<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>James R. Mihelcic</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Dean C. Luehrs</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James P. Hickey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>James R. Baker</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1997</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;A critically evaluated set of 94 soil water partition coefficients normalized to soil organic carbon content (&lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) is presented for 11 classes of organic chemicals. This data set is used to develop and evaluate &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; estimation methods using three different descriptors. The three types of descriptors used in predicting &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; were octanol/water partition coefficient (&lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;), molecular connectivity (&lt;sup&gt;m&lt;/sup&gt;X&lt;sub&gt;t&lt;/sub&gt;) and linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs). The best results were obtained estimating &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; from &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, though a slight improvement in the correlation coefficient was obtained by using a two-parameter regression with &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and the third order difference term from &lt;sup&gt;m&lt;/sup&gt;X&lt;sub&gt;t&lt;/sub&gt;. Molecular connectivity correlations seemed to be best suited for use with specific chemical classes. The LSER provided a better fit than &lt;sup&gt;m&lt;/sup&gt;X&lt;sub&gt;t&lt;/sub&gt; but not as good as the correlation with &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;. The correlation to predict &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; from &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; was developed for 72 chemicals; log &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; = 0.903* log &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; + 0.094. This correlation accounts for 91% of the variability in the data for chemicals with log &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; ranging from 1.7 to 7.0. The expression to determine the 95% confidence interval on the estimated &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is provided along with an example for two chemicals of different hydrophobicity showing the confidence interval of the retardation factor determined from the estimated &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;. The data showed that &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is not likely to be applicable for chemicals with log &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &amp;lt; 1.7. Finally, the &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;oc&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; correlation developed using &lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;ow&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; as a descriptor was compared with three nonclass-specific correlations and two 'commonly used' class-specific correlations to determine which method(s) are most suitable.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2175/106143097X125281</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Water Environment Federation</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluation of estimation methods for organic carbon normalized sorption coefficients</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>