<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>N.W. Peddie</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1992</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="article-overiew-abstract-wrap"&gt;&lt;p class="global-para-14"&gt;The 1991 revision of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) comprises a definitive main-field model for 1985.0, amain-field model for 1990.0, and a forecast secular-variation model for the period 1990-1995. The five 1985.0 main-field models and five 1990.0 main-field models that were proposed have been evaluated by comparing them with one another, with magnetic observatory data, and with Project MAGNET aerial survey data. The three secular-variation models that were proposed have also been compared with one another, and with estimates of recent rates of change at the observatories. The comparisons indicate that the main-field models proposed by IZMIRAN, and the secular-variation model proposed jointly by the British Geological Survey and the U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office, should be assigned relatively lower weight in the derivation of the new IGRF models.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="datarepo-wrap"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="article-overiew-references-wrap"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.5636/jgg.44.793</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>J-STAGE</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluation of models proposed for the 1991 revision of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>