<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Nondor T. Weiss</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Donald H. Rusch</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Scott R. Craven</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert E. Trost</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>F. Dale Caswell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Michael D. Samuel</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1990</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;We used capture, harvest, and observation histories of Canada geese (&lt;i&gt;Branta canadensis&lt;/i&gt;) banded in the Mississippi flyway, 1974-88, to examine the problem of neck-band retention. Methods for the analysis of survival data were used to estimate rates of neck-band retention and to evaluate factors associated with neck-band loss. Sex, age of bird at banding, rivet use, and neck-band type significantly influenced neck-band retention. For most of the resulting cohorts (e.g., sex, age, rivet, and neck-band type categories), neck-band retention rates decreased through time. We caution against using small samples or data collected during short-term studies to determine retention rates. We suggest that observation data be used in neck-band retention studies to increase the efficiency of estimating retention time.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2307/3809358</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Neck-band retention for Canada geese in the Mississippi flyway</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>