<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Kevin J. Breen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Tammy M. Zimmerman</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Pesticide concentration data for waters from selected carbonate-rock aquifers in agricultural areas of Pennsylvania were collected in 1993&amp;ndash;2009 for occurrence and distribution assessments. A set of 30 wells was visited once in 1993&amp;ndash;1995 and again in 2008&amp;ndash;2009 to assess concentration changes. The data include censored matched pairs (nondetections of a compound in one or both samples of a pair). A potentially improved approach for assessing concentration changes is presented where (i) concentrations are adjusted with models of matrix-spike recovery and (ii) area-wide temporal change is tested by use of the paired Prentice-Wilcoxon (PPW) statistical test. The PPW results for atrazine, simazine, metolachlor, prometon, and an atrazine degradate, deethylatrazine (DEA), are compared using recovery-adjusted and unadjusted concentrations. Results for adjusted compared with unadjusted concentrations in 2008&amp;ndash;2009 compared with 1993&amp;ndash;1995 were similar for atrazine and simazine (significant decrease; 95% confidence level) and metolachlor (no change) but differed for DEA (adjusted, decrease; unadjusted, increase) and prometon (adjusted, decrease; unadjusted, no change). The PPW results were different on recovery-adjusted compared with unadjusted concentrations. Not accounting for variability in recovery can mask a true change, misidentify a change when no true change exists, or assign a direction opposite of the true change in concentration that resulted from matrix influences on extraction and laboratory method performance. However, matrix-based models of recovery derived from a laboratory performance dataset from multiple studies for national assessment, as used herein, rather than time- and study-specific recoveries may introduce uncertainty in recovery adjustments for individual samples that should be considered in assessing change.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2134/jeq2011.0271</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>ACSESS DL</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluating changes in matrix based, recovery-adjusted concentrations in paired data for pesticides in groundwater</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>