Columbia River ESTR00030 Reformatted Raw Navigation Text Files

Frequently-anticipated questions:

• What does this data set describe?
  1. How should this data set be cited?
  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
• Who produced the data set?
  1. Who are the originators of the data set?
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
• Why was the data set created?
• How was the data set created?
  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
• How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?
  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the data, including topology?
• How can someone get a copy of the data set?
  1. Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
  2. Who distributes the data?
  3. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?
  4. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
  5. How can I download or order the data?
• Who wrote the metadata?

Title: Columbia River ESTR00030 Reformatted Raw Navigation Text Files

Abstract:

A two-week field operation was conducted in the John Day Reservoir on the Columbia River to image the floor of the pool, to measure the distribution and thickness of post-impoundment sediment, and to verify these geophysical data with video photography and bottom sediment samples. The field program was a cooperative effort between the USGS Coastal and Marine Geology Team of the Geologic Division and the USGS Columbia River Research Laboratory of the Biological Resources Division. The data collection was completed aboard the R/V ESTERO during September 13-27, 2000. The interest in sediment accumulation in the reservoir was two-fold. First, it was unknown how effective this reservoir was as a sediment trap to material that otherwise would have been transported down-river to the estuary and eventually to the ocean. The recent erosion of beaches along the Washington coast has been attributed to a decreased contribution of sediment from the Columbia River to the coastal system due to the damming of the river. Second, sediment accumulation on the floors of reservoirs along the Columbia River has been suggested to be diminishing salmon spawning grounds. The extent of changes in habitat since construction of the John Day Dam, however, had not been documented. Common data sets were needed to address both of these questions, and for these reasons this geophysical and sampling program was undertaken.

1. How should this data set be cited?

   Cross, VeeAnn A. , and Twichell, David C. , 2004, Columbia River ESTR00030 Reformatted Raw Navigation Text Files:.

   This is part of the following larger work.

   Cross, VeeAnn A. , and Twichell, David C. , 2004, Geophysical, Sedimentologic, and Photographic Data from the John Day Reservoir, Washington and Oregon: Data Archive and Preliminary Discussion: Open-File Report 2004-1014, U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Science Center, Woods Hole, MA.

2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

   West_Bounding_Coordinate: -120.685

   East_Bounding_Coordinate: -119.325

   North_Bounding_Coordinate: 45.933

   South_Bounding_Coordinate: 45.688

3. What does it look like?

4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

   Beginning_Date: 15-Sep-2000

   Ending_Date: 27-Sep-2000

   Currentness_Reference: ground condition

5. What is the general form of this data set?

   Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data

6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
   1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

   2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.000000.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222.
      

7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
   • VeeAnn A. Cross
   • David C. Twichell

2. Who also contributed to the data set?

3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

   VeeAnn A. Cross
   U.S. Geological Survey
   Marine Geologist
   384 Woods Hole Rd.
   Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
   

   (508) 548-8700 x2251 (voice)
   (508) 457-2310 (FAX)
   vatnipp@usgs.gov
   

These text files represent the raw navigation acquired on the cruise, including the fathometer data (point bathymetry data) collected on the cruise when available. WARNING: These data have not been checked for errors. No fathometer data was available for julian days 269, 270, and 271.

1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

   Date: 2000 (process 1 of 1)

   For data collected on julian days 259-267 (Sept. 15-Sept. 23) the navigation recorded with Coastal Oceanographics HYPACK software was reformatted using an AWK script. This text file has a total of 4 columns. Column 1: Date and time (GMT) as julian day(xxx):hour(xx):minute(xx):second(xx) Column 2: Longitude (decimal degrees) Column 3: Latitude (decimal degrees) Column 4: Depth from fathometer (in meters - because the number is negative, subtract 1 meter to account for draft).

   Julian days 269-271 (Sept. 25 - Sept. 27) GPS data were recorded using BlueMarble's GeoTracker software running within ArcView 3.2. For these days, no fathometer information was merged with the navigation string. An AWK script was used to reformat the navigation so that the text files (jd269.txt, jd270.txt and jd271.txt) have a total of 3 columns. Column 1: Date and time (GMT) as julian day(xxx):hour(xx):minute(xx):second(xx) Column 2: Longitude (decimal degrees) Column 3: Latitude (decimal degrees)

   Person who carried out this activity:
   

   VeeAnn A. Cross
   U.S. Geological Survey
   Marine Geologist
   384 Woods Hole Rd.
   Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
   

   (508) 548-8700 x2251 (voice)
   (508) 457-2310 (FAX)
   vatnipp@usgs.gov
   

1. How well have the observations been checked?

2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

   These text files represent all the raw navigation collected during the 2000 field work in the John Day Reservoir. The initial days (jd259 - jd267) were dedicated to sidescan-sonar and seismic-reflection mapping. The last 3 days (jd269-jd271) was dedicated to sediment sample and bottom photo/video collection.

5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none

Use_Constraints:

The U.S. Geological Survey must be referenced as the originator of the dataset in any future products or research derived from these data.

1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

   VeeAnn A. Cross
   U.S. Geological Survey
   Marine Geologist
   384 Woods Hole Rd.
   Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
   

   (508) 548-8700 x2251 (voice)
   (508) 457-2310 (FAX)
   vatnipp@usgs.gov
   

2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

   Downloadable Data

3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

   These data were prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. Any views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Although all data published in this report have been used by the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy of the data and related materials and/or the functioning of the software. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in the use of this data, software, or related materials.

4. How can I download or order the data?
   • Availability in digital form:

     Data format:	ASCII

   • Cost to order the data:

Dates:

Last modified: 09-Mar-2004

Metadata author:

VeeAnn A. Cross
U.S. Geological Survey
Marine Geologist
384 Woods Hole Rd.
Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598

(508) 548-8700 x2251 (voice)
(508) 457-2310 (FAX)
vatnipp@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:

FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

Metadata extensions used:

• <http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html>