Table 8.  New York City reservoir release design data (River Master daily operation record) [ft^3/s, cubic feet per second; (ft^3/s)-d, cubic feet per second days; Col., Column]
Advance estimate of discharge of Delaware River at Montague, N.J. exclusive of New York City reservoir releases										Computation of balancing adjustment
Date of advance estimate	Powerplant release forecasts		Uncontrolled runoff		Montague date	Discharge (ft^3/s)	Indicated deficiency (ft^3/s)	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)	Directed release (ft^3/s)	Adjusted directed release			Actual deficiency		Cumulative difference (ft^3/s)-d	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)
	Lake Wallenpaupack (ft^3/s)	Rio Reservoir (ft^3/s)	Current condition (ft^3/s)	Weather adjustment (ft^3/s)						Daily (ft^3/s)		Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d	Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d
2001	Col. 1	Col. 2	Col. 3	Col. 4		Col. 5	Col. 6	Col. 7	Col. 8	Col. 9		Col. 10	Col. 11	Col. 12	Col. 13	Col. 14
MONTAGUE DESIGN RATE = 1,810 (ft^3/s) -- DECEMBER 1, 2000 to MARCH 14, 2001 The estimate discharge at Montague was greater than the Montague design rate from Dec. 1, 2000 to March 14, 2001 MONTAGUE DESIGN RATE = 1,750 (ft^3/s) -- MARCH 15, 2001 to JUNE 14, 2001 The estimate discharge at Montague was greater than the Montague design rate from March 15, 2001 to May 12, 2001
May 10	0	64	1,400	22	May 13	1,486	264	-	264	268		268	178	178	+90	-9
11	0	112	1,361	304	14	1,777	0	-	0	0		268	239	417	-149	+15
12	0	112	1,336	52	15	1,500	250	-	250	253		521	483	900	-379	+38
13	0	112	1,312	2	16	1,426	324	-	324	324		845	574	1,474	-629	+50
14	0	0	1,251	0	17	1,251	499	-9	490	493		1,338	613	2,087	-749	+50
15	0	32	1,209	29	18	1,270	480	+15	495	500		1,838	540	2,627	-789	+50
16	0	0	1,085	72	19	1,157	593	+38	631	632		2,470	512	3,139	-669	+50
17	0	0	998	81	20	1,079	671	+50	721	723		3,193	533	3,672	-479	+48
18	0	32	998	41	21	1,071	679	+50	729	729		3,922	589	4,261	-339	+34
19	0	32	958	44	22	1,034	716	+50	766	767		4,689	427	4,688	+1	0
20	0	32	959	645	23	1,536	214	+50	264	265		4,954	0	4,688	+266	-27
The estimated discharge at Montague was greater than the Montague design rate from May 24, 2001 to June 14, 2001. Montague Design Rate = 1,800 ft3/s -- June 15, 2001 to October 31, 2001. The estimated discharge at Montague was greater than the Montague design rate from June 15, 2001 to June 30, 2001.
Col. 1 - Furnished by power company. Col. 2 - Furnished by power company. Col. 3 - Computed from index stations. Col. 4 - Computed increase in runoff based on quantitative precipitation forecasts. Col. 5 = Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3 + Col. 4.					Col. 6 = Design rate - Col. 5, when positive; otherwise Col. 6 = 0. Col. 7 = Col. 14 (4 days earlier). Col. 8 = Design rate - Col. 5 + Col. 7, when positive; otherwise Col. 8 = 0. Col. 9 = Col. 7 from Table 10. Col. 10 = Summation of Col. 9.						Col. 11 = Design rate - (Col. 9 + Col. 10 from Table 9), when positive; otherwise   Col. 11 = 0. Col. 12 = Summation of Col. 11. Col. 13 = Col. 10 - Col. 12. Col. 14 = Col. 13 divided by  -10, limited to ±50.

Table 8.  New York City reservoir release design data—continued (River Master daily operation record) [ft^3/s, cubic feet per second; (ft^3/s)-d, cubic feet per second days; Col., Column]
Advance estimate of discharge of Delaware River at Montague, N.J. exclusive of New York City reservoir releases										Computation of balancing adjustment
Date of advance estimate	Powerplant release forecasts		Uncontrolled runoff		Montague date	Discharge (ft^3/s)	Indicated deficiency (ft^3/s)	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)	Directed release (ft^3/s)	Adjusted directed release		Actual deficiency		Cumulative difference (ft^3/s)-d	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)
	Lake Wallenpaupack (ft^3/s)	Rio Reservoir (ft^3/s)	Current condition (ft^3/s)	Weather adjustment (ft^3/s)						Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d	Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d
2001	Col. 1	Col. 2	Col. 3	Col. 4		Col. 5	Col. 6	Col. 7	Col. 8	Col. 9	Col. 10	Col. 11	Col. 12	Col. 13	Col. 14
June  28	352	96	1,204	16	July 1	1,668	132	0	132	132	132	0	0	+132	-13
29	0	144	1,111	130	2	1,385	415	0	415	415	547	505	505	+42	-4
30	512	112	1,041	77	3	1,742	58	0	58	58	605	0	505	+100	-10
July     1	512	80	1,352	329	4	2,273	0	0	0	0	605	0	505	+100	-10
2	0	96	1,335	59	5	1,490	310	-13	297	297	902	556	1,061	-159	+16
3	512	96	1,149	43	6	1,800	0	-4	0	0	902	246	1,307	-405	+40
4	512	78	1,042	175	7	1,807	0	-10	0	0	902	46	1,353	-451	+45
5	0	80	1,140	5	8	1,225	575	-10	565	563	1,465	693	2,046	-581	+50
6	0	112	1,128	25	9	1,265	535	+16	551	551	2,016	601	2,647	-631	+50
7	448	96	1,065	57	10	1,666	134	+40	174	174	2,190	0	2,647	-457	+46
8	448	96	1,070	96	11	1,710	90	+45	135	135	2,325	79	2,726	-401	+40
9	448	64	1,204	83	12	1,799	1	+50	51	51	2,376	33	2,759	-383	+38
10	448	112	1,103	87	13	1,750	50	+50	100	100	2,476	211	2,970	-494	+49
11	448	96	1,137	33	14	1,714	86	+46	132	132	2,608	316	3,286	-678	+50
12	0	80	1,088	4	15	1,172	628	+40	668	667	3,275	977	4,263	-988	+50
13	58	96	896	1	16	1,051	749	+38	787	787	4,062	897	5,160	-1,098	+50
14	449	96	810	4	17	1,359	441	+49	490	489	4,551	449	5,609	-1,058	+50
15	449	96	754	70	18	1,369	431	+50	481	480	5,031	510	6,119	-1,088	+50
16	449	64	737	62	19	1,312	488	+50	538	538	5,569	568	6,687	-1,118	+50
17	449	80	702	32	20	1,263	537	+50	587	588	6,157	691	7,378	-1,221	+50
18	449	64	718	11	21	1,242	558	+50	608	607	6,764	657	8,035	-1,271	+50
19	0	64	689	2	22	755	1,045	+50	1,095	1,111	7,875	1,301	9,336	-1,461	+50
20	0	112	636	0	23	748	1,052	+50	1,102	1,101	8,976	1,151	10,487	-1,511	+50
21	449	112	604	0	24	1,165	635	+50	685	685	9,661	565	11,052	-1,391	+50
22	449	112	564	60	25	1,185	615	+50	665	665	10,326	608	11,660	-1,334	+50
23	449	80	523	53	26	1,105	695	+50	745	745	11,075	599	12,259	-1,184	+50
24	449	64	395	89	27	997	803	+50	853	853	11,922	697	12,956	-1,034	+50
25	449	48	375	86	28	958	842	+50	892	892	12,776	624	13,580	-804	+50
26	0	48	440	54	29	542	1,258	+50	1,308	1,308	14,079	1,263	14,843	-764	+50
27	0	80	490	4	30	574	1,226	+50	1,276	1,276	15,355	1,376	16,219	-864	+50
28	385	80	427	0	31	892	908	+50	958	958	16,313	978	17,197	-884	+50
Col. 1 - Furnished by power company. Col. 2 - Furnished by power company. Col. 3 - Computed from index stations. Col. 4 - Computed increase in runoff based on quantitative precipitation forecasts. Col. 5 = Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3 + Col. 4.					Col. 6 = Design rate - Col. 5, when positive; otherwise Col. 6 = 0. Col. 7 = Col. 14 (4 days earlier). Col. 8 = Design rate - Col. 5 + Col. 7, when positive; otherwise Col. 8 = 0. Col. 9 = Col. 7 from Table 10. Col. 10 = Summation of Col. 9.					Col. 11 = Design rate - (Col. 9 + Col. 10 from Table 9), when positive; otherwise   Col. 11 = 0. Col. 12 = Summation of Col. 11. Col. 13 = Col. 10 - Col. 12. Col. 14 = Col. 13 divided by  -10, limited to ±50.

Table 8.  New York City reservoir release design data—continued (River Master daily operation record) [ft^3/s, cubic feet per second; (ft^3/s)-d, cubic feet per second days; Col., Column]
Advance estimate of discharge of Delaware River at Montague, N.J. exclusive of New York City reservoir releases										Computation of balancing adjustment
Date of advance estimate	Powerplant release forecasts		Uncontrolled runoff		Montague date	Discharge (ft^3/s)	Indicated deficiency (ft^3/s)	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)	Directed release (ft^3/s)	Adjusted directed release		Actual deficiency		Cumulative difference (ft^3/s)-d	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)
	Lake Wallenpaupack (ft^3/s)	Rio Reservoir (ft^3/s)	Current condition (ft^3/s)	Weather adjustment (ft^3/s)						Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d	Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d
2001	Col. 1	Col. 2	Col. 3	Col. 4		Col. 5	Col. 6	Col. 7	Col. 8	Col. 9	Col. 10	Col. 11	Col. 12	Col. 13	Col. 14
July 29	385	80	372	0	Aug. 1	837	963	+50	1,013	1,010	17,323	1,050	18,247	-924	+50
30	385	71	351	0	2	807	993	+50	1,043	1,042	18,365	1,012	19,259	-894	+50
31	385	71	428	31	3	915	885	+50	935	932	19,297	942	20,201	-904	+50
Aug.  1	385	71	400	132	4	988	812	+50	862	863	20,160	883	21,084	-924	+50
2	0	71	376	160	5	607	1,193	+50	1,243	1,242	21,402	1,142	22,226	-824	+50
3	0	71	382	277	6	730	1,070	+50	1,120	1,120	22,522	1,280	23,506	-984	+50
4	321	71	398	16	7	806	994	+50	1,044	1,045	23,567	865	24,371	-804	+50
5	321	71	454	0	8	846	954	+50	1,004	999	24,566	649	25,020	-454	+45
6	321	128	438	10	9	897	903	+50	953	952	25,518	412	25,432	+86	-9
7	321	71	413	8	10	813	987	+50	1,037	1,039	26,557	439	25,871	+686	-50
8	321	128	424	81	11	954	846	+50	896	897	27,454	727	26,598	+856	-50
9	0	71	395	110	12	576	1,224	+45	1,269	1,266	28,720	1,206	27,804	+916	-50
10	0	128	376	55	13	559	1,241	-9	1,232	1,231	29,951	1,191	28,995	+956	-50
11	193	128	389	28	14	738	1,062	-50	1,012	1,013	30,964	1,123	30,118	+846	-50
12	193	128	415	71	15	807	993	-50	943	942	31,906	1,092	31,210	+696	-50
13	193	96	456	6	16	751	1,049	-50	999	998	32,904	1,138	32,348	+556	-50
14	193	128	437	0	17	758	1,042	-50	992	990	33,894	1,070	33,418	+476	-48
15	193	80	448	30	18	751	1,049	-50	999	997	34,891	927	34,345	+546	-50
16	0	0	427	19	19	446	1,354	-50	1,304	1,302	36,193	1,272	35,617	+576	-50
17	0	78	478	43	20	599	1,201	-50	1,151	1,144	37,337	1,306	36,923	+414	-41
18	160	78	469	160	21	867	933	-48	885	884	38,221	1,096	38,019	+202	-20
19	160	78	438	28	22	704	1,096	-50	1,046	1,044	39,265	1,154	39,173	+92	-9
20	160	53	431	42	23	686	1,114	-50	1,064	1,062	40,327	1,172	40,345	-18	+2
21	160	64	419	29	24	672	1,128	-41	1,087	1,085	41,412	1,215	41,560	-148	+15
22	160	0	396	17	25	573	1,227	-20	1,207	1,211	42,623	1,281	42,841	-218	+22
23	0	0	383	12	26	395	1,405	-9	1,396	1,392	44,015	1,552	44,393	-378	+38
24	0	80	399	24	27	503	1,297	+2	1,299	1,300	45,315	1,540	45,933	-618	+50
25	161	80	422	27	28	690	1,110	+15	1,125	1,123	46,438	1,313	47,246	-808	+50
26	0	80	400	24	29	504	1,296	+22	1,318	1,318	47,756	1,508	48,754	-998	+50
27	0	0	401	28	30	429	1,371	+38	1,409	1,409	49,165	1,559	50,313	-1,148	+50
28	0	71	351	13	31	435	1,365	+50	1,415	1,414	50,579	1,534	51,847	-1,268	+50
Col. 1 - Furnished by power company. Col. 2 - Furnished by power company. Col. 3 - Computed from index stations. Col. 4 - Computed increase in runoff based on quantitative precipitation forecasts. Col. 5 = Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3 + Col. 4.					Col. 6 = Design rate - Col. 5, when positive; otherwise Col. 6 = 0. Col. 7 = Col. 14 (4 days earlier). Col. 8 = Design rate - Col. 5 + Col. 7, when positive; otherwise Col. 8 = 0. Col. 9 = Col. 7 from Table 10. Col. 10 = Summation of Col. 9.					Col. 11 = Design rate - (Col. 9 + Col. 10 from Table 9), when positive; otherwise   Col. 11 = 0. Col. 12 = Summation of Col. 11. Col. 13 = Col. 10 - Col. 12. Col. 14 = Col. 13 divided by  -10, limited to ±50.

Table 8.  New York City reservoir release design data—continued (River Master daily operation record) [ft^3/s, cubic feet per second; (ft^3/s)-d, cubic feet per second days; Col., Column]
Advance estimate of discharge of Delaware River at Montague, N.J. exclusive of New York City reservoir releases										Computation of balancing adjustment
Date of advance estimate	Powerplant release forecasts		Uncontrolled runoff		Montague date	Discharge (ft^3/s)	Indicated deficiency (ft^3/s)	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)	Directed release (ft^3/s)	Adjusted directed release		Actual deficiency		Cumulative difference (ft^3/s)-d	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)
	Lake Wallenpaupack (ft^3/s)	Rio Reservoir (ft^3/s)	Current condition (ft^3/s)	Weather adjustment (ft^3/s)						Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d	Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d
2001	Col. 1	Col. 2	Col. 3	Col. 4		Col. 5	Col. 6	Col. 7	Col. 8	Col. 9	Col. 10	Col. 11	Col. 12	Col. 13	Col. 14
Aug. 29	0	0	273	22	Sept. 1	295	1,505	+50	1,555	1,555	52,134	1,555	53,402	-1,268	+50
30	0	71	267	81	2	419	1,381	+50	1,431	1,429	53,563	1,379	54,781	-1,218	+50
31	0	0	273	262	3	535	1,265	+50	1,315	1,317	54,880	1,407	56,188	-1,308	+50
Sept.   1	0	72	398	0	4	470	1,330	+50	1,380	1,379	56,259	1,439	57,627	-1,368	+50
2	353	72	387	7	5	819	981	+50	1,031	1,031	57,290	1,021	58,648	-1,358	+50
3	391	72	311	12	6	786	1,014	+50	1,064	1,062	58,352	1,082	59,730	-1,378	+50
4	161	71	297	17	7	546	1,254	+50	1,304	1,301	59,653	861	60,591	-938	+50
5	418	0	360	0	8	778	1,022	+50	1,072	1,073	60,726	883	61,474	-748	+50
6	0	0	309	0	9	309	1,491	+50	1,541	1,542	62,268	1,442	62,916	-648	+50
7	0	71	298	0	10	369	1,431	+50	1,481	1,480	63,748	1,390	64,306	-558	+50
8	353	71	273	8	11	705	1,095	+50	1,145	1,147	64,895	1,047	65,353	-458	+46
9	353	71	246	24	12	694	1,106	+50	1,156	1,156	66,051	1,066	66,419	-368	+37
10	353	85	232	21	13	691	1,109	+50	1,159	1,158	67,209	1,198	67,617	-408	+41
11	353	89	347	9	14	798	1,002	+50	1,052	1,053	68,262	993	68,610	-348	+35
12	353	71	332	123	15	879	921	+46	967	968	69,230	758	69,368	-138	+14
13	0	0	335	181	16	516	1,284	+37	1,321	1,320	70,550	1,290	70,658	-108	+11
14	0	0	435	2	17	437	1,363	+41	1,404	1,398	71,948	1,448	72,106	-158	+16
15	257	0	417	0	18	674	1,126	+35	1,161	1,163	73,111	1,163	73,269	-158	+16
16	257	0	408	4	19	669	1,131	+14	1,145	1,146	74,257	1,116	74,385	-128	+13
17	257	48	367	0	20	672	1,128	+11	1,139	1,139	75,396	1,139	75,524	-128	+13
18	257	0	345	18	21	620	1,180	+16	1,196	1,197	76,593	627	76,151	+442	-44
19	257	0	327	63	22	647	1,153	+16	1,169	1,169	77,762	639	76,790	+972	-50
20	0	0	330	672	23	1,002	798	+13	811	811	78,573	851	77,641	+932	-50
21	0	71	880	24	24	975	825	+13	838	839	79,412	1,219	78,860	+552	-50
22	194	71	724	1,480	25	2,469	0	-44	0	0	79,412	338	79,198	+214	-21
The estimated discharge at Montague was greater than the Montague design rate from September 26, 2001 to September 28, 2001.
26	194	0	1,747	65	29	2,006	0	-21	0	0	79,412	388	79,586	-174	+17
27	0	71	1,164	35	30	1,270	530	-21	509	510	79,922	970	80,556	-634	+50
Col. 1 - Furnished by power company. Col. 2 - Furnished by power company. Col. 3 - Computed from index stations. Col. 4 - Computed increase in runoff based on quantitative precipitation forecasts. Col. 5 = Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3 + Col. 4.					Col. 6 = Design rate - Col. 5, when positive; otherwise Col. 6 = 0. Col. 7 = Col. 14 (4 days earlier). Col. 8 = Design rate - Col. 5 + Col. 7, when positive; otherwise Col. 8 = 0. Col. 9 = Col. 7 from Table 10. Col. 10 = Summation of Col. 9.					Col. 11 = Design rate - (Col. 9 + Col. 10 from Table 9), when positive; otherwise   Col. 11 = 0. Col. 12 = Summation of Col. 11. Col. 13 = Col. 10 - Col. 12. Col. 14 = Col. 13 divided by  -10, limited to ±50.

Table 8.  New York City reservoir release design data—continued (River Master daily operation record) [ft^3/s, cubic feet per second; (ft^3/s)-d, cubic feet per second days; Col., Column]
Advance estimate of discharge of Delaware River at Montague, N.J. exclusive of New York City reservoir releases										Computation of balancing adjustment
Date of advance estimate	Powerplant release forecasts		Uncontrolled runoff		Montague date	Discharge (ft^3/s)	Indicated deficiency (ft^3/s)	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)	Directed release (ft^3/s)	Adjusted directed release		Actual deficiency		Cumulative difference (ft^3/s)-d	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)
	Lake Wallenpaupack (ft^3/s)	Rio Reservoir (ft^3/s)	Current condition (ft^3/s)	Weather adjustment (ft^3/s)						Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d	Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d
2001	Col. 1	Col. 2	Col. 3	Col. 4		Col. 5	Col. 6	Col. 7	Col. 8	Col. 9	Col. 10	Col. 11	Col. 12	Col. 13	Col. 14
Sept. 28	0	0	935	9	Oct. 1	944	856	-21	835	838	80,760	1,018	81,574	-814	+50
29	130	0	817	0	2	947	853	-21	832	834	81,594	964	82,538	-944	+50
30	130	0	692	0	3	822	978	+17	995	993	82,587	973	83,511	-924	+50
Oct.    1	130	128	628	0	4	886	914	+50	964	964	83,551	994	84,505	-954	+50
2	130	96	577	0	5	803	997	+50	1,047	1,046	84,597	1,086	85,591	-994	+50
3	130	0	539	5	6	674	1,126	+50	1,176	1,171	85,768	1,061	86,652	-884	+50
4	0	0	415	169	7	584	1,216	+50	1,266	1,269	87,037	1,349	88,001	-964	+50
5	0	0	437	141	8	578	1,222	+50	1,272	1,270	88,307	1,390	89,391	-1,084	+50
6	41	0	443	113	9	597	1,203	+50	1,253	1,252	89,559	1,222	90,613	-1,054	+50
7	82	0	438	14	10	534	1,266	+50	1,316	1,318	90,877	1,418	92,031	-1,154	+50
8	0	0	425	0	11	425	1,375	+50	1,425	1,422	92,299	1,432	93,463	-1,164	+50
9	0	0	395	0	12	395	1,405	+50	1,455	1,455	93,754	1,435	94,898	-1,144	+50
10	0	64	350	15	13	429	1,371	+50	1,421	1,422	95,176	1,332	96,230	-1,054	+50
11	0	0	351	94	14	445	1,355	+50	1,405	1,407	96,583	1,447	97,677	-1,094	+50
12	0	64	346	172	15	582	1,218	+50	1,268	1,267	97,850	1,327	99,004	-1,184	+50
13	0	0	352	100	16	452	1,348	+50	1,398	1,397	99,247	1,347	100,351	-1,104	+50
14	0	64	347	79	17	490	1,310	+50	1,360	1,359	100,606	1,289	101,640	-1,034	+50
15	0	0	414	9	18	423	1,377	+50	1,427	1,427	102,033	1,347	102,987	-954	+50
16	0	0	469	69	19	538	1,262	+50	1,312	1,312	103,345	1,332	104,319	-974	+50
17	0	0	538	20	20	558	1,242	+50	1,292	1,292	104,637	1,332	105,651	-1,014	+50
18	0	0	536	0	21	536	1,264	+50	1,314	1,312	105,949	1,382	107,033	-1,084	+50
19	0	0	476	0	22	476	1,324	+50	1,374	1,376	107,325	1,436	108,469	-1,144	+50
20	0	0	452	10	23	462	1,338	+50	1,388	1,388	108,713	1,438	109,907	-1,194	+50
21	0	0	436	20	24	456	1,344	+50	1,394	1,393	110,106	1,463	111,370	-1,264	+50
22	0	0	366	165	25	531	1,269	+50	1,319	1,318	111,424	1,278	112,648	-1,224	+50
23	0	0	348	71	26	419	1,381	+50	1,431	1,431	112,855	1,301	113,949	-1,074	+50
24	0	0	431	68	27	499	1,301	+50	1,351	1,349	114,204	1,319	115,268	-1,064	+50
25	0	64	517	17	28	598	1,202	+50	1,252	1,252	115,456	1,302	116,570	-1,114	+50
26	0	0	484	0	29	484	1,316	+50	1,366	1,366	116,822	1,356	117,926	-1,104	+50
27	0	0	467	0	30	467	1,333	+50	1,383	1,381	118,203	1,391	119,317	-1,114	+50
28	0	0	443	0	31	443	1,357	+50	1,407	1,405	119,608	1,415	120,732	-1,124	+50
Col. 1 - Furnished by power company. Col. 2 - Furnished by power company. Col. 3 - Computed from index stations. Col. 4 - Computed increase in runoff based on quantitative precipitation forecasts. Col. 5 = Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3 + Col. 4.					Col. 6 = Design rate - Col. 5, when positive; otherwise Col. 6 = 0. Col. 7 = Col. 14 (4 days earlier). Col. 8 = Design rate - Col. 5 + Col. 7, when positive; otherwise Col. 8 = 0. Col. 9 = Col. 7 from Table 10. Col. 10 = Summation of Col. 9.					Col. 11 = Design rate - (Col. 9 + Col. 10 from Table 9), when positive; otherwise   Col. 11 = 0. Col. 12 = Summation of Col. 11. Col. 13 = Col. 10 - Col. 12. Col. 14 = Col. 13 divided by  -10, limited to ±50.

Table 8.  New York City reservoir release design data—continued (River Master daily operation record) [ft^3/s, cubic feet per second; (ft^3/s)-d, cubic feet per second days; Col., Column]
Advance estimate of discharge of Delaware River at Montague, N.J. exclusive of New York City reservoir releases										Computation of balancing adjustment
Date of advance estimate	Powerplant release forecasts		Uncontrolled runoff		Montague date	Discharge (ft^3/s)	Indicated deficiency (ft^3/s)	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)	Directed release (ft^3/s)	Adjusted directed release		Actual deficiency		Cumulative difference (ft^3/s)-d	Balancing adjustment (ft^3/s)
	Lake Wallenpaupack (ft^3/s)	Rio Reservoir (ft^3/s)	Current condition (ft^3/s)	Weather adjustment (ft^3/s)						Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d	Daily (ft^3/s)	Cumulative (ft^3/s)-d
2001	Col. 1	Col. 2	Col. 3	Col. 4		Col. 5	Col. 6	Col. 7	Col. 8	Col. 9	Col. 10	Col. 11	Col. 12	Col. 13	Col. 14
Oct. 29	0	0	388	0	Nov. 1	388	1,267	-	1,267	1,269	1,269	1,274	1,274	-5	0
30	0	0	405	10	2	415	1,240	-	1,240	1,239	2,508	1,184	2,458	+50	-5
31	0	0	392	17	3	409	1,246	-	1,246	1,243	3,751	1,138	3,596	+155	-16
Nov.  1	0	0	386	62	4	448	1,207	-	1,207	1,203	4,954	1,178	4,774	+180	-18
2	0	96	382	64	5	542	1,113	0	1,113	1,109	6,063	1,124	5,898	+165	-17
3	97	0	386	17	6	500	1,155	-5	1,150	1,142	7,205	1,007	6,905	+300	-30
Montague Design Rate = 1,550 ft^3/s -- November 7,2001 to November 30, 2001
4	0	0	381	25	7	405	1,144	-	1,144	1,142	1,142	1,062	1,062	+80	-8
5	0	0	427	12	8	439	1,111	-	1,111	1,111	2,253	1,041	2,103	+150	-15
6	0	97	426	16	9	539	1,011	-	1,011	1,014	3,267	1,024	3,127	+140	-14
7	0	0	415	32	10	447	1,103	-	1,103	1,103	4,370	1,013	4,140	+230	-23
8	0	0	434	31	11	465	1,085	-8	1,077	1,077	5,447	1,067	5,207	+240	-24
9	0	0	461	7	12	468	1,082	-15	1,067	1,068	6,515	1,098	6,305	+210	-21
10	0	0	473	2	13	475	1,075	-14	1,061	1,061	7,576	1,071	7,376	+200	-20
11	0	0	474	0	14	474	1,076	-23	1,053	1,056	8,632	1,116	8,492	+140	-14
12	0	0	471	0	15	471	1,079	-24	1,055	1,055	9,687	1,065	9,557	+130	-13
13	0	0	442	0	16	442	1,108	-21	1,087	1,086	10,773	1,126	10,683	+90	-9
14	0	0	428	3	17	431	1,119	-20	1,099	1,098	11,871	1,078	11,761	+110	-11
15	0	0	429	11	18	440	1,110	-14	1,096	1,095	12,966	1,135	12,896	+70	-7
16	0	0	428	0	19	428	1,122	-13	1,109	1,111	14,077	1,161	14,057	+20	-2
17	0	0	424	42	20	466	1,084	-9	1,075	1,077	15,154	1,157	15,214	-60	+6
18	0	0	414	44	21	458	1,092	-11	1,081	1,082	16,236	1,142	16,356	-120	+12
19	0	0	407	42	22	449	1,101	-7	1,094	1,093	17,329	1,143	17,499	-170	+17
20	0	0	409	0	23	409	1,141	-2	1,139	1,137	18,466	1,167	18,666	-200	+20
21	0	0	416	0	24	416	1,134	+6	1,140	1,140	19,606	1,180	19,846	-240	+24
22	0	0	413	0	25	413	1,137	+12	1,149	1,152	20,758	1,132	20,978	-220	+22
23	0	64	411	84	26	559	991	+17	1,008	1,010	21,768	980	21,958	-190	+19
24	0	64	395	225	27	684	866	+20	886	887	22,655	667	22,625	+30	-3
25	0	64	421	361	28	846	704	+24	728	728	23,383	578	23,203	+180	-18
26	0	0	1,021	55	29	1,076	474	+22	496	497	23,880	607	23,810	+70	-7
27	0	0	916	77	30	993	557	+19	576	576	24,456	666	24,476	-20	+2
Col. 1 - Furnished by power company. Col. 2 - Furnished by power company. Col. 3 - Computed from index stations. Col. 4 - Computed increase in runoff based on quantitative precipitation forecasts. Col. 5 = Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3 + Col. 4.					Col. 6 = Design rate - Col. 5, when positive; otherwise Col. 6 = 0. Col. 7 = Col. 14 (4 days earlier). Col. 8 = Design rate - Col. 5 + Col. 7, when positive; otherwise Col. 8 = 0. Col. 9 = Col. 7 from Table 10. Col. 10 = Summation of Col. 9.					Col. 11 = Design rate - (Col. 9 + Col. 10 from Table 9), when positive; otherwise   Col. 11 = 0. Col. 12 = Summation of Col. 11. Col. 13 = Col. 10 - Col. 12. Col. 14 = Col. 13 divided by  -10, limited to ±50.