Surficial geologic map and geodatabase, Cuddeback Lake 30' x 60' Quadrangle, San Bernardino and Kern Counties, California

Metadata also available as

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:

Surficial geologic map and geodatabase, Cuddeback Lake 30' x 60' Quadrangle, San Bernardino and Kern Counties, California

Abstract:

A USGS surficial geologic mapping project, focused on the arid Southwest USA, conducted mapping and process studies to investigate landscape development and tectonic evolution. This project included the Cuddeback Lake 1:100,000-scale quadrangle located in the western Mojave Desert north-northeast of Los Angeles, between the southern Sierra Nevada and San Bernardino Mountains, in Kern and San Bernardino Counties, California. Geomorphic features include high-relief mountains, small hills, volcanic domes, pediments, broad alluvial valleys, and dry lakes. The mapped area includes pre-Tertiary plutonic, metavolcanic, metasedimentary, and other metamorphic rocks; Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic rocks; and Quaternary sediments and basalts. Included in the area are the El Paso, Lockhart, Blackwater, and Muroc faults as well as the central segment of the Garlock fault zone. The tectonically active western Mojave Desert and the variety of surficial materials have resulted in distinctive geomorphic features and terrains.

Mapping has shown that the tectonically active area near the Garlock fault zone and El Paso Fault influenced development of drainage networks; base level is controlled by fault offset. There is evidence of a late Tertiary drainage network preserved in remnants of alluvial fans and paleo-drainage deposits north of the El Paso Mountains, west of the Lava Mountains, and south and west of the Rand Mountains. Faults identified as being active in the Holocene based on displaced stream channels, scarps, and shutter ridges include the Cantil Valley, Lockhart, Garlock, and Rand Mountain faults. Previously unmapped Holocene and late Pleistocene fault strands identified near the Rand Mountains may represent a splay at the northwest termination of the Lockhart Fault. The informally named Grass Valley fault, NW of Black Mountain, is a right-lateral strike-slip fault that may be a splay of the Blackwater Fault. Holocene activity on the Grass Valley fault is indicated by one displaced early Holocene stream terrace. Mapped faults in Fremont Valley are tentatively identified as surficial expressions of the buried Cantil Valley fault.

Supplemental_Information:

The feature dataset 'Cuddeback' contains the feature classes 'cudd_contacts', 'cudd_faults', and 'cudd_polygons'. The 'cudd_contacts' arcs were used to build the polygons. The polygons are attributed using the 'cudd_unit_labels'. These then define the geologic units. These feature classes are topologically related and maintained in the geodatabase by the set of validation rules defined in 'Cuddeback_Topology'.

  1. How should this data set be cited?

Lee Amoroso and David M. Miller, 2006, Surficial geologic map and geodatabase, Cuddeback Lake 30' x 60' Quadrangle, San Bernardino and Kern Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report OFR 2006-1276.

  1. What geographic area does the data set cover?
  2. What does it look like?
  3. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

Beginning_Date: 1999

Ending_Date: 2005

Currentness_Reference: publication date

  1. What is the general form of this data set?

Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data

  1. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
  2. How does the data set describe geographic features?

Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:

Surficial geologic units are commonly thin (<2 m) veneers over older units including bedrock. Where this is common, the unit descriptors are shown on the map separated by a slash (/). The younger, overlying unit is listed first. For example, Qya/Qoa indicates a veneer of younger alluvial deposits overlying old alluvial deposits and Qye/fpg indicates a young eolian deposit over grus-producing felsic plutonic rock. This usage also applies to hillslope deposits, for example Qha/mv indicates abundant hillslope deposits over mafic volcanic rock.

The areal extent of some deposits is too small to show at the map scale. These are indicated by two or more deposits separated by a plus sign (+). The most common deposit is listed first, for example Qiag+Qoag indicates that both deposits are present and Qiag is more abundant than Qoag. Other deposits may be present and are less than 20% of the unit area. Compound units may also be veneers on older deposits. For instance, the unit Qye+Qae/Qilg indicates that the mixed eolian unit Qye+Qae overlies an older lacustrine unit.

Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:

Detailed description of entity and attribute information found in metadata for each feature class.


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

Lee Amoroso
U.S. Geological Survey
Geologist
2255 North Gemini Drive
Flagstaff, Arizona 86001
USA

928-556-7186 (voice)
928-556-7169 (FAX)
lamoroso@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

One of a series of 1:100,000 scale surficial maps and geologic databases of the Mojave Desert region produced to aid in understanding the potential long-term effects of urban development and land use. The multi-purpose surficial geologic maps and databases produced by this project contain information that is being used for land-management decisions with regard to (1) ground-water availability, (2) natural hazard risks, such as earthquakes, landslides, and debris flows, (3) ecosystem sustainability, (4) effects of climate change, and (5) soil compaction.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

Aydin, A., and Nur, A., 1982, Evolution of pull-apart basins and their scale independence: Tectonics v. 1.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 91-105.

Birkeland, P.W., 1999, Soils and Geomorphology: Oxford University Press, New York.

Other_Citation_Details: 430 p.

Birkeland, P.W., Machette, M.N., and Haller, K.M, 1991, Soils as a Tool for Applied Quaternary Geology: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, Salt Lake City, UT.

Other_Citation_Details: 63 p.

Boettinger, J.L., and Southard, R.J., 1991, Silica and carbonate sources for Aridisols on a granitic pediment, western Mojave Desert: Soil Science Society of America Journal v. 55.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 1057-1067

Boettinger, J.L., and Southard, R.J., Phyllosilicate distribution and origin in Aridisols on a granitic pediment, western Mojave Desert: Soil Science Society of America Journal v. 59.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 1189-1198

Bryant, W.A., 1987, Recently active traces of the Blackwater, Harper, Lockhart and related faults near Barstow, San Bernardino County: California Division of Mines and Geology.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 17, 7 plates at various scales.

Burke, D.B., Hillhouse, J.W., McKee, E.H., M, 1982, Cenozoic rocks of the Barstow Basin area of Southern California - Stratigraphic relations, radiometric dates, and paleomagnetism: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin Bulletin 1529-E, U.S. Geological Survey, Bulletin 1529-E, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: p. 16.

Carr, M.D., Christiansen, R.L., and Poole, , 1997, Bedrock geologic map of the El Paso Mountains in the Garlock and El Paso Peaks 7 1/2' quadrangles, Kern County, California: , U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigations Series MIS Map I-2389, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: scale 1:24,000.

Carr, M.D., Harris, A.G., Poole, F.G., and , 1993, Stratigraphy and structure of the Paleozoic outer continental margin rocks in Pilot Knob Valley: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin Bulletin 2015, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: p. 33.

Carter, B.A., 1980, Quaternary displacement on the Garlock Fault, California: South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, CA.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Fife, D.L., and Brown, A.R., eds., Geology and Mineral Wealth of the California Desert:p. 457-466.

Carter, B.A., 1994, Neogene offsets and displacement rates, central Garlock Fault, California: Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.

Other_Citation_Details:

in McGill, S.F., and Ross, T.M., eds., Geological Investigations of an active margin, 1994 G.S.A. Cordilleran Section Guidebook: p. 345-364.

Carter, J.N., Luyendyk, B.P., and Terres, R.R, 1987, Neogene clockwise tectonic rotation of the eastern Transverse Ranges, California, suggested by paleomagnetic vectors: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 98.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 199-207.

Clark, M.M., 1973, Map showing recently active breaks along the Garlock and associated faults, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-741,, Washington, D.C..

Cooke, R.U., and Mason, P.F., 1973, Desert Knolls pediment and associated landforms in the Mojave Desert, California: Revue de geomorphologie dynamique v. 22.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 49-60.

Cooke, R.U., and Warren, A., 1973, Geomorphology in Deserts: University of California Press, Berkeley.

Other_Citation_Details: 374 p.

Cox, B.F., and Diggles, M.F., 1986, Geologic map of the El Paso Mountains Wilderness study area, Kern County, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1827,, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: scale 1:24,000.

Davis, G.A., and Burchfiel, B.C., 1973, Garlock fault: an intracontinental transform structure: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 84.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 1407-1422.

Dibblee Jr., T.W., 1952, Geology of the Saltdale quadrangle, California: Bulletin 160, California Division of Mines, San Francisco, CA.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 43.

Dibblee, T.W., 1967, Areal Geology of the Western Mojave Desert, California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper Professional Paper 522,, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: p. 153, with 4 plates, scale 1:125,000.

Dibblee, T.W., 1968, Geology of the Fremont Peak and Opal Mountain quadrangles, California: Bulletin 188, California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, CA.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 64, four plates, scale 1:62,500.

Dibblee, T.W., 1985, Analysis of potential fault and seismic hazards to proposed Superconductor Supercollider site in vicinity of Edwards Air Force Base, western Mojave Desert, California.

Other_Citation_Details: 12 p. unpublished report for University of California at Davis

Dibblee, T.W., and Gay, T.E., 1952, Mineral deposits of the Saltdale quadrangle [California]: Bulletin 160, California Division of Mines, San Francisco, CA.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 45-64.

Dohrenwend, J.C., Wells, S.G., McFadden, L.D., an, 1986, Pediment dome evolution in the eastern Mojave Desert: Wiley-Interscience, London.

Other_Citation_Details:

p. 1047-1062., in Gardiner, V., ed., International geomorphology, 1986 : proceedings of the First International Conference on Geomorphology

Dokka, R.K., 1989, The Mojave Extensional Belt of southern California: Tectonics v. 8.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 363-390.

Dokka, R.K., and Travis, C.J., 1990, Late Cenozoic strike-slip faulting in the Mojave Desert, California: Tectonics v. 9.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 311-340.

Eghbal, M.K., and Southard, R.J., 1993, Micromorphological evidence of polygenesis of three Aridisols, western Mojave Desert, California: Soil Science Society of America Journal v. 57.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 1041-1050.

Eghbal, M.K., and Southard, R.J., 1993, Stratigraphy and genesis of Durothids and Haplargids on dissected alluvial fans, western Mojave Desert, California: Geoderma v. 59.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 151-174.

Fletcher, J.M., 1994, Geodynamics of large-magnitude extension: A field-based study of the central Mojave metamorphic core complex.

Other_Citation_Details: [Ph.D. thesis]: Salt Lake City, University of Utah.

Fletcher, J.M., Bartley, J.M., Martin, M.W., Gl, 1995, Large-magnitude continental extension: An example from the central Mojave metamorphic core complex: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 107.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 1468-1483.

Fletcher, J.M., Miller, J.S., Martin, M.W., Boe, 2002, Cretaceous arc tectonism in the Mojave block: Profound crustal modification that controlled subsequent tectonic regimes: Memoir 195, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Glazner, A.F., Walker, J.D., and Bartley, J.M., eds., Geologic Evolution of the Mojave Desert and Southwestern Basin and Range, p. 131-149.

Gale, H.S., 1946, Geology of the Kramer borate district, Kern County, California: California Journal of Mines and Geology v. 42.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 325-378.

Glazner, A.F., Walker, J.D., Bartley, J.M Flet, 1994, Reconstruction of the Mojave Block: San Bernardino County Museum Association, Redlands, CA.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Ross, T.M., ed., Geological Investigations of an active margin, Geological Society of America Cordilleran Section Guidebook, p. 3-30.

Gile, L.H., Hawley, J.W., and Grossman, R.B, 1981, Soils and geomorphology in the Basin and Range area of Southern New Mexico - Guidebook to the Desert Project: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM.

Other_Citation_Details: 222 p.

Hewett, D.F., 1954, A fault map of the Mojave Desert region [California]: Bulletin 170, California Division of Mines, Sacramento, CA.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Jahns, R.H., ed., Geology of southern California, p. 15-18, 1 plate.

Hewett, D.F., 1954, General geology of the Mojave Desert region, California, [part]1: Bulletin 170, California Division of Mines, Sacramento, CA.

Other_Citation_Details: in Jahns, R.H., ed., Geology of southern California, p. 5-20.

Hulin, C.D., 1925, Geology and oil resources along the southern border of San Joaquin Valley, California: Bulletin 95,, California Mining Bureau, Sacramento, CA.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 152.

Jennings, C.W., Burnett, J.L., and Troxel, B.W., 1962, Geologic Map of California - Trona Sheet:, San Francisco.

Other_Citation_Details: scale 1:250,000

Keenan, D.L., 2000, The geology and geochemistry of volcanic rocks in the Lava Mountains, California.

Other_Citation_Details: [M.S. thesis]: Las Vegas, University of Nevada

Loomis, D.P., 1984, Miocene stratigraphic and tectonic evolution of the El Paso Basin, California.

Other_Citation_Details: [M.S. thesis]: Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina

Loomis, D.P., and Burbank, D.W., 1988, The stratigraphic evolution of the El Paso basin, southern California: Implications for Miocene development of the Garlock fault and uplift of the Sierra Nevada: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 100.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 12-28.

Louie, J.N., and Qin, J., 1991, Subsurface imaging of the Garlock Fault, Cantil Valley, California: Journal of Geophysical Research v. 96.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 14,461-14,479.

Mabey, D.R., 1960, Gravity survey of the western Mojave Desert, California: Professional Paper 316-D, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: p. 51-73.

Machette, M.N., 1985, Calcic soils of the southwestern United States: Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Weide, D.L., ed., Soils and Quaternary geology of the southwestern United States, Volume Special Paper 203, p. 1-22.

McGill, S., and Rockwell, T., 1998, Ages of late Holocene earthquakes on the central Garlock fault near El Paso Peaks, California: Journal of Geophysical Research v. 103.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 7265-7279.

McGill, S., and Sieh, K., 1991, Surficial offsets on the central and eastern Garlock fault associated with prehistoric earthquakes: Journal of Geophysical Research v. 96.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 21, 597-21,621.

McGill, S., and Sieh, K, 1993, Holocene slip rate of the central Garlock fault in southeastern Searles Valley, California: Journal of Geophysical Research v. 98.

Other_Citation_Details: p.14,217-14,231.

McGill, S.F., Anderson, H., Daneke, T., Grant, 2003, Slip rate of the western Garlock Fault near Lone Tree Canyon, Mojave Desert, California: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs v. 35.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 64.

Michael, E.D., 1966, Large lateral displacement on the Garlock fault, California, as measured from offset fault system: Bulletin of the Geological Society of America v. 77.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 111-114.

Miller, D.M., and Yount, J.C., 2002, Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the north-central Mojave Desert inferred from fault history and physiographic evolution of the Fort Irwin area, California: Memoir 195, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Bartley, J.M., ed., Geologic Evolution of the Mojave Desert and Southwestern Basin and Range, p. 173-197.

Monastero, F.C., Sabin, A.E., and Walker, J.D., 1997, Evidence for post-early Miocene initiation movement on the Garlock fault from offset of the Cudahy Camp Formation, east-central California: Geology v. 25.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 247-250.

Oberlander, T.M., 1989, Slope and pediment systems: Belhaven Press, London.

Other_Citation_Details: in Thomas, D.S.G., ed., Arid Zone Geomorphology, p. 56-84.

Oskin, M., and Iriondo, A., 2004, Large-magnitude transient strain accumulation on the Blackwater fault, Eastern California shear zone: Geology v. 32.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 313-316.

Pack, R.W., 1914, Reconnaissance of the Barstow-Kramer region, California: Bulletin 541-E, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: p. 141-154.

Page, P.W., and Moyle, J., W.R., 1960, Data on water wells in the eastern part of the middle Mojave Valley area, San Bernardino County, California: Bulletin No. 91-19, California Department of Water Resources.

Other_Citation_Details: 223 p., 1 plate, scale 1:62,500.

Pampeyan, E.H., Holzer, T.L., and Clark, M.M., 1988, Modern ground failure in the Garlock fault zone, Fremont Valley, California: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 100.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 677-691.

Peltzer, G., Crampe, F., Hensley, S., and Ro, 2001, Transient strain accumulation and fault interaction in the Eastern California Shear Zone: Geology v. 29.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 975-978.

Rowlands, P.G., 1995, Regional bioclimatology of the California Desert: University of California, Riverside Press, Riverside, CA.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Latting, J., and Rowlands, P.G., eds., The California Desert: An Introduction to Natural Resources and Man's Impact, p. 95-134.

Schell, B.A., 1994, Newly discovered faults along the northwest extension of the Lockhart fault zone, Mojave Desert, Kern County, California: South Coast Geological Society, Santa Ana, CA.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Murbach, D., and Baldwin, J., eds., Mojave Desert, p. 239-252.

Smith, E.I., Sanchez, A., Keenan, D.L., and , 2002, Stratigraphy and geochemistry of volcanic rocks in the Lava Mountains, California: Implications for the Miocene development of the Garlock Fault: Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.

Other_Citation_Details:

in Glazner, A.F., Walker, J.D., and Bartley, J.M., eds., Geologic Evolution of the Mojave Desert and Southwestern Basin and Range, Memoir 195, p. 151-160.

Smith, G.I., 1964, Geology and volcanic petrology of the Lava Mountains, San Bernardino County, California: Professional Paper 457, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: p. 97, 1 sheet, 1: 24, 000.

Smith, G.I., 1991, Anomalous folds associated with the east-central part of the Garlock fault, southeast California: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 103.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 615-624.

Troxel, B.W., and Morton, P.K., 1962, Geologic Map of Kern County: California Division of Mines and Geology, San Francisco.

Other_Citation_Details: scale 1:250,000.

Westaway, R., 1995, Deformation around stepovers in strike-slip fault zones: Journal of Structural Geology v. 17.

Other_Citation_Details: p. 831-846.

Yount, J.C., Schermer, E.R., Felger, T.J., M, 1994, Preliminary geologic map of Fort Irwin Basin, north-central Mojave Desert, California: Open-File Report 94-173, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C..

Other_Citation_Details: 1:24,000 scale, 27 p.


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

This report is designed to describe completely the surficial geology at a 1:100,000 scale. Geologic information only mappable at a larger scale has been included in portions of the map to illustrate geomorphic response to neotectonism. All geospatial database elements are attributed.

  1. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

Polygon and chain-node topology present. Polygons intersecting the lines that compose the map boundary are closed by that boundary. Polygons internal to the map boundary are completely enclosed by line segments which are themselves a set of sequentially numbered coordinate pairs. Point data are represented by coordinate pairs.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: None

Use_Constraints:

Uses of this digital geologic map should not violate the spatial resolution of the data. Although the digital form of the data removes the constraint imposed by the scale of a paper map, the detail and accuracy inherent in map scale are also present in the digital data. The fact that this database was edited for a scale of 1:100,000 means that higher resolution information is not present in the dataset. Plotting at scales larger than 1:100,000 will not yield greater real detail, although it may reveal fine-scale irregularities below the intended resolution of the database. Similarly, where this database is used in combination with other data of higher resolution, the resolution of the combined output will be limited by the lower resolution of these data.

Any hardcopies utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If users modify the data in any way they are obligated to describe the types of modifications they have performed. User specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes they made were approved by the U.S. Geological Survey.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

U.S. Geological Survey Information Services
25286 Denver Federal Center
Denver, CO 80225
USA

1-888-ASK-USGS (voice)
ask@usgs.gov

  1. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?
  2. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides these geographic data "as is." The USGS makes no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of information contained in the geographic data. The USGS further makes no warranties, either expressed or implied as to any other matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the product, or its fitness for any particular purpose. The burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. Although these data have been processed successfully on computers at the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS regarding the use of these data on any other system, nor does the fact of distribution consititute or imply any such warranty.

In no event shall the USGS have any liability whatsoever for payment of any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or tort damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, any loss of profits arising out of use of or reliance on the geographic data or arising out of delivery, installation, operation, or support by the USGS.

  1. How can I download or order the data?

Data format:

Published document for use in ArcReader

Network links:

<http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1276>


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:

Last modified: 16-Aug-2006

Metadata author:

Lee Amoroso
U.S. Geological Survey
Geologist
2255 North Gemini Drive
Flagstaff, Arizona 86001
USA

928-556-7186 (voice)
928-556-7169 (FAX)
lamoroso@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:

FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata


Generated by mp version 2.8.6 on Wed Aug 16 14:39:13 2006
Modified November 28, 2006 (mfd)