<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>P. A. Baedecker</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1977</dc:date>
  <dc:description>The relative precisions obtainable using two digital methods, and three iterative least squares fitting procedures of photopeak integration have been compared empirically using 12 replicate counts of a test sample with 14 photopeaks of varying intensity. The accuracy by which the various iterative fitting methods could analyse synthetic doublets has also been evaluated, and compared with a simple non-iterative approach. ?? 1977 Akade??miai Kiado??.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/BF02517230</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The precision and accuracy of iterative and non-iterative methods of photopeak integration in activation analysis, with particular reference to the analysis of multiplets</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>