By Allen F. Moench, Stephen P. Garabedian, and Denis R. LeBlanc
We have an html version of the abstract and table of contents below. The full report is available in pdf. Links to the pdf.
An aquifer test conducted in a sand and gravel, glacial outwash deposit on Cape Cod, Massachusetts was analyzed by means of a model for flow to a partially penetrating well in a homogeneous, anisotropic unconfined aquifer. The model is designed to account for all significant mechanisms expected to influence drawdown in observation piezometers and in the pumped well. In addition to the usual fluid-flow and storage processes, additional processes include effects of storage in the pumped well, storage in observation piezometers, effects of skin at the pumped-well screen, and effects of drainage from the zone above the water table. The aquifer was pumped at a rate of 320 gallons per minute for 72-hours and drawdown measurements were made in the pumped well and in 20 piezometers located at various distances from the pumped well and depths below the land surface. To facilitate the analysis, an automatic parameter estimation algorithm was used to obtain relevant unconfined aquifer parameters, including the saturated thickness and a set of empirical parameters that relate to gradual drainage from the unsaturated zone.
Drainage from the unsaturated zone is treated in this paper as a finite series of exponential terms, each of which contains one empirical parameter that is to be determined. It was necessary to account for effects of gradual drainage from the unsaturated zone to obtain satisfactory agreement between measured and simulated drawdown, particularly in piezometers located near the water table. The commonly used assumption of instantaneous drainage from the unsaturated zone gives rise to large discrepancies between measured and predicted drawdown in the intermediate-time range and can result in inaccurate estimates of aquifer parameters when automatic parameter estimation procedures are used.
The values of the estimated hydraulic parameters are consistent with estimates from prior studies and from what is known about the aquifer at the site. Effects of heterogeneity at the site were small as measured drawdowns in all piezometers and wells were very close to the simulated values for a homogeneous porous medium. The estimated values are: specific yield, 0.26; saturated thickness, 170 feet; horizontal hydraulic conductivity, 0.23 feet per minute; vertical hydraulic conductivity, 0.14 feet per minute; and specific storage, 1.3x10-5 per foot.
It was found that drawdown in only a few piezometers strategically located at depth near the pumped well yielded parameter estimates close to the estimates obtained for the entire data set analyzed simultaneously. If the influence of gradual drainage from the unsaturated zone is not taken into account, specific yield is significantly underestimated even in these deep-seated piezometers. This helps to explain the low values of specific yield often reported for granular aquifers in the literature. If either the entire data set or only the drawdown in selected deep-seated piezometers was used, it was found unnecessary to conduct the test for the full 72-hours to obtain accurate estimates of the hydraulic parameters. For some piezometer groups, practically identical results would be obtained for an aquifer test conducted for only 8-hours. Drawdowns measured in the pumped well and piezometers at distant locations were diagnostic only of aquifer transmissivity.
Abstract
Introduction
Background
Purpose and scope
Response of an idealized unconfined aquifer to pumping
Hydrogeology of the aquifer-test site
Acknowledgments
Mathematical model
Assumptions
Boundary-value problem
Dimensionless boundary-value problem
Laplace transform solution
Aquifer-test design and operation
Analyses
Preliminary analysis
Analysis by nonlinear least squares
Evaluation of Sy, Kr, Kz Using Late-Time Data (Step 1)
Evaluation of Sw Using Late-Time Pumped-Well Data (Step 3)
Evaluation of Ss Using Early-Time Data (Step 4)
Evaluation of Sy, b, Kr, Kz, and am Using Data for Entire Time Range (Step 5)
Discussion
Effect of heterogeneity on aquifer test results
Parameter-estimation experiments with drawdown data
Experiments with Pumped-Well Data
Experiments with Limited Piezometer Distribution
Experiments with Reduced Length of Test
Summary
Notation
References
Appendix I
Appendix II
The text and graphics are presented here in pdf format:
The full report is 961KB.
If you have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer, you may view and/or print the PDF version of this report. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, you may download it here.
| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices | |
  |
|