<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>W.H. Anderson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J.S. Sedinger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>L.L. McDonald</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>R. Michael Anthony</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1995</dc:date>
  <dc:description>We mounted a video camcorder in a single-engine aircraft to estimate &#13;
   nesting density along 10-m wide strip transects in black brant &#13;
   colonies on the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska during &#13;
   1990-1992. A global positioning system (GPS) receiver was connected &#13;
   to the video recorder and a laptop computer to locate transects and &#13;
   annotate video tape with time and latitude-longitude at 1-second &#13;
   intervals. About 4-5 hours of flight time were required to record &#13;
   30-40 minutes of video tape needed to survey large (&gt;5,000 nests in &gt; &#13;
   10 km2)colonies. We conducted ground searches along transects to &#13;
   locate and identify nests for determining detection rates of nests in &#13;
   video images. Counts of nests from video transects were correlated &#13;
   with actual numbers of nests. Resolution of images was sufficient to &#13;
   detect 81% of known nests (with and without incubating females). Of &#13;
   these, 68% were correctly identified as brant nests. The most common &#13;
   misidentification of known nests was failure of viewers to see the &#13;
   nest that the detected bird was incubating. Unattended nests with &#13;
   exposed eggs, down-covered nests, and nesting brant, cackling Canada &#13;
   geese, and emperor geese were identified in video images. Flushing of &#13;
   incubating geese by survey aircraft was not significant. About 10% of &#13;
   known nests were unoccupied in video images compared to 16% unoccupied &#13;
   nests observed from tower blinds during periods without aircraft &#13;
   disturbance.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Estimating populations of nesting brant using aerial videography</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>