Open-File Report 2003-295

About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / Publication: FAQ

Trends of Abutment-Scour Prediction Equations Applied to 144 Field Sites in South Carolina

By Stephen T. Benedict, Nikhil Deshpande, Nadim M. Aziz, and Paul A. Conrads

Table of Contents

Figures

  1. Map showing location of physiographic provinces and bridge-scour study sites in South Carolina

2 – 5. Graphs showing:

  1. Median grain size of the original and second sediment samples
  2. Relation of observed clear-water abutment-scour depth and the 100-year-flow embankment length in the Piedmont of South Carolina
  3. Relation of observed clear-water abutment-scour depth and the 100-year-flow embankment length for the Coastal Plain of South Carolina
  4. Relation of the predicted 100-year-flow abutment-scour depth and embankment length compared with the envelope of observed abutment scour for selected sites in the Piedmont of South Carolina
  5. Sketch showing embankment length and obstructed flow area determined by projection of the bridge cross section onto the approach cross section
  6. Graph showing field observations of abutment-scour depth and predicted abutment-scour depth for the 100-year flow, computed with the original Froehlich equation with the factor of safety, for selected sites in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of South Carolina
  7. Sketch showing determination of embankment length blocking live flow
  8. Graph showing field observations of abutment-scour depth and predicted abutment-scour depth for the 100-year flow, computed with the modified Froehlich equation with the factor of safety, for selected sites in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of South Carolina

10–11. Sketches showing:

  1. Approach cross section with a well-defined low-flow channel, identifying areas used to determine hydraulic properties
  2. Approach cross section for swampy site with no well-defined low-flow channel, identifying areas used to determine hydraulic properties
  3. Graph showing field observations of abutment-scour depth and predicted abutment-scour depth for the 100-year flow, computed with the Sturm equation with the factor of safety, for selected sites in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of South Carolina
  4. Sketch showing approach cross section for swampy site with no well-defined low-flow channel, identifying the channel used in applying the Maryland equation

14–15. Graphs showing:

  1. Field observations of abutment-scour depth and predicted abutment-scour depth for the 100-year flow, computed with the Maryland equation with the factor of safety, for selected sites in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of South Carolina
  2. Field observations of abutment-scour depth and predicted abutment-scour depth for the 100-year flow, computed with the HIRE equation for selected sites in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of South Carolina
  3. Sketch showing definition of scour hole velocities, depths, and areas for equation 20
  4. Graph showing field observations of abutment-scour depth and predicted abutment-scour depth for the 100-year flow, computed with the Young equation for selected sites in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of South Carolina

18–22. Sketches showing:

  1. Topography of abutment scour at structure 014020100300 on S.C. Route 201 crossing the Little River in Abbeville County, South Carolina
  2. Topography of abutment scour at structure 254036300100 on S.C. Route 363 crossing the Coosawhatchie River in Hampton County, South Carolina
  3. Topography of abutment scour at structure 277008700100 on Road S–87 crossing the Coosawhatchie River in Jasper County, South Carolina
  4. Topography of abutment scour at structure 362017600400 on U.S. Route 176 crossing Indian Creek in Newberry County, South Carolina
  5. Topography of abutment scour at structure 367008100200 on Road S–81 crossing the Enoree River in Newberry County, South Carolina

Tables

  1. Range of selected properties for clear-water abutment-scour data collected in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of South Carolina
  2. Sites for which two-dimensional flow models were developed
  3. Selected basin characteristics for sites with two-dimensional flow models
  4. Selected abutment data for sites with two-dimensional flow models

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America home page. FirstGov button U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL: http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/ofr2003-295/contents.html
Page Contact Information: USGS Publishing Network
Page Last Modified: Wednesday, October 12 2006, 01:35:58 PM