U.S. Geological Survey

Royal Society Range Aeromagnetic Data Processing


DATA PROCESSING STEPS
 

  1. Original binary data from each survey flight were converted to ASCII data. These data (sample frequency 1Hz) contain latitude, longitude, fiducial, GPS-time, raw magnetic total-field, barometric altitude (if available), and event mark. Data are organized in individual survey lines. According to the flight protocol, the beginning and end of each line as well as unusable sections of a line were identified and edited.

  2.  
  3. A first cut quality control was applied by visual inspection of line data including removal of spikes in all channels. Errors in time and horizontal positioning were also eliminated and interpolated (later corrected using differential GPS data).

  4.  
  5. Geographical coordinates were converted to the local Lambert coordinate system used for the survey.

  6.  
  7. Positioning data were recorded in-flight independently using a Trimble GPS receiver. For most flights GPS reference station data at either Skelton Neve Camp or McMurdo were available and a differential position was calculated. For gaps in differential positioning, original GPS Rover data were used, adjusted at both ends of any gap. These data were used to replace the latitude and longitude values (and the local Lambert coordinates subsequently) in the line data set.

  8.  
  9. Barometric altitudes are available for all flights, when the altitude did not exceede 10,000 ft. However, since air pressure was changing during a flight (locally and in time) barometric values were adjusted to differentially calculated GPS altitudes whenever this was possible. For the few cases of altitudes of more than 10,000 ft no barometric data are available so that GPS altitudes, preferably the differentially corrected altitudes, but in some cases also the simple flight GPS altitudes, were placed in the barometric altitude channel.  Altitude data were smoothed with a simple low-pass filter (20 points).

  10.  
  11. Diurnal correction of the magnetic field values was primarily done by subtracting the base magnetometer values recorded at McMurdo, Skelton Neve and Willie Field. At both sites data were collected in 1-minute intervals, which were smoothed with a 60-minute low-pass filter to exclude short-period time variations, thus avoiding introduction of anomalies in the survey data acquired some distance away from the base stations (Maslanyj and Damaske, 1986). The filtered base-station data were then interpolated  to 1-second intervals and subsequently subtracted from the survey's magnetic field values.

  12.  
  13. The internal (main-field) component of the magnetic field, calculated for each survey point using the IGRF (International Geomagnetic Reference Field) model 1995, updated to 12 January 1998 (as the central date for the whole survey), was subtracted from the magnetic field values.

  14.  
  15. After base station correction and IGRF removal, discrepancies between the magnetic field values at the intersections of profile- and tie-lines remained. The calculated deviations were minimized using an iterative levelling approach (Damaske et al., in press). In this way not only the higher frequency parts of the diurnal variation were accounted for, but also discrepancies due to differences in elevation or from any other effect were reduced. The overall root-mean-square error for intersection-differences in the final data set is less than 4 nT.

  16.  
  17. Grids were constructed from the final data set including all lines- and tie-lines using a cell size of  500 m (i.e. 1/5 of line spacing).


GRID PROJECTION SPECIFICATIONS
 


REFERENCES

MASLANYJ, M.P., & DAMASKE, D., 1986, Lessons regarding aeromagnetic surveying during magnetic disturbances in polar regions: British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 73, 9-17.

DAMASKE, D., MARCINKOWSKI, V., MÖLLER, H.-D., in press, Aeromagnetic survey in central Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica, during the GeoMaud expedition 1995/96: Lay-Out, Execution, and Data Processing: Geologisches Jahrbuch.


USGS Central Region
Geology
CICT Geology Search
USGS

USA.gov logo


For more information about this report contact: Eric Anderson