<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>W.R. Eddleman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>P. A. Buckley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. Kelly</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>M. Legare</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1999</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Tape playback is often the only efficient technique to survey for secretive birds.  We measured the vocal responses and movements of radio-tagged black rails (Laterallus jamaicensis; 26 M, 17 F) to playback of vocalizations at 2 sites in Florida during the breeding seasons of 1992-95.  We used coefficients from logistic regression equations to model probability of a response conditional to the birds' sex. nesting status, distance to playback source, and time of survey.  With a probability of 0.811, nonnesting male black rails were ))lost likely to respond to playback, while nesting females were the least likely to respond (probability = 0.189).  We used linear regression to determine daily, monthly and annual variation in response from weekly playback surveys along a fixed route during the breeding seasons of 1993-95.  Significant sources of variation in the regression model were month (F3.48 = 3.89, P = 0.014), year (F2.48 = 9.37, P &lt; 0.001), temperature (F1.48 = 5.44, P = 0.024), and month X year (F5.48 = 2.69, P = 0.031).  The model was highly significant (P &lt; 0.001) and explained 54% of the variation of mean response per survey period (r2 = 0.54).  We combined response probability data from radiotagged black rails with playback survey route data to provide a density estimate of 0.25 birds/ha for the St. Johns National Wildlife Refuge.  The relation between the number of black rails heard during playback surveys to the actual number present was influenced by a number of variables.  We recommend caution when making density estimates from tape playback surveys</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2307/3802492</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wildlife Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The effectiveness of tape playbacks in estimating Black Rail densities</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>