<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>J.D. Nichols</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>David A. Jett</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1987</dc:date>
  <dc:description>The usefulness of capture-recapture estimators in any field study will depend largely on underlying model assumptions and on how closely these assumptions approximate the actual field situation.  Evaluation of estimator performance under real-world field conditions is often a difficult matter, although several approaches are possible.  Perhaps the best approach involves use of the estimation method on a population with known parameters.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2307/1381576</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Oxford Academic</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>A field comparison of nested grid and trapping web density estimators</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>