<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>William A. Link</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Dennis described the field of ecology as &amp;ldquo;fertile, uncolonized ground for Bayesian ideas.&amp;rdquo; He continued: &amp;ldquo;The Bayesian propagule has arrived at the shore. Ecologists need to think long and hard about the consequences of a Bayesian ecology. The Bayesian outlook is a successful competitor, but is it a weed? I think so.&amp;rdquo; (Dennis 2004)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Review info:&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Bayesian Analysis for Population Ecology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;By Ruth King, Byron J. T. Morgan, Olivier Gimenez, and Stephen P. Brooks, 2010. ISBN: 978-1439811870, xvii,&amp;nbsp;442 pp.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1198/tast.2010.br651</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Statistical Association</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Book review: Bayesian analysis for population ecology</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>