<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Michael N. Morgan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>John R. P. French III</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1995</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;We tested prey preferences of adult (200- to 222-mm long) redear sunfish (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Lepomis microlophus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) on two size classes of zebra mussels (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dreissena polymorpha&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) and two-ridge rams-horns (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Helisoma anceps&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) in experimental aquaria. We also tested physical limitations on consuming these mollusks and determined prey bioenergetic profitability. Redear sunfish strongly preferred rams-horns over zebra mussels, but they displayed no size preference for either prey. Ingestion was not physically limited since both prey species up to 15-mm long fit within the pharyngeal gapes of redear sunfish. Rams-horns were more bioenergetically profitable than zebra mussels and ingestion of rams-horn shell fragments was about three times less than zebra mussels. Rams-horns were somewhat more resistant to shell-crushing, but all size ranges of both prey species tested were crushable by redear sunfish. These studies suggested that the redear sunfish should not be considered a panacea for biological control of zebra mussels.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1080/02705060.1995.9663416</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Preference of redear sunfish on zebra mussels and rams-horn snails</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>