<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>James O. Lloyd-Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>P.L.F. Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W.M. Getz</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>P.C. Cross</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2005</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;The epidemic potential of a disease is traditionally assessed using the basic reproductive number, &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;. However, in populations with social or spatial structure a chronic disease is more likely to invade than an acute disease with the same &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;, because it persists longer within each group and allows for more host movement between groups. Acute diseases &amp;lsquo;perceive&amp;rsquo; a more structured host population, and it is more important to consider host population structure in analyses of these diseases. The probability of a pandemic does not arise independently from characteristics of either the host or disease, but rather from the interaction of host movement and disease recovery timescales. The &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;*&lt;/sub&gt; statistic, a group-level equivalent of &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;, is a better indicator of disease invasion in structured populations than the individual-level &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00760.x</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Blackwell Science</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Duelling timescales of host mixing and disease spread determine invasion of disease in structured populations</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>