<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>L.R. Camp</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M.S. Summers</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>D.M. Rapp</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>R.B. Read</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1989</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A kinetic study has been conducted to determine the influence of reagent type on flotation rates of ultrafine coal. Two ultrafine coal samples, the Illinois No. 5 (Springfield) and Pittsburgh No. 8, have been evaluated with various reagent types in order to derive the rate constants for coal (k&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;), ash (k&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;a&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;), and pyrite (k&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;). The reagents used in the study include anionic surfactants, anionic surfactant—alcohol mixtures, and frothing alcohols.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In general, the surfactant-alcohol mixtures tend to float ultrafine coal at a rate three to four times faster than either pure alcohols or pure anionic surfactants. Pine oil, a mixture of terpene alcohols and hydrocarbons, was an exception to this finding; it exhibited higher rate constants than the pure aliphatic alcohols or other pure anionic surfactants studied; this may be explained by the fact that the sample of pine oil used (70% alpha-terpineol) acted as a frother/collector system similar to alcohol/kerosene. The separation efficiencies of ash and pyrite from coal, as evidenced by the ratios of k&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;/k&lt;sub&gt;a&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;or k&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;/k&lt;sub&gt;p&lt;/sub&gt;, tend to indicate, however, that commercially available surfactant—alcohol mixtures are not as selective as pure alcohols such as 2-ethyl-1-hexanol or methylisobutylcarbinol.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Some distinct differences in various rate constants, or their ratios, were noted between the two coals studied, and are possibly attributable to surface chemistry effects.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/0032-5910(89)80061-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The influence of reagent type on the kinetics of ultrafine coal flotation</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>