<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>E. A. Jenne</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1972</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;An analysis of the available literature data indicates that the cation exchange capacity and surface charge density of imogolite decrease systematically as the mole % of Al&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; (i.e. 100 Al&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;/SIO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; + Al&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;) increases. This behavior is analogous to that of synthetic aluminosilicates. In contrast, no relation is apparent between the cation exchange capacity and mole % Al&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; for allophane. This difference is rather striking and although both are amorphic, i.e. show minimal specific X-ray diffraction effects, imogolite is somewhat more crystalline than allophane (Russell et al., 1969)&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1346/CCMN.1972.0200209</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>The Clay Minerals Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Surface charge density dependency on Al2O3 content in imogolite</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>