<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Katherine C. Kendall</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Daniel P. Reinhart</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Diana F. Tomback</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Stephen F. Arno</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert E. Keane</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>David J. Mattson</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2001</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Appropriately enough, much of this book is devoted to discussing management challenges and techniques. However, the impetus for action—the desire to save whitebark pine (&lt;i&gt;Pinus albicaulis&lt;/i&gt;) - necessarily arises from the extent to which we cherish it for its beauty and its connections with other things that we value. Whitebark pine is at the hub of a fascinating web of relationships. It is the stuff of great stories (cf. Quammen 1994). One of the more interesting of these stories pertains to the dependence of certain grizzly bear (&lt;i&gt;Ursus arctos horribilis&lt;/i&gt;) populations on its seeds, and the role that red squirrels (&lt;i&gt;Tamiasciurus hudsonicus&lt;/i&gt;) play as an agent of transfer between tree and bear.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Island Press</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Whitebark pine, grizzly bears, and red squirrels</dc:title>
  <dc:type>chapter</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>