Skip Links

USGS - science for a changing world

Open-File Report 2011–1300

Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Total Dissolved Gas and Water Temperature in the Lower Columbia River, Oregon and Washington, Water Year 2011: Quality-Assurance Data and Comparison to Water-Quality Standards

By Dwight Q. Tanner, Heather M. Bragg, and Matthew W. Johnston

Thumbnail of and link to report PDF (3.6 MB)Significant Findings

Air is entrained in water as it is flows through the spillways of dams, which causes an increase in the concentration of total dissolved gas in the water downstream from the dams. The elevated concentrations of total dissolved gas can adversely affect fish and other freshwater aquatic life. An analysis of total-dissolved-gas and water-temperature data collected at eight monitoring stations on the lower Columbia River in Oregon and Washington in 2011 indicated the following:

  • During the spill season of April–August 2011, hourly values of total dissolved gas (TDG) were larger than 115-percent saturation for the forebay (John Day navigation lock, The Dalles forebay, and Bonneville forebay) and Camas stations. Hourly values of total dissolved gas were larger than 120-percent saturation for the tailwater stations (John Day Dam tailwater, The Dalles tailwater, Cascade Island, and Warrendale).
  • During parts of August and September 2011, hourly water temperatures were greater than 20°C (degrees Celsius) at the eight stations on the lower Columbia River. According to the State of Oregon water-temperature standard, the 7-day average maximum temperature of the lower Columbia River should not exceed 20°C; Washington regulations state that the 1-day maximum should not exceed 20°C as a result of human activities.
  • Of the 79 laboratory TDG checks that were performed on instruments after field deployment, all were within ± 0.5-percent saturation and only 2 checks were out of calibration by more than 2 mm of Hg.
  • All but 4 of the 66 field checks of TDG sensors with a secondary standard were within ± 1.0-percent saturation after 3–4 weeks of deployment in the river. All 67 of the field checks of barometric pressure were within ±1 millimeter of mercury of a primary standard, and all 66 water-temperature field checks were within ±0.2°C of a secondary standard.
  • For the eight monitoring stations in water year 2011, a total of 93.5 percent of the TDG data were received in real time and were within 1-percent saturation of the expected value on the basis of calibration data, replicate quality-control measurements in the river, and com-parison to ambient river conditions at adjacent sites. Data received from the Cascade Island site were only 34.9% complete because the equipment was destroyed by high water. The other stations ranged from 99.6 to 100 percent complete.

First posted April 16, 2012

For additional information contact:
Director, Oregon Water Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2130 SW 5th Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97201
http://or.water.usgs.gov

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge.


Suggested citation:

Tanner, D.Q., Bragg, H.M., and Johnston, M.W., 2012, Total dissolved gas and water temperature in the lower Columbia River, Oregon and Washington, water year 2011: Quality-assurance data and comparison to water-quality standards: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1300, 28 p.



Contents

Significant Findings

Introduction

Methods of Data Collection

Completeness and Quality of Data for Total Dissolved Gas

Quality-Assurance Data

Effects of Spill on Concentration of Total Dissolved Gas

Comparison of Total-Dissolved-Gas Concentration and Water Temperature to Water-Quality Standards

Acknowledgments

References Cited


Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1300/
Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
Page Last Modified: Thursday, December 08, 2016, 12:17:01 AM