shown in brown. The topographic contours are identical to those shown on Sheets 2 and 3 of this report.
Sun-illuminated Topographic Imagery
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-410, Sheet 2
This map combines contoured topography and sun-illuminated topographic imagery. The image shown here uses a sun elevation angle of 45 degrees above the horizon from an azimuth of 350 degrees and a vertical exaggeration of four times. In effect, topographic relief is enhanced by having the sun illuminate the sea floor from a position 10 degrees west of north so that shadows are cast on the southern flanks of seabed features. Unnatural-looking stripes and patterns oriented parallel or perpendicular to survey track lines are artifacts of data collection. Blank areas represent places where no data exists. The topographic imagery is identical to that shown on Sheet 3 of this report.
Major topographic features depicted in the maps were formed by glacial processes. In broad terms, these features are interpreted here to represent a geologic history that developed in several stages. Ice containing rock debris moved across the region, sculpting its surface and depositing sediment to form the large basins, banks, ridges, and valleys. Many other features observed here represent the latter stages of deglaciation. They are the result of processes at work when much of the area was covered by stationary rotting ice, and when at the same time small valley glaciers and ice falls were active in and near areas of high topographic relief. The sea invaded the region formerly occupied by ice, and glacial features were partly eroded and some new deposits formed. Today, the sea floor is modified mainly by strong southwestward-flowing bottom currents caused by storm winds from the northeast. These currents erode sediments from the shallow banks and transport them into the basins. With time, the banks become coarser, as sand and mud are removed and gravel remains; and the western flanks of the banks, as well as adjacent basins, are built up by deposits of mud and sand.
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-410, Sheet 3
This map combines the sun-illuminated topography with the backscatter intensity (shown here in color) of the sea floor. Backscatter intensity is a measure of the hardness and roughness of the sea floor as determined from the strength of sound waves reflected from the seabed during the survey. High-backscatter materials (red and orange) are coarse sand, gravel (including piles and ridges of boulders), and rock outcrops. Moderate backscatter (green) represents sand or muddy sand. Low backscatter (blue) represents sandy mud and mud. These interpretations apply best in regions of low regional topography, because steep slopes can divert the paths of some of the reflected sound waves away from the survey vessel. Thus, seabed that slopes steeply away from the survey track can produce a lower backscatter intensity than if it were level. Unnatural-looking stripes and patterns oriented parallel or perpendicular to survey track lines are artifacts of data collection. Blank areas represent places where no data exists. The topographic imagery is identical to that shown on Sheet 2 of this report.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]