M. Stuiver D.K. Yamaguchi B.F. Atwater 1991 <p><span>The Cascadia subduction zone, which extends along the northern Pacific coast of North America, might produce earthquakes of magnitude 8 or 9 ('great' earthquakes) even though it has not done so during the past 200 years of European observation</span>^1–7<span>. Much of the evidence for past Cascadia earthquakes comes from former meadows and forests that became tidal mudflats owing to abrupt tectonic subsidence in the past 5,000 years</span>^2,3,6,7<span>. If due to a great earthquake, such subsidence should have extended along more than 100 km of the coast</span>²<span>. Here we investigate the extent of coastal subsidence that might have been caused by a single earthquake, through high-precision radiocarbon dating of coastal trees that abruptly subsided into the intertidal zone. The ages leave the great-earthquake hypothesis intact by limiting to a few decades the discordance, if any, in the most recent subsidence of two areas 55 km apart along the Washington coast. This subsidence probably occurred about 300 years ago.</span></p> application/pdf 10.1038/353156a0 en Springer Nature Radiocarbon test of earthquake magnitude at the Cascadia subduction zone article