U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1001
Executive SummaryIn response to the June
15, 2010 request from the Polish Geological Institute (PGI) to the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) for assistance and advice regarding real-time
landslide monitoring, landslide specialists from the USGS Landslide Hazard
Program visited PGI headquarters and field sites in September 2010. During our
visit we became familiar with characteristics of landslides in the Polish
Carpathians, reviewed PGI monitoring techniques, and assessed needs for
monitoring at recently activated landslides. Visits to several
landslides that are monitored by PGI (the Just, Hańczowa, Szymbark,
Siercza and Łasńica landslides) revealed that current data collection
(monthly GPS and inclinometer surveys, hourly piezometers readings) is
generally sufficient for collecting basic information about landslide
displacement, depth, and groundwater conditions. Large landslides are typically
hydrologically complex, and we would expect such complexity in Carpathian
landslides, given the alternating shale and sandstone stratigraphy and complex
geologic structures of the flysch bedrock. Consequently groundwater
observations could be improved by installing several piezometers that sample
the basal shear zone of each landslide being monitored by PGI. These could be
supplemented by additional piezometers at shallower depths to help clarify
general flow directions and hydraulic gradients. Remedial works at Hańczowa
make the landslide unsuitable for monitoring as part of an early warning
network. Monitoring there should focus on continued performance of the remedial
works. Our suggestions for new
monitoring at recently activated landslides are summarized in table 1. Displacement
monitoring using extensometers and (or) GPS is a high priority at Kłodne, Łaśnica,
Łazki, and Siedloki. Geomorphologic mapping of active surface features
(scarps, cracks, shear zones, folds, and thrusts) in sufficient detail to
reveal the kinematics of each landslide would greatly help in planning
subsurface exploration and monitoring. Mapping should take advantage of
existing and future airborne lidar data sets of specific areas, where
available. Borehole inclinometers and piezometers would complete the basic
monitoring package for these landslides. The landslide at Kłodne may be
well suited for more detailed monitoring for landslide process research,
although research opportunities exist at the other landslides as well. The
landslide near Siedloki may be a good candidate for terrestrial laser scanning
(TLS). Tandem streamflow gages upstream and downstream from the Siedloki
landslide, or laser distance meters to monitor advancement of the toe, may be
needed to provide warning of stream blockage of Potok Milowski. A real-time
warning system specifically for the Łazki landslide might be considered due
to potential concerns about catastrophic movement into Międzybrodzie
Reservoir. Challenges associated with
the establishment of a complete real-time monitoring and early warning system are
far greater than just the technical and logistical aspects of installing remote
monitoring systems at a large number of landslides. Long-term maintenance of a
landslide monitoring network will involve considerable effort and expense as
sensors break-down from exposure to weather, landslide movement, and harsh
underground environmental conditions. Once PGI’s planned pilot network
of 10-20 monitored landslides is operating, a period of observation and
analysis will be needed to establish appropriate alert levels and criteria for
issuing alerts and warnings. Simultaneously, discussions with authorities will
be needed to develop action plans for responding to landslide notifications and
(or) warnings. Public resistance to landslide warnings and mandated evacuations
may be high given the low historical incidence of fatalities and injuries
resulting from Carpathian landslides and the small potential for warnings to
reduce landslide damage to homes and land. Careful weighing of purpose,
advantages, and costs of a large-scale monitoring and early warning program is
needed early in the planning process and should be revisited regularly
throughout pilot and final implementation. In this report, we present a generic plan for monitoring of a hypothetical Carpathian landslide that illustrates how our suggestions for each of the specific landslides could be implemented. The plan includes basic pore pressure, displacement, and weather monitoring, along with supplemental monitoring for special conditions at specific landslides. Table 2 summarizes the overall approach and basic equipment and software requirements. |
Last modified March 1, 2011
For additional information: This report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. |
Collins, B.D., Baum, R.L., Mrozek, Teresa, Nescieruk, Piotr, Perski, Zbigniew, Rączkowski, Wojciech, and Graniczny, Marek, 2011, Evaluation of landslide monitoring in the Polish Carpathians: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2011-1001, 30 p.
Executive Summary
Introduction
Background
Monitoring Strategies
Evaluation of Existing PGI Monitoring Locations and Recently Reactivated Landslides
Example of a Near-Real-Time Warning System
Managing Public Perceptions about Real-Time Landslide Monitoring and Early Warning
Potential Research Questions To Be Answered By Monitoring
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References Cited
one appendix