<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Audrey J. Magoun</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Beth Gardner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Patrick Valkenbury</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Richard E. Lowell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kevin McKelvey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>J. Andrew Royle</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Classical closed-population capture-recapture models do not accommodate the spatial information inherent in encounter history data obtained from camera-trapping studies. As a result, individual heterogeneity in encounter probability is induced, and it is not possible to estimate density objectively because trap arrays do not have a well-defined sample area. We applied newly-developed, capture-recapture models that accommodate the spatial attribute inherent in capture-recapture data to a population of wolverines (Gulo gulo) in Southeast Alaska in 2008. We used camera-trapping data collected from 37 cameras in a 2,140-km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; area of forested and open habitats largely enclosed by ocean and glacial icefields. We detected 21 unique individuals 115 times. Wolverines exhibited a strong positive trap response, with an increased tendency to revisit previously visited traps. Under the trap-response model, we estimated wolverine density at 9.7 individuals/1,000-km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;(95% Bayesian CI: 5.9-15.0). Our model provides a formal statistical framework for estimating density from wolverine camera-trapping studies that accounts for a behavioral response due to baited traps. Further, our model-based estimator does not have strict requirements about the spatial configuration of traps or length of trapping sessions, providing considerable operational flexibility in the development of field studies.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/jwmg.79</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>The Wildlife Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Density estimation in a wolverine population using spatial capture-recapture models</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>