<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>C. E. Starliper</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. H. Schachte</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>R. C. Cipriano</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1985</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="9833463" class="article-section-wrapper js-article-section js-content-section  " data-section-parent-id="0"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kidney and spleen homogenates from each of 60 coho salmon (&lt;i&gt;Oncorhynchus kisutch&lt;/i&gt;) and steelhead trout (&lt;i&gt;Salmo gairdneri&lt;/i&gt;) were examined for detection of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Renibacterium salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;. The proportions of positives differed widely with the detection procedures used: in coho salmon, 5% were positive by the Gram-stain procedure, 10% by the direct fluorescent antibody test, 48% by bacteriological isolation, 65% by staphylococcal coagglutination, and 73% by counterimmunoelectrophoresis; in steelhead trout, 3% were positive by Gram-stain, 8.3% by fluorescent antibody, 17% by bacteriological isolation, and 67% by counterimmunoelectrophoresis.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Renibacterium salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;was not detected in either coho salmon or steelhead trout by immunodiffusion analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.7589/0090-3558-21.2.144</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wildlife Disease Association</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Comparative sensitivities of diagnostic procedures used to detect bacterial kidney disease in salmonid fishes</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>