<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>L. C. Calk</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R. W. Kistler</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>F. C. W. Dodge</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1986</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;An assemblage of pyroxenite, peridotite, and mafic granulite xenoliths contained in the toe of a 10 Ma trachybasalt flow remnant overlying Late Cretaceous granitoids indicates the presence of a mafic-ultramafic complex beneath the Sierra Nevada batholith. Olivine-free pyroxenites that include orthopyroxenites, websterites, and clinopyroxenites are dominant. Primary igneous textures are displayed by some pyroxenites, but commonly are masked by recrystallization. Fe-rich harzburgites and lherzolites are rare. A few of the ultramafic xenoliths contain ovoid opaque patches that are apparently pseudomorphs after garnet and have pyralspite garnet compositions. A pressure corresponding to a lower crustal depth of approximately 40 km has been determined from two of these xenoliths using a garnet-orthopyroxene geobarometer. Abundant mafic granulites can be subdivided into those containing 12 per cent or less A&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and chemically gradational with pyroxenites and others containing more than 15 per cent A&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and showing considerable scatter on oxide variation diagrams. The high-alumina granulite xenoliths have relatively low&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;87&lt;/sup&gt;Rb/&lt;sup&gt;86&lt;/sup&gt;Sr but high&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;87&lt;/sup&gt;Sr/&lt;sup&gt;86&lt;/sup&gt;Sr, whereas low-alumina and ultramafic xenoliths have a wide range of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;87&lt;/sup&gt;Rb/&lt;sup&gt;86&lt;/sup&gt;Sr, but lower&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;87&lt;/sup&gt;Sr/&lt;sup&gt;86&lt;/sup&gt;Sr; the isotopic data indicate an age for the complex roughly the same as that of overlying granitoid plutons. However, the granitoids have initial&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;87&lt;/sup&gt;Sr/&lt;sup&gt;86&lt;/sup&gt;Sr ratios intermediate between the high-alumina and ultramafic xenoliths, suggesting that they may have resulted from mixing of basaltic magma, represented by the ultramafics, and crustal materials, with subsequent crystal fractionation. The trachybasalt may represent a partial melt of the ultramafic rocks. Rocks analogous to the Chinese Peak xenoliths are exposed in the Giles complex of central Australia, a series of several deformed layered mafic and ultramafic intrusions, emplaced in a granulite facies terrain. Contemporaneous development of mafic-ultramafic complexes and the Sierra Nevada batholith may explain the present day thick (˜ 50 km) crust in this region&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1093/petrology/27.6.1277</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Oxford Academic</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Lower crustal xenoliths, Chinese Peak lava flow, central Sierra Nevada</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>