<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>J.D. Fraser</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M.R. Fuller</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>L.S. McAllister</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J.K.D. Seegar</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>D.A. Buehler</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1995</dc:date>
  <dc:description>The effects of two radio transmitter attachment techniques on captive and one attachment technique on wild Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus  leucocephalus) were studied.  A Y-attachment method with a 160-g dummy transmitter was less apt to cause tissue damage on captive birds than an X-attachment  method, and loosely fit transmitters caused less damage than tightly fit transmitters  Annual survival of wild birds fitted with 65-g transmitters via an X attachment was estimated at 90-95%.   As a result of high survival, only five wild birds marked as nestlings were recovered.Two of these birds had superficial pressure sores from tight-fitting harnesses  It is recommended  that a 1.3-cm space be left between the transmitter and the bird's b ack when radio-tagging post-fiedging Bald Eagles.  Additional space, perhaps up to 2.5 cm, is required for nestlings to allow for added growth and development.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Captive and field-tested radio attachments for bald eagles</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>